指南建议对您有何作用?患者对动脉高血压治疗方法有效性的看法

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Journal of Human Hypertension Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI:10.1038/s41371-024-00951-0
Johanna Seiffert, Niklas Ortelbach, Anja Hummel, Grace O’Malley, Thomas Stamm, Karl Haller
{"title":"指南建议对您有何作用?患者对动脉高血压治疗方法有效性的看法","authors":"Johanna Seiffert, Niklas Ortelbach, Anja Hummel, Grace O’Malley, Thomas Stamm, Karl Haller","doi":"10.1038/s41371-024-00951-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Blood pressure remains in the hypertensive range in nearly half of those affected by arterial hypertension despite it being an extremely modifiable risk factor, whereby morbidity decreases significantly upon implementation of lifestyle-based therapeutic approaches. There are significant discrepancies between the S3 guideline’s recommendations and its implementation. In this cross-sectional study sampling 160 inpatients with arterial hypertension, we assessed patients’ perceptions of secondary prevention therapeutic approaches recommended to them within treatment guidelines. Additionally, we used psychometric questionnaires to assess prevention factors. We conducted a latent class analysis to identify patterns in patients’ views, and tested for group differences regarding gender, age, education years, body mass index, psychopathology, and blood pressure. Two latent classes could be identified: Class 1 tended to perceive all recommended therapeutic approaches as helpful and reflected individuals with high-normal blood pressure. Class 2 tended to view recommendations regarding weight reduction, and cessation of nicotine and alcohol use, as less effective and included those with mild hypertension. There were no statistically significant class differences regarding the socio-demographic parameters. We further examined the evaluation of therapeutic approaches independent of classes, with social support reported to be the most effective approach. In conclusion, persistently-elevated blood pressure may be linked to poorer perceptions of therapeutic approaches which are then not implemented. Furthermore, patient-centered treatment planning and concepts such as shared decision-making appear to be central in treating this population regarding secondary prevention.","PeriodicalId":16070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Hypertension","volume":"38 12","pages":"821-827"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How do the guideline recommendations work for you? Patients’ perceived effectiveness of therapeutic approaches in arterial hypertension\",\"authors\":\"Johanna Seiffert, Niklas Ortelbach, Anja Hummel, Grace O’Malley, Thomas Stamm, Karl Haller\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41371-024-00951-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Blood pressure remains in the hypertensive range in nearly half of those affected by arterial hypertension despite it being an extremely modifiable risk factor, whereby morbidity decreases significantly upon implementation of lifestyle-based therapeutic approaches. There are significant discrepancies between the S3 guideline’s recommendations and its implementation. In this cross-sectional study sampling 160 inpatients with arterial hypertension, we assessed patients’ perceptions of secondary prevention therapeutic approaches recommended to them within treatment guidelines. Additionally, we used psychometric questionnaires to assess prevention factors. We conducted a latent class analysis to identify patterns in patients’ views, and tested for group differences regarding gender, age, education years, body mass index, psychopathology, and blood pressure. Two latent classes could be identified: Class 1 tended to perceive all recommended therapeutic approaches as helpful and reflected individuals with high-normal blood pressure. Class 2 tended to view recommendations regarding weight reduction, and cessation of nicotine and alcohol use, as less effective and included those with mild hypertension. There were no statistically significant class differences regarding the socio-demographic parameters. We further examined the evaluation of therapeutic approaches independent of classes, with social support reported to be the most effective approach. In conclusion, persistently-elevated blood pressure may be linked to poorer perceptions of therapeutic approaches which are then not implemented. Furthermore, patient-centered treatment planning and concepts such as shared decision-making appear to be central in treating this population regarding secondary prevention.