计算机科学领域开放获取金牌出版物的影响分析

Padraig Cunningham, Barry Smyth
{"title":"计算机科学领域开放获取金牌出版物的影响分析","authors":"Padraig Cunningham, Barry Smyth","doi":"arxiv-2408.10262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There has been some concern about the impact of predatory publishers on\nscientific research for some time. Recently, publishers that might previously\nhave been considered `predatory' have established their bona fides, at least to\nthe extent that they are included in citation impact scores such as the\nfield-weighted citation impact (FWCI). These are sometimes called `grey'\npublishers (MDPI, Frontiers, Hindawi). In this paper, we show that the citation\nlandscape for these grey publications is significantly different from the\nmainstream landscape and that affording publications in these venues the same\nstatus as publications in mainstream journals may significantly distort metrics\nsuch as the FWCI.","PeriodicalId":501285,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Digital Libraries","volume":"69 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Analysis of the Impact of Gold Open Access Publications in Computer Science\",\"authors\":\"Padraig Cunningham, Barry Smyth\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2408.10262\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There has been some concern about the impact of predatory publishers on\\nscientific research for some time. Recently, publishers that might previously\\nhave been considered `predatory' have established their bona fides, at least to\\nthe extent that they are included in citation impact scores such as the\\nfield-weighted citation impact (FWCI). These are sometimes called `grey'\\npublishers (MDPI, Frontiers, Hindawi). In this paper, we show that the citation\\nlandscape for these grey publications is significantly different from the\\nmainstream landscape and that affording publications in these venues the same\\nstatus as publications in mainstream journals may significantly distort metrics\\nsuch as the FWCI.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - CS - Digital Libraries\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - CS - Digital Libraries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.10262\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Digital Libraries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.10262","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一段时间以来,人们一直在关注掠夺性出版商对科学研究的影响。最近,以前可能被认为是 "掠夺性 "的出版商已经建立了自己的诚信,至少在一定程度上,它们被纳入了诸如场加权引文影响(FWCI)等引文影响评分中。这些出版商有时被称为 "灰色 "出版商(MDPI、Frontiers、Hindawi)。在本文中,我们表明这些灰色出版物的引文格局与主流格局大相径庭,给予这些刊物与主流期刊刊物同等的地位可能会严重扭曲FWCI等指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An Analysis of the Impact of Gold Open Access Publications in Computer Science
There has been some concern about the impact of predatory publishers on scientific research for some time. Recently, publishers that might previously have been considered `predatory' have established their bona fides, at least to the extent that they are included in citation impact scores such as the field-weighted citation impact (FWCI). These are sometimes called `grey' publishers (MDPI, Frontiers, Hindawi). In this paper, we show that the citation landscape for these grey publications is significantly different from the mainstream landscape and that affording publications in these venues the same status as publications in mainstream journals may significantly distort metrics such as the FWCI.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Publishing Instincts: An Exploration-Exploitation Framework for Studying Academic Publishing Behavior and "Home Venues" Research Citations Building Trust in Wikipedia Evaluating the Linguistic Coverage of OpenAlex: An Assessment of Metadata Accuracy and Completeness Towards understanding evolution of science through language model series Ensuring Adherence to Standards in Experiment-Related Metadata Entered Via Spreadsheets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1