比较低牛顿粘度和高牛顿粘度下烷烃剪切稀化的现象学模型

IF 2.9 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL Tribology Letters Pub Date : 2024-09-04 DOI:10.1007/s11249-024-01908-7
Wenhui Li, Vikram Jadhao
{"title":"比较低牛顿粘度和高牛顿粘度下烷烃剪切稀化的现象学模型","authors":"Wenhui Li,&nbsp;Vikram Jadhao","doi":"10.1007/s11249-024-01908-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There is an ongoing debate concerning the best rheological model for fluids sheared in elastohydrodynamic lubrication (EHL) where high pressures lead to a dramatic rise in Newtonian viscosity and high strain rates lead to pronounced shear thinning. Two classes of phenomenological models at the center of this debate are based on the work of Eyring and Carreau. We use intermediate scaling plots and a justification criterion proposed by Gao and Müser in a recent article (Tribol Lett 72(1):16, 2024) to evaluate the fitting of Eyring, Carreau, and Carreau–Yasuda (CY) models to rheological data on the shear thinning of squalane, a model EHL fluid, at 293 K over a wide range of pressures <span>\\(P \\in (0.1,955)\\)</span> MPa that change the Newtonian viscosity <span>\\(\\eta _0\\)</span> of squalane from <span>\\(\\sim 10\\)</span> to <span>\\(\\sim 10^7\\)</span> mPa s. The justification criterion enables a fair comparison of Eyring, Carreau, and CY models that have two, three, and four fitting parameters, respectively. We find that the use of Eyring model to describe shear thinning of squalane is justified over Carreau model and CY model with crossover parameter <span>\\(a&gt;1\\)</span> for <span>\\(\\eta _0 &gt; 10^2\\)</span> mPa s and <span>\\(\\eta _0 &gt; 10^3\\)</span> mPa s, respectively. The unrestricted CY model produces <span>\\(a&lt;1\\)</span> in all fits and fares better but is not justified over Eyring for squalane sheared at high Newtonian viscosities <span>\\(\\eta _0 &gt; 10^4\\)</span> mPa s. More importantly, CY models fitted with <span>\\(a&lt;1\\)</span> fail to produce a physical low-rate asymptotic behavior and an appropriate crossover to Newtonian flow. Our findings show that CY models with <span>\\(a &gt; 1\\)</span> guarantee a proper description of the crossover from shear thinning to Newtonian zone, and should be the phenomenological model of choice for shear thinning at low pressures. As pressure rises and <span>\\(\\eta _0\\)</span> becomes large (e.g., <span>\\(&gt; 10^3\\)</span> mPa s for squalane), the use of Eyring model to describe shear thinning is justified.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":806,"journal":{"name":"Tribology Letters","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing Phenomenological Models of Shear Thinning of Alkanes at Low and High Newtonian Viscosities\",\"authors\":\"Wenhui Li,&nbsp;Vikram Jadhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11249-024-01908-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>There is an ongoing debate concerning the best rheological model for fluids sheared in elastohydrodynamic lubrication (EHL) where high pressures lead to a dramatic rise in Newtonian viscosity and high strain rates lead to pronounced shear thinning. Two classes of phenomenological models at the center of this debate are based on the work of Eyring and Carreau. We use intermediate scaling plots and a justification criterion proposed by Gao and Müser in a recent article (Tribol Lett 72(1):16, 2024) to evaluate the fitting of Eyring, Carreau, and Carreau–Yasuda (CY) models to rheological data on the shear thinning of squalane, a model EHL fluid, at 293 K over a wide range of pressures <span>\\\\(P \\\\in (0.1,955)\\\\)</span> MPa that change the Newtonian viscosity <span>\\\\(\\\\eta _0\\\\)</span> of squalane from <span>\\\\(\\\\sim 10\\\\)</span> to <span>\\\\(\\\\sim 10^7\\\\)</span> mPa s. The justification criterion enables a fair comparison of Eyring, Carreau, and CY models that have two, three, and four fitting parameters, respectively. We find that the use of Eyring model to describe shear thinning of squalane is justified over Carreau model and CY model with crossover parameter <span>\\\\(a&gt;1\\\\)</span> for <span>\\\\(\\\\eta _0 &gt; 10^2\\\\)</span> mPa s and <span>\\\\(\\\\eta _0 &gt; 10^3\\\\)</span> mPa s, respectively. The unrestricted CY model produces <span>\\\\(a&lt;1\\\\)</span> in all fits and fares better but is not justified over Eyring for squalane sheared at high Newtonian viscosities <span>\\\\(\\\\eta _0 &gt; 10^4\\\\)</span> mPa s. More importantly, CY models fitted with <span>\\\\(a&lt;1\\\\)</span> fail to produce a physical low-rate asymptotic behavior and an appropriate crossover to Newtonian flow. Our findings show that CY models with <span>\\\\(a &gt; 1\\\\)</span> guarantee a proper description of the crossover from shear thinning to Newtonian zone, and should be the phenomenological model of choice for shear thinning at low pressures. As pressure rises and <span>\\\\(\\\\eta _0\\\\)</span> becomes large (e.g., <span>\\\\(&gt; 10^3\\\\)</span> mPa s for squalane), the use of Eyring model to describe shear thinning is justified.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tribology Letters\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tribology Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11249-024-01908-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tribology Letters","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11249-024-01908-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在弹性流体动力润滑(EHL)中,高压会导致牛顿粘度急剧上升,而高应变率则会导致明显的剪切稀化,关于在这种情况下剪切流体的最佳流变学模型一直存在争论。处于这一争论中心的两类现象学模型是基于 Eyring 和 Carreau 的研究成果。我们使用中间缩放图以及 Gao 和 Müser 在最近的一篇文章(Tribol Lett 72(1):16, 2024)中提出的合理性标准,来评估 Eyring、Carreau 和 Carreau-Yasuda (CY) 模型与模型 EHL 流体角鲨烷在 293 K 的剪切稀化流变学数据的拟合情况。我们发现,使用 Eyring、Carreau 和 CY 模型,分别有两个、三个和四个拟合参数。我们发现,对于 \(\eta _0 > 10^2\) mPa s 和 \(\(\eta _0 > 10^3\) mPa s,使用 Eyring 模型描述角鲨烷的剪切稀化比使用交叉参数 \(a>1\) 的 Carreau 模型和 CY 模型更合理。更重要的是,用\(a<1\)拟合的 CY 模型不能产生物理的低速率渐近行为和与牛顿流体的适当交叉。我们的研究结果表明,用(a > 1\ )拟合的CY模型可以保证正确描述从剪切稀化到牛顿区的交叉,应该成为低压下剪切稀化现象学模型的首选。随着压力的升高,\(eta _0\)变得很大(例如,角鲨烷的\(> 10^3\s) mPa s),使用 Eyring 模型来描述剪切变稀是合理的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparing Phenomenological Models of Shear Thinning of Alkanes at Low and High Newtonian Viscosities

There is an ongoing debate concerning the best rheological model for fluids sheared in elastohydrodynamic lubrication (EHL) where high pressures lead to a dramatic rise in Newtonian viscosity and high strain rates lead to pronounced shear thinning. Two classes of phenomenological models at the center of this debate are based on the work of Eyring and Carreau. We use intermediate scaling plots and a justification criterion proposed by Gao and Müser in a recent article (Tribol Lett 72(1):16, 2024) to evaluate the fitting of Eyring, Carreau, and Carreau–Yasuda (CY) models to rheological data on the shear thinning of squalane, a model EHL fluid, at 293 K over a wide range of pressures \(P \in (0.1,955)\) MPa that change the Newtonian viscosity \(\eta _0\) of squalane from \(\sim 10\) to \(\sim 10^7\) mPa s. The justification criterion enables a fair comparison of Eyring, Carreau, and CY models that have two, three, and four fitting parameters, respectively. We find that the use of Eyring model to describe shear thinning of squalane is justified over Carreau model and CY model with crossover parameter \(a>1\) for \(\eta _0 > 10^2\) mPa s and \(\eta _0 > 10^3\) mPa s, respectively. The unrestricted CY model produces \(a<1\) in all fits and fares better but is not justified over Eyring for squalane sheared at high Newtonian viscosities \(\eta _0 > 10^4\) mPa s. More importantly, CY models fitted with \(a<1\) fail to produce a physical low-rate asymptotic behavior and an appropriate crossover to Newtonian flow. Our findings show that CY models with \(a > 1\) guarantee a proper description of the crossover from shear thinning to Newtonian zone, and should be the phenomenological model of choice for shear thinning at low pressures. As pressure rises and \(\eta _0\) becomes large (e.g., \(> 10^3\) mPa s for squalane), the use of Eyring model to describe shear thinning is justified.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tribology Letters
Tribology Letters 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
9.40%
发文量
116
审稿时长
2.5 months
期刊介绍: Tribology Letters is devoted to the development of the science of tribology and its applications, particularly focusing on publishing high-quality papers at the forefront of tribological science and that address the fundamentals of friction, lubrication, wear, or adhesion. The journal facilitates communication and exchange of seminal ideas among thousands of practitioners who are engaged worldwide in the pursuit of tribology-based science and technology.
期刊最新文献
Wear Mechanism and Wear Debris Characterization of ULWPE in Multidirectional Motion Cobalt- and Chromium-Oxide-Based Coatings: Thermally Spraying a Glaze Layer Visualization of Structural Deformation of Polymer Additives in Oil Under High Shear Flow Influence of Variable-Depth Groove Texture on the Friction and Wear Performance of GCr15–SiC Friction Pairs Under Water Lubrication The Flow of Lubricant as a Mist in the Piston Assembly and Crankcase of a Fired Gasoline Engine: The Effect of Viscosity Modifier and the Link to Lubricant Degradation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1