美国和加拿大商业银行采用金融科技的风险、法规和影响:比较分析

IF 2.2 Q3 BUSINESS Thunderbird International Business Review Pub Date : 2024-08-12 DOI:10.1002/tie.22404
Lamia Kalai, Mohamed Toukabri
{"title":"美国和加拿大商业银行采用金融科技的风险、法规和影响:比较分析","authors":"Lamia Kalai,&nbsp;Mohamed Toukabri","doi":"10.1002/tie.22404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The growth of FinTech has increasingly attracted the attention of financial industry players. The speed and complexity with which new financial technologies have spread around the world have created regulatory challenges for the United States and Canadian authorities. Unlike the United States, where there is regulatory fragmentation and a supervisory instrument with regulatory relief, Canada has a more integrated regulatory approach managed by regulatory sandbox principles. The aim of this article is to study and compare the impact of FinTech adoption on commercial banks over the 2018–2023 period in the United States and Canadian FinTech ecosystems. The results essentially show that FinTech has a positive impact on commercial banks' performance and financial growth, and a negative impact on liquidity and financial risk. Our results present several contributions and mainly show that: (1) In the presence of multiple entry channels for FinTech startups, the impact of FinTech on financial performance is higher in the United States than in Canada. (2) Because of its regulatory approach, Canada lags behind the United States in the adoption rate of financial technologies. (3) Balance of power in the financial sector induces commercial banks not to consider FinTech startups as threats but rather as partners that offer opportunities for expertise and reduced regulatory costs. Finally, FinTech can be disruptive and presents many challenges for regulators given the complexity and speed of innovation it promotes.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47515,"journal":{"name":"Thunderbird International Business Review","volume":"66 6","pages":"609-641"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risks, Regulations, and Impacts of FinTech Adoption on Commercial Banks in the United States and Canada: A Comparative Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Lamia Kalai,&nbsp;Mohamed Toukabri\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/tie.22404\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>The growth of FinTech has increasingly attracted the attention of financial industry players. The speed and complexity with which new financial technologies have spread around the world have created regulatory challenges for the United States and Canadian authorities. Unlike the United States, where there is regulatory fragmentation and a supervisory instrument with regulatory relief, Canada has a more integrated regulatory approach managed by regulatory sandbox principles. The aim of this article is to study and compare the impact of FinTech adoption on commercial banks over the 2018–2023 period in the United States and Canadian FinTech ecosystems. The results essentially show that FinTech has a positive impact on commercial banks' performance and financial growth, and a negative impact on liquidity and financial risk. Our results present several contributions and mainly show that: (1) In the presence of multiple entry channels for FinTech startups, the impact of FinTech on financial performance is higher in the United States than in Canada. (2) Because of its regulatory approach, Canada lags behind the United States in the adoption rate of financial technologies. (3) Balance of power in the financial sector induces commercial banks not to consider FinTech startups as threats but rather as partners that offer opportunities for expertise and reduced regulatory costs. Finally, FinTech can be disruptive and presents many challenges for regulators given the complexity and speed of innovation it promotes.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47515,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Thunderbird International Business Review\",\"volume\":\"66 6\",\"pages\":\"609-641\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Thunderbird International Business Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tie.22404\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thunderbird International Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/tie.22404","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

金融科技的发展日益引起金融业参与者的关注。新金融技术在全球传播的速度和复杂性给美国和加拿大当局带来了监管挑战。美国存在监管分散和监管救济的监管工具,而加拿大则不同,它采用了一种由监管沙盒原则管理的更为综合的监管方法。本文旨在研究和比较 2018-2023 年期间美国和加拿大金融科技生态系统采用金融科技对商业银行的影响。结果基本表明,金融科技对商业银行的业绩和财务增长有积极影响,对流动性和财务风险有消极影响。我们的研究结果有几个方面的贡献,主要表现在(1)在金融科技初创企业有多种进入渠道的情况下,美国金融科技对财务业绩的影响高于加拿大。(2)由于其监管方式,加拿大在金融科技的采用率方面落后于美国。(3) 金融部门的权力平衡促使商业银行不把金融科技初创企业视为威胁,而是将其视为合作伙伴,为其提供专业知识和降低监管成本的机会。最后,金融科技可能具有破坏性,鉴于其促进创新的复杂性和速度,给监管机构带来了许多挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Risks, Regulations, and Impacts of FinTech Adoption on Commercial Banks in the United States and Canada: A Comparative Analysis

The growth of FinTech has increasingly attracted the attention of financial industry players. The speed and complexity with which new financial technologies have spread around the world have created regulatory challenges for the United States and Canadian authorities. Unlike the United States, where there is regulatory fragmentation and a supervisory instrument with regulatory relief, Canada has a more integrated regulatory approach managed by regulatory sandbox principles. The aim of this article is to study and compare the impact of FinTech adoption on commercial banks over the 2018–2023 period in the United States and Canadian FinTech ecosystems. The results essentially show that FinTech has a positive impact on commercial banks' performance and financial growth, and a negative impact on liquidity and financial risk. Our results present several contributions and mainly show that: (1) In the presence of multiple entry channels for FinTech startups, the impact of FinTech on financial performance is higher in the United States than in Canada. (2) Because of its regulatory approach, Canada lags behind the United States in the adoption rate of financial technologies. (3) Balance of power in the financial sector induces commercial banks not to consider FinTech startups as threats but rather as partners that offer opportunities for expertise and reduced regulatory costs. Finally, FinTech can be disruptive and presents many challenges for regulators given the complexity and speed of innovation it promotes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: Thunderbird International Business Review is a peer-reviewed journal that is published six times a year in cooperation with the Thunderbird School of Global Business Management, the world"s leading institution in the education of global managers. The journal"s aim is to advance and disseminate research in the field of international business. Its main target audience includes academicians and executives in business and government who have an interest in international business.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information Stimuli Behind SMEs' Export Decisions: Evidence From an Emerging Country During the COVID‐19 Pandemic Subnational Institutional Differences and FDI Spillovers Behind the R&D–Performance Relationship in Russia Trapped in Grandiosity? Narcissistic CEOs and Risk‐Taking in MENA Banks: The Moderating Effect of CEO Attributes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1