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Human Hypertension\",\"volume\":\"38 12\",\"pages\":\"821-827\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Human Hypertension\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41371-024-00951-0\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Hypertension","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41371-024-00951-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管动脉高血压是一个极易改变的风险因素,在实施以生活方式为基础的治疗方法后,发病率会显著降低,但近半数动脉高血压患者的血压仍处于高血压范围内。S3 指南的建议与实施之间存在很大差异。在这项抽取了 160 名动脉高血压住院患者的横断面研究中,我们评估了患者对治疗指南中推荐的二级预防治疗方法的看法。此外,我们还使用心理测量问卷来评估预防因素。我们进行了潜类分析,以确定患者观点的模式,并检验了性别、年龄、受教育年限、体重指数、精神病理学和血压方面的群体差异。结果发现了两个潜在类别:第一类倾向于认为所有建议的治疗方法都有帮助,反映了血压正常的人。第二类倾向于认为有关减轻体重、戒烟戒酒的建议效果较差,包括轻度高血压患者。在社会人口学参数方面,等级差异没有统计学意义。我们还进一步研究了治疗方法的评估,结果显示社会支持是最有效的方法。总之,血压持续升高可能与对治疗方法的认知较差有关,而这种认知较差又导致治疗方法无法实施。此外,以患者为中心的治疗计划和共同决策等概念似乎是治疗这类人群二级预防的核心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How do the guideline recommendations work for you? Patients’ perceived effectiveness of therapeutic approaches in arterial hypertension
Blood pressure remains in the hypertensive range in nearly half of those affected by arterial hypertension despite it being an extremely modifiable risk factor, whereby morbidity decreases significantly upon implementation of lifestyle-based therapeutic approaches. There are significant discrepancies between the S3 guideline’s recommendations and its implementation. In this cross-sectional study sampling 160 inpatients with arterial hypertension, we assessed patients’ perceptions of secondary prevention therapeutic approaches recommended to them within treatment guidelines. Additionally, we used psychometric questionnaires to assess prevention factors. We conducted a latent class analysis to identify patterns in patients’ views, and tested for group differences regarding gender, age, education years, body mass index, psychopathology, and blood pressure. Two latent classes could be identified: Class 1 tended to perceive all recommended therapeutic approaches as helpful and reflected individuals with high-normal blood pressure. Class 2 tended to view recommendations regarding weight reduction, and cessation of nicotine and alcohol use, as less effective and included those with mild hypertension. There were no statistically significant class differences regarding the socio-demographic parameters. We further examined the evaluation of therapeutic approaches independent of classes, with social support reported to be the most effective approach. In conclusion, persistently-elevated blood pressure may be linked to poorer perceptions of therapeutic approaches which are then not implemented. Furthermore, patient-centered treatment planning and concepts such as shared decision-making appear to be central in treating this population regarding secondary prevention.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Human Hypertension
Journal of Human Hypertension 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
126
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Human Hypertension is published monthly and is of interest to health care professionals who deal with hypertension (specialists, internists, primary care physicians) and public health workers. We believe that our patients benefit from robust scientific data that are based on well conducted clinical trials. We also believe that basic sciences are the foundations on which we build our knowledge of clinical conditions and their management. Towards this end, although we are primarily a clinical based journal, we also welcome suitable basic sciences studies that promote our understanding of human hypertension. The journal aims to perform the dual role of increasing knowledge in the field of high blood pressure as well as improving the standard of care of patients. The editors will consider for publication all suitable papers dealing directly or indirectly with clinical aspects of hypertension, including but not limited to epidemiology, pathophysiology, therapeutics and basic sciences involving human subjects or tissues. We also consider papers from all specialties such as ophthalmology, cardiology, nephrology, obstetrics and stroke medicine that deal with the various aspects of hypertension and its complications.
期刊最新文献
Investigation and management of resistant hypertension: British and Irish Hypertension Society position statement. Blood pressure measurement technique in clinical practice in the NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde. "Clinical prediction model for masked hypertension diagnosed by 24-h ambulatory blood pressure measurements in a sample from specialized hospital." Preventing troublesome variability in clinical blood pressure measurement. U-shaped association between blood pressure and all-cause mortality in older adults: the Shizuoka study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1