{"title":"利用全球马尔奎斯特生产力指数分析欧盟社会包容性的变化","authors":"Giannis Karagiannis, Panagiotis Ravanos","doi":"10.1111/itor.13519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we use the global and the biennial Malmquist productivity indices for the Inverted Benefit‐of‐the‐Doubt model to analyze changes in EU social inclusion using data for the period 2011–2020. Our empirical results indicate that relatively more progress took place in EU social inclusion during the period 2015–2020, compared to the period 2011–2015. In addition, in the period 2011–2015, these improvements were possible mainly through the effect of efficiency change, while in the period 2015–2020, the main source of progress was the effect of the best‐practice change. In addition, we found that the “older” Member States achieved slightly faster progress rates, compared to the “new” Member States in the period 2011–2015, while the opposite was true for the period 2015–2020.","PeriodicalId":49176,"journal":{"name":"International Transactions in Operational Research","volume":"74 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analyzing changes in EU social inclusion using the global Malmquist productivity index\",\"authors\":\"Giannis Karagiannis, Panagiotis Ravanos\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/itor.13519\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we use the global and the biennial Malmquist productivity indices for the Inverted Benefit‐of‐the‐Doubt model to analyze changes in EU social inclusion using data for the period 2011–2020. Our empirical results indicate that relatively more progress took place in EU social inclusion during the period 2015–2020, compared to the period 2011–2015. In addition, in the period 2011–2015, these improvements were possible mainly through the effect of efficiency change, while in the period 2015–2020, the main source of progress was the effect of the best‐practice change. In addition, we found that the “older” Member States achieved slightly faster progress rates, compared to the “new” Member States in the period 2011–2015, while the opposite was true for the period 2015–2020.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Transactions in Operational Research\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Transactions in Operational Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.13519\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Transactions in Operational Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.13519","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
Analyzing changes in EU social inclusion using the global Malmquist productivity index
In this paper, we use the global and the biennial Malmquist productivity indices for the Inverted Benefit‐of‐the‐Doubt model to analyze changes in EU social inclusion using data for the period 2011–2020. Our empirical results indicate that relatively more progress took place in EU social inclusion during the period 2015–2020, compared to the period 2011–2015. In addition, in the period 2011–2015, these improvements were possible mainly through the effect of efficiency change, while in the period 2015–2020, the main source of progress was the effect of the best‐practice change. In addition, we found that the “older” Member States achieved slightly faster progress rates, compared to the “new” Member States in the period 2011–2015, while the opposite was true for the period 2015–2020.
期刊介绍:
International Transactions in Operational Research (ITOR) aims to advance the understanding and practice of Operational Research (OR) and Management Science internationally. Its scope includes:
International problems, such as those of fisheries management, environmental issues, and global competitiveness
International work done by major OR figures
Studies of worldwide interest from nations with emerging OR communities
National or regional OR work which has the potential for application in other nations
Technical developments of international interest
Specific organizational examples that can be applied in other countries
National and international presentations of transnational interest
Broadly relevant professional issues, such as those of ethics and practice
Applications relevant to global industries, such as operations management, manufacturing, and logistics.