使用术后支具或不使用支具的前交叉韧带重建患者的早期功能效果:前瞻性观察病例对照研究

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1007/s43465-024-01240-1
Nishchal Rijal, Amit Joshi, Bibek Basukala, Nagmani Singh, Rohit Bista, Rajiv Sharma, Subash Gurung, Ishor Pradhan
{"title":"使用术后支具或不使用支具的前交叉韧带重建患者的早期功能效果:前瞻性观察病例对照研究","authors":"Nishchal Rijal, Amit Joshi, Bibek Basukala, Nagmani Singh, Rohit Bista, Rajiv Sharma, Subash Gurung, Ishor Pradhan","doi":"10.1007/s43465-024-01240-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>The use of rehabilitative knee braces after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) has been controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the early functional outcome associated with post-ACLR brace use.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>This prospective observational case–control study was conducted at AKB Center for Arthroscopy, Sports Injury, and Regenerative Medicine, B&amp;B Hospital, Lalitpur, Nepal. A total of 132 patients undergoing arthroscopic ACLR with or without a meniscal procedure were enrolled in this study, with the final analysis consisting of 66 patients in the control group (brace group) and 66 patients in the case group (no brace group). Braces were applied to the affected lower limb in the control group in the operating room immediately after surgery and were continued for 4 weeks post-operatively. The rehabilitation protocol was the same for both groups. The patients were evaluated on the 3rd post-operative day, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks post-operatively in terms of Lysholm knee scores, clinical tests (Lachman and pivot shift test), range of motion (flexion and extension), VAS scores for pain, thigh girth differences, and the 12-item short-form health survey (SF-12) scores.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding outcome measures, except the mental component summary of SF-12 which was significantly better in the non-braced group (<i>P</i> = 0.006).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>There was no significant difference in early functional outcome between the braced and non-braced groups following ACLR with or without a meniscal procedure. Better SF-12 mental component summary scores were seen in the nonbraced group, which indicated possible mental discomfort in patients with brace use.</p>","PeriodicalId":13338,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early Functional Outcome After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Patients Using Post-Operative Brace or No Brace: A Prospective Observational Case–Control Study\",\"authors\":\"Nishchal Rijal, Amit Joshi, Bibek Basukala, Nagmani Singh, Rohit Bista, Rajiv Sharma, Subash Gurung, Ishor Pradhan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s43465-024-01240-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Background</h3><p>The use of rehabilitative knee braces after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) has been controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the early functional outcome associated with post-ACLR brace use.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>This prospective observational case–control study was conducted at AKB Center for Arthroscopy, Sports Injury, and Regenerative Medicine, B&amp;B Hospital, Lalitpur, Nepal. A total of 132 patients undergoing arthroscopic ACLR with or without a meniscal procedure were enrolled in this study, with the final analysis consisting of 66 patients in the control group (brace group) and 66 patients in the case group (no brace group). Braces were applied to the affected lower limb in the control group in the operating room immediately after surgery and were continued for 4 weeks post-operatively. The rehabilitation protocol was the same for both groups. The patients were evaluated on the 3rd post-operative day, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks post-operatively in terms of Lysholm knee scores, clinical tests (Lachman and pivot shift test), range of motion (flexion and extension), VAS scores for pain, thigh girth differences, and the 12-item short-form health survey (SF-12) scores.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding outcome measures, except the mental component summary of SF-12 which was significantly better in the non-braced group (<i>P</i> = 0.006).</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusion</h3><p>There was no significant difference in early functional outcome between the braced and non-braced groups following ACLR with or without a meniscal procedure. Better SF-12 mental component summary scores were seen in the nonbraced group, which indicated possible mental discomfort in patients with brace use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-024-01240-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Orthopaedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43465-024-01240-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景前交叉韧带重建术(ACLR)后使用膝关节康复支架一直存在争议。这项前瞻性观察病例对照研究在尼泊尔拉利德布尔的 B&B 医院 AKB 关节镜、运动损伤和再生医学中心进行。共有132名接受关节镜前交叉韧带置换术(带或不带半月板手术)的患者参与了这项研究,最终分析包括对照组(支架组)66名患者和病例组(无支架组)66名患者。对照组患者术后立即在手术室为患侧下肢佩戴支具,并在术后持续使用4周。两组患者的康复方案相同。分别于术后第3天、2周、6周和12周对患者进行评估,包括膝关节Lysholm评分、临床测试(Lachman和枢轴移位测试)、活动范围(屈伸)、疼痛VAS评分、大腿围差异和12项短表健康调查(SF-12)评分。结果两组在结果测量方面无明显差异,但无支架组的 SF-12 心理部分汇总得分明显高于有支架组(P = 0.006)。无支架组的SF-12心理部分总分更好,这表明使用支架的患者可能会出现心理不适。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Early Functional Outcome After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Patients Using Post-Operative Brace or No Brace: A Prospective Observational Case–Control Study

Background

The use of rehabilitative knee braces after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) has been controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the early functional outcome associated with post-ACLR brace use.

Methods

This prospective observational case–control study was conducted at AKB Center for Arthroscopy, Sports Injury, and Regenerative Medicine, B&B Hospital, Lalitpur, Nepal. A total of 132 patients undergoing arthroscopic ACLR with or without a meniscal procedure were enrolled in this study, with the final analysis consisting of 66 patients in the control group (brace group) and 66 patients in the case group (no brace group). Braces were applied to the affected lower limb in the control group in the operating room immediately after surgery and were continued for 4 weeks post-operatively. The rehabilitation protocol was the same for both groups. The patients were evaluated on the 3rd post-operative day, 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks post-operatively in terms of Lysholm knee scores, clinical tests (Lachman and pivot shift test), range of motion (flexion and extension), VAS scores for pain, thigh girth differences, and the 12-item short-form health survey (SF-12) scores.

Results

There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding outcome measures, except the mental component summary of SF-12 which was significantly better in the non-braced group (P = 0.006).

Conclusion

There was no significant difference in early functional outcome between the braced and non-braced groups following ACLR with or without a meniscal procedure. Better SF-12 mental component summary scores were seen in the nonbraced group, which indicated possible mental discomfort in patients with brace use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: IJO welcomes articles that contribute to Orthopaedic knowledge from India and overseas. We publish articles dealing with clinical orthopaedics and basic research in orthopaedic surgery. Articles are accepted only for exclusive publication in the Indian Journal of Orthopaedics. Previously published articles, articles which are in peer-reviewed electronic publications in other journals, are not accepted by the Journal. Published articles and illustrations become the property of the Journal. The copyright remains with the journal. Studies must be carried out in accordance with World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki.
期刊最新文献
Nonunion of Fractures: A Review of Epidemiology, Diagnosis, and Clinical Features in Recent Literature Can a Surgical Vulnerability Score Predict Outcomes of Hip Reconstruction in Children with Severe Neuromuscular Disability? Location of the Anatomic Footprint Centers of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Determined by Quadrant Method on Three-Dimensional Magnetic Resonance Imaging The Use of Nitinol Continuous Compression Implants in Orthopaedic Trauma A Modern-Day Algorithm for the Treatment of Multi-Ligament Knee Injuries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1