知识的殖民性与自主知识传统

IF 3.1 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY Sociology Compass Pub Date : 2024-08-23 DOI:10.1111/soc4.13256
Syed Farid Alatas
{"title":"知识的殖民性与自主知识传统","authors":"Syed Farid Alatas","doi":"10.1111/soc4.13256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An autonomous social science tradition is one in which knowledge creation takes place amidst consciousness of the psychological and structural obstacles that mental captivity and intellectual imperialism present to students, academics, and people in general. The limitations imposed by the structure of intellectual imperialism and the ubiquity of the captive mind allow for various hegemonic orientations to dominate knowledge creation in such a way that limits originality in terms of the choice of research problems, the application of theories and concepts, and the use of methods of data collection and modes of argumentation. This article defines autonomous knowledge, and discusses the hegemonic orientations that autonomous knowledge seeks to gain autonomy from.","PeriodicalId":47997,"journal":{"name":"Sociology Compass","volume":"111 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Coloniality of Knowledge and the Autonomous Knowledge Tradition\",\"authors\":\"Syed Farid Alatas\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/soc4.13256\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An autonomous social science tradition is one in which knowledge creation takes place amidst consciousness of the psychological and structural obstacles that mental captivity and intellectual imperialism present to students, academics, and people in general. The limitations imposed by the structure of intellectual imperialism and the ubiquity of the captive mind allow for various hegemonic orientations to dominate knowledge creation in such a way that limits originality in terms of the choice of research problems, the application of theories and concepts, and the use of methods of data collection and modes of argumentation. This article defines autonomous knowledge, and discusses the hegemonic orientations that autonomous knowledge seeks to gain autonomy from.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sociology Compass\",\"volume\":\"111 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sociology Compass\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.13256\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociology Compass","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.13256","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自主的社会科学传统是指,知识的创造是在意识到精神俘虏和知识帝国主义给学生、学者和一般人带来的心理和结构性障碍的情况下进行的。知识帝国主义的结构和无处不在的精神俘虏所带来的限制,使得各种霸权取向在知识创造中占据主导地位,从而在研究问题的选择、理论和概念的应用以及数据收集方法和论证模式的使用等方面限制了原创性。本文对自主知识进行了定义,并讨论了自主知识力图摆脱的霸权取向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Coloniality of Knowledge and the Autonomous Knowledge Tradition
An autonomous social science tradition is one in which knowledge creation takes place amidst consciousness of the psychological and structural obstacles that mental captivity and intellectual imperialism present to students, academics, and people in general. The limitations imposed by the structure of intellectual imperialism and the ubiquity of the captive mind allow for various hegemonic orientations to dominate knowledge creation in such a way that limits originality in terms of the choice of research problems, the application of theories and concepts, and the use of methods of data collection and modes of argumentation. This article defines autonomous knowledge, and discusses the hegemonic orientations that autonomous knowledge seeks to gain autonomy from.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sociology Compass
Sociology Compass SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
102
期刊最新文献
Critical Challenges to the Sociology of Work: From a Perspective of Russian Labor Studies Visual Analysis and the Contentious Politics of the Radical Right Caring Technologies: Confronting Invisible Work in Digital Capitalism Unlocking the Potential of the Decolonial Approach in Migration Studies Everyday Conversations About Economic Inequality: A Research Agenda
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1