儿童携带角度的临床放射学相关性观察研究

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI:10.1007/s43465-024-01254-9
Gauri A. Patki, Binoti A. Sheth, Lomash Bharati
{"title":"儿童携带角度的临床放射学相关性观察研究","authors":"Gauri A. Patki, Binoti A. Sheth, Lomash Bharati","doi":"10.1007/s43465-024-01254-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Introduction</h3><p>The purpose of this study is to establish the correlation of clinically measured carrying angle with four radiological angles, i.e., Humerus–Elbow–Wrist angle (HEWA), Humero-ulnar angle, Metaphyseal–Diaphyseal angle, and Baumann’s angle, and to find out which of the above-mentioned angles co-relates best with the clinically measured carrying angle.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>We studied 100 patients in the age group of 2–12 years after Ethics committee approval and informed consent from parents. Clinical angle was measured using goniometer and radiological angles marked on antero-posterior elbow X-ray using a standard method. Collected data were studied using statistical tests to find out correlation.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Pearson correlation coefficient for humerus–elbow–wrist angle found to be 0.674 followed by Humero-Ulnar angle (<i>r</i> = 0.417). Regression coefficient for humerus–elbow–wrist angle is 0.635 (<i>p</i> value &lt; 0.001).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Humerus–Elbow–Wrist angle correlates better compared to other radiological angles in assessment of varus–valgus angulations of elbow &amp; will not only play a vital role in pre- operative planning of deformity corrections but also in the evaluation &amp; comparison of the post-operative functional outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":13338,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","volume":"74 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Observational Study of Clinico-radiological Co-relation of Carrying Angle in Children\",\"authors\":\"Gauri A. Patki, Binoti A. Sheth, Lomash Bharati\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43465-024-01254-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Introduction</h3><p>The purpose of this study is to establish the correlation of clinically measured carrying angle with four radiological angles, i.e., Humerus–Elbow–Wrist angle (HEWA), Humero-ulnar angle, Metaphyseal–Diaphyseal angle, and Baumann’s angle, and to find out which of the above-mentioned angles co-relates best with the clinically measured carrying angle.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>We studied 100 patients in the age group of 2–12 years after Ethics committee approval and informed consent from parents. Clinical angle was measured using goniometer and radiological angles marked on antero-posterior elbow X-ray using a standard method. Collected data were studied using statistical tests to find out correlation.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>Pearson correlation coefficient for humerus–elbow–wrist angle found to be 0.674 followed by Humero-Ulnar angle (<i>r</i> = 0.417). Regression coefficient for humerus–elbow–wrist angle is 0.635 (<i>p</i> value &lt; 0.001).</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusion</h3><p>Humerus–Elbow–Wrist angle correlates better compared to other radiological angles in assessment of varus–valgus angulations of elbow &amp; will not only play a vital role in pre- operative planning of deformity corrections but also in the evaluation &amp; comparison of the post-operative functional outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-024-01254-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-024-01254-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言 本研究的目的是建立临床测量的携带角与四个放射学角度(即肱骨-肘-腕角度(HEWA)、肱骨-桡骨角度、骺端-骺端角度和鲍曼角度)之间的相关性,并找出上述角度中哪个与临床测量的携带角最相关。使用动态关节角度计测量临床角度,并使用标准方法在肘关节前后X光片上标记放射角度。结果发现,肱骨-肘-腕角度的皮尔逊相关系数为 0.674,其次是肱骨-肘角度(r = 0.417)。肱骨-肘-腕角度的回归系数为 0.635(P 值为 0.001)。结论肱骨-肘-腕角度与其他放射角度相比,在评估肘关节的曲度-外翻角度方面具有更好的相关性,不仅在畸形矫正的术前规划中,而且在术后功能结果的评估和比较中都将发挥重要作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An Observational Study of Clinico-radiological Co-relation of Carrying Angle in Children

Introduction

The purpose of this study is to establish the correlation of clinically measured carrying angle with four radiological angles, i.e., Humerus–Elbow–Wrist angle (HEWA), Humero-ulnar angle, Metaphyseal–Diaphyseal angle, and Baumann’s angle, and to find out which of the above-mentioned angles co-relates best with the clinically measured carrying angle.

Methods

We studied 100 patients in the age group of 2–12 years after Ethics committee approval and informed consent from parents. Clinical angle was measured using goniometer and radiological angles marked on antero-posterior elbow X-ray using a standard method. Collected data were studied using statistical tests to find out correlation.

Results

Pearson correlation coefficient for humerus–elbow–wrist angle found to be 0.674 followed by Humero-Ulnar angle (r = 0.417). Regression coefficient for humerus–elbow–wrist angle is 0.635 (p value < 0.001).

Conclusion

Humerus–Elbow–Wrist angle correlates better compared to other radiological angles in assessment of varus–valgus angulations of elbow & will not only play a vital role in pre- operative planning of deformity corrections but also in the evaluation & comparison of the post-operative functional outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: IJO welcomes articles that contribute to Orthopaedic knowledge from India and overseas. We publish articles dealing with clinical orthopaedics and basic research in orthopaedic surgery. Articles are accepted only for exclusive publication in the Indian Journal of Orthopaedics. Previously published articles, articles which are in peer-reviewed electronic publications in other journals, are not accepted by the Journal. Published articles and illustrations become the property of the Journal. The copyright remains with the journal. Studies must be carried out in accordance with World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki.
期刊最新文献
Technology Update in Management of Multi-Ligament Knee Injuries. From the Guest Editors: Unraveling the Complexities of Multiligament Knee Injuries-A Global Endeavor. Strategies for Preventing Tunnel Convergence in Multiligament Knee Injury Reconstructions. Adjustable Loop Fixation in Multi-ligament Knee Injuries: A Technical Note. Clinical Results of Isolated MCL Grade III Injury in Acute and Chronic Setting: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1