COVID-19 疫苗:过敏性休克和焦虑症

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI:10.1007/s00508-024-02435-0
Andrea R. Teufelberger, Andrada-Renata Dan, Linda Irmler, Peter Wolf, Birger Kränke
{"title":"COVID-19 疫苗:过敏性休克和焦虑症","authors":"Andrea R. Teufelberger, Andrada-Renata Dan, Linda Irmler, Peter Wolf, Birger Kränke","doi":"10.1007/s00508-024-02435-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Vaccination against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was one crucial element to overcome the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Even though anaphylaxis to vaccines is rare, 47 patients came to the Allergy Unit at the University Hospital Graz, Austria, reporting immediate anaphylactoid symptoms after administration of COVID-19 vaccines. In addition, 29 patients with known drug-induced anaphylaxis wanted to be tested for a possible sensitization against COVID-19 vaccines or excipients, such as polyethylene glycol (PEG) or polysorbate 80 (PS80) before the first COVID-19 vaccination. Skin prick tests and intradermal tests were performed in all 76 patients, mostly using PEG 2000, and/or PS80. Skin prick tests with COVID-19 vaccines were performed depending on availability.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Objective</h3><p>Our aim was to characterize this patient cohort in terms of patients’ anaphylactoid responses, their willingness to future vaccinations against SARS-Cov‑2, and reasons for their decision.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>We developed a questionnaire and analyzed 34 completed copies.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Of the 47 patients with anaphylactoid reactions to COVID-19 vaccination, most were female (40 female/7 male). The skin tests, even when performed with the respective COVID-19 vaccine, were negative in all but one patient. Most patients who experienced anaphylactoid reactions after a COVID-19 vaccination, did not want another COVID-19 vaccination at the time of answering the questionnaire because of anxiety for another anaphylactoid response at the next shot. Premedication with antihistamines significantly lowered (<i>n</i> = 74 vaccinations) the severity of anaphylactoid responses after COVID-19 vaccinations.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Anxiety about another anaphylactoid episode hinders patients to be vaccinated against SARS-CoV‑2 again. Premedication with antihistamines and collaboration of allergologists with psychologists might lower the risk of an anaphylactic/anaphylactoid response as well anxiety in drug-induced anaphylactic patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23861,"journal":{"name":"Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COVID-19 vaccines: anaphylaxis and anxiety\",\"authors\":\"Andrea R. Teufelberger, Andrada-Renata Dan, Linda Irmler, Peter Wolf, Birger Kränke\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00508-024-02435-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Background</h3><p>Vaccination against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was one crucial element to overcome the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Even though anaphylaxis to vaccines is rare, 47 patients came to the Allergy Unit at the University Hospital Graz, Austria, reporting immediate anaphylactoid symptoms after administration of COVID-19 vaccines. In addition, 29 patients with known drug-induced anaphylaxis wanted to be tested for a possible sensitization against COVID-19 vaccines or excipients, such as polyethylene glycol (PEG) or polysorbate 80 (PS80) before the first COVID-19 vaccination. Skin prick tests and intradermal tests were performed in all 76 patients, mostly using PEG 2000, and/or PS80. Skin prick tests with COVID-19 vaccines were performed depending on availability.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Objective</h3><p>Our aim was to characterize this patient cohort in terms of patients’ anaphylactoid responses, their willingness to future vaccinations against SARS-Cov‑2, and reasons for their decision.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>We developed a questionnaire and analyzed 34 completed copies.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>Of the 47 patients with anaphylactoid reactions to COVID-19 vaccination, most were female (40 female/7 male). The skin tests, even when performed with the respective COVID-19 vaccine, were negative in all but one patient. Most patients who experienced anaphylactoid reactions after a COVID-19 vaccination, did not want another COVID-19 vaccination at the time of answering the questionnaire because of anxiety for another anaphylactoid response at the next shot. Premedication with antihistamines significantly lowered (<i>n</i> = 74 vaccinations) the severity of anaphylactoid responses after COVID-19 vaccinations.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusion</h3><p>Anxiety about another anaphylactoid episode hinders patients to be vaccinated against SARS-CoV‑2 again. Premedication with antihistamines and collaboration of allergologists with psychologists might lower the risk of an anaphylactic/anaphylactoid response as well anxiety in drug-induced anaphylactic patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-024-02435-0\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00508-024-02435-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景接种严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒 2 型(SARS-CoV-2)疫苗是战胜 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行的关键因素之一。尽管疫苗过敏性休克十分罕见,但奥地利格拉茨大学医院过敏科仍有 47 名患者在接种 COVID-19 疫苗后立即出现过敏性休克症状。此外,29 名已知有药物诱发过敏性休克的患者希望在首次接种 COVID-19 疫苗前检测是否可能对 COVID-19 疫苗或辅料(如聚乙二醇 (PEG) 或聚山梨醇酯 80 (PS80))过敏。对所有 76 名患者进行了皮肤点刺试验和皮内试验,其中大部分使用了 PEG 2000 和/或 PS80。我们的目的是从患者的过敏性反应、他们今后接种 SARS-Cov-2 疫苗的意愿以及他们做出这一决定的原因等方面来描述这一患者群体。除一名患者外,其他所有患者的皮试结果均为阴性,即使是接种了相应的 COVID-19 疫苗。大多数在接种 COVID-19 疫苗后出现过敏反应的患者在回答问卷时都不希望再次接种 COVID-19 疫苗,因为他们担心下一针会再次出现过敏反应。结论 对再次出现过敏性反应的焦虑阻碍了患者再次接种SARS-CoV-2疫苗。使用抗组胺药进行预治疗以及过敏学家与心理学家的合作可能会降低过敏性反应/类过敏反应的风险以及药物诱发的过敏性反应患者的焦虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 vaccines: anaphylaxis and anxiety

Background

Vaccination against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2 (SARS-CoV-2) was one crucial element to overcome the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Even though anaphylaxis to vaccines is rare, 47 patients came to the Allergy Unit at the University Hospital Graz, Austria, reporting immediate anaphylactoid symptoms after administration of COVID-19 vaccines. In addition, 29 patients with known drug-induced anaphylaxis wanted to be tested for a possible sensitization against COVID-19 vaccines or excipients, such as polyethylene glycol (PEG) or polysorbate 80 (PS80) before the first COVID-19 vaccination. Skin prick tests and intradermal tests were performed in all 76 patients, mostly using PEG 2000, and/or PS80. Skin prick tests with COVID-19 vaccines were performed depending on availability.

Objective

Our aim was to characterize this patient cohort in terms of patients’ anaphylactoid responses, their willingness to future vaccinations against SARS-Cov‑2, and reasons for their decision.

Methods

We developed a questionnaire and analyzed 34 completed copies.

Results

Of the 47 patients with anaphylactoid reactions to COVID-19 vaccination, most were female (40 female/7 male). The skin tests, even when performed with the respective COVID-19 vaccine, were negative in all but one patient. Most patients who experienced anaphylactoid reactions after a COVID-19 vaccination, did not want another COVID-19 vaccination at the time of answering the questionnaire because of anxiety for another anaphylactoid response at the next shot. Premedication with antihistamines significantly lowered (n = 74 vaccinations) the severity of anaphylactoid responses after COVID-19 vaccinations.

Conclusion

Anxiety about another anaphylactoid episode hinders patients to be vaccinated against SARS-CoV‑2 again. Premedication with antihistamines and collaboration of allergologists with psychologists might lower the risk of an anaphylactic/anaphylactoid response as well anxiety in drug-induced anaphylactic patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift
Wiener Klinische Wochenschrift 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.80%
发文量
110
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Wiener klinische Wochenschrift - The Central European Journal of Medicine - is an international scientific medical journal covering the entire spectrum of clinical medicine and related areas such as ethics in medicine, public health and the history of medicine. In addition to original articles, the Journal features editorials and leading articles on newly emerging topics, review articles, case reports and a broad range of special articles. Experimental material will be considered for publication if it is directly relevant to clinical medicine. The number of international contributions has been steadily increasing. Consequently, the international reputation of the journal has grown in the past several years. Founded in 1888, the Wiener klinische Wochenschrift - The Central European Journal of Medicine - is certainly one of the most prestigious medical journals in the world and takes pride in having been the first publisher of landmarks in medicine.