恢复思维的敏捷性:在数字学校教育背景下阅读卡尔维诺

IF 0.9 4区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Studies in Philosophy and Education Pub Date : 2024-08-19 DOI:10.1007/s11217-024-09949-0
Samira Alirezabeigi, Sara Magaraggia
{"title":"恢复思维的敏捷性:在数字学校教育背景下阅读卡尔维诺","authors":"Samira Alirezabeigi, Sara Magaraggia","doi":"10.1007/s11217-024-09949-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Calvino’s reflection on <i>quickness</i> brings the reader through a zig-zag journey without a predefined destination, crossing the history of literature in order to think about writing and the relationship between physical speed and speed of mind. To discuss <i>quickness</i> as a virtue, Calvino refers to the potentiality of human reasoning and typifies different styles of thought. Elaborating on <i>quickness</i> as a quality and a virtue in the contemporary societal and more particularly educational context which is conceptualized as “accelerated time” (Rosa <i>Social Acceleration: A New Theory of Modernity</i>, 2013) and “network time” (Hassan <i>Time &amp; Society</i> 12:226–241, 2003) might at first glance seem somewhat irrelevant. However, the pressing relevance of this virtue lies precisely in the digitized direction which school education is faced with. The shift towards digital school education bears the implication of decoupling the space and time of education from the here and now of the classroom. This, on the flip side means allowing global events as well as personal happenings of the teacher and students to enter the classroom, leading the lesson time to become a poly-synchronous time. That is against this contemporary background of digital education that this article attempts to relate to Calvino’s understanding of quickness. The article embarks on characterizing four aspects of Calvino’s reading of quickness and problematizes their manifestation in the current digital school education climate and finally, it seeks to open some concrete horizons for re-introducing quickness as a virtue for education in the digital age.</p>","PeriodicalId":47069,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Philosophy and Education","volume":"431 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reclaiming Quickness of Thought: Reading Calvino in the Context of Digital School Education\",\"authors\":\"Samira Alirezabeigi, Sara Magaraggia\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11217-024-09949-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Calvino’s reflection on <i>quickness</i> brings the reader through a zig-zag journey without a predefined destination, crossing the history of literature in order to think about writing and the relationship between physical speed and speed of mind. To discuss <i>quickness</i> as a virtue, Calvino refers to the potentiality of human reasoning and typifies different styles of thought. Elaborating on <i>quickness</i> as a quality and a virtue in the contemporary societal and more particularly educational context which is conceptualized as “accelerated time” (Rosa <i>Social Acceleration: A New Theory of Modernity</i>, 2013) and “network time” (Hassan <i>Time &amp; Society</i> 12:226–241, 2003) might at first glance seem somewhat irrelevant. However, the pressing relevance of this virtue lies precisely in the digitized direction which school education is faced with. The shift towards digital school education bears the implication of decoupling the space and time of education from the here and now of the classroom. This, on the flip side means allowing global events as well as personal happenings of the teacher and students to enter the classroom, leading the lesson time to become a poly-synchronous time. That is against this contemporary background of digital education that this article attempts to relate to Calvino’s understanding of quickness. The article embarks on characterizing four aspects of Calvino’s reading of quickness and problematizes their manifestation in the current digital school education climate and finally, it seeks to open some concrete horizons for re-introducing quickness as a virtue for education in the digital age.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Philosophy and Education\",\"volume\":\"431 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Philosophy and Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-024-09949-0\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Philosophy and Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-024-09949-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

卡尔维诺对 "快 "的思考将读者带入了一个没有预设目的地的 "之 "字形旅程,穿越文学史,思考写作以及身体速度与思维速度之间的关系。在讨论 "快 "作为一种美德时,卡尔维诺提到了人类推理的潜力,并对不同的思维方式进行了典型化。在被概念化为 "加速时间"(Rosa Social Acceleration: A New Theory of Modernity,2013)和 "网络时间"(Hassan Time & Society 12:226-241,2003)的当代社会,尤其是教育背景下,将敏捷作为一种品质和美德进行阐述,乍一看似乎有些不着边际。然而,这一美德的迫切现实意义恰恰在于学校教育所面临的数字化方向。学校教育向数字化的转变意味着教育的时空与课堂的此时此地脱钩。这反过来意味着允许全球事件以及教师和学生的个人事件进入课堂,导致上课时间成为多同步时间。本文正是在这一数字教育的时代背景下,试图将卡尔维诺对 "快 "的理解联系起来。文章从卡尔维诺对 "快 "的解读的四个方面入手,对其在当前数字化学校教育环境中的表现进行了问题分析,最后试图为数字化时代的教育重新引入 "快 "这一美德打开一些具体的视野。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reclaiming Quickness of Thought: Reading Calvino in the Context of Digital School Education

Calvino’s reflection on quickness brings the reader through a zig-zag journey without a predefined destination, crossing the history of literature in order to think about writing and the relationship between physical speed and speed of mind. To discuss quickness as a virtue, Calvino refers to the potentiality of human reasoning and typifies different styles of thought. Elaborating on quickness as a quality and a virtue in the contemporary societal and more particularly educational context which is conceptualized as “accelerated time” (Rosa Social Acceleration: A New Theory of Modernity, 2013) and “network time” (Hassan Time & Society 12:226–241, 2003) might at first glance seem somewhat irrelevant. However, the pressing relevance of this virtue lies precisely in the digitized direction which school education is faced with. The shift towards digital school education bears the implication of decoupling the space and time of education from the here and now of the classroom. This, on the flip side means allowing global events as well as personal happenings of the teacher and students to enter the classroom, leading the lesson time to become a poly-synchronous time. That is against this contemporary background of digital education that this article attempts to relate to Calvino’s understanding of quickness. The article embarks on characterizing four aspects of Calvino’s reading of quickness and problematizes their manifestation in the current digital school education climate and finally, it seeks to open some concrete horizons for re-introducing quickness as a virtue for education in the digital age.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Studies in Philosophy and Education is an international peer-reviewed journal that focuses on the philosophical, theoretical, normative and conceptual problems and issues in educational research, policy and practice. As such, Studies in Philosophy and Education is not the expression of any one philosophical or theoretical school or cultural tradition. Rather, the journal promotes exchange and collaboration among philosophers, philosophers of education, educational and social science researchers, and educational policy makers throughout the world. Contributions that address this wide audience, while clearly presenting a philosophical argument and reflecting standards of academic excellence, are encouraged. Topics may range widely from important methodological issues in educational research as shaped by the philosophy of science to substantive educational policy problems as shaped by moral and social and political philosophy and educational theory. In addition, single issues of the journal are occasionally devoted to the critical discussion of a special topic of educational and philosophical importance. There is also a frequent Reviews and Rejoinders’ section, featuring book review essays with replies from the authors.
期刊最新文献
What’s the Sense of a Classroom? Sensory Perception in Classrooms and Relationships with Nature in the Wake of COVID-19 Education, Pedagogy, & the ‘F’ Word Reclaiming Quickness of Thought: Reading Calvino in the Context of Digital School Education Teaching as Epistemic Mistrust Thematic Coherence in Classroom Discourse: A Question Centered Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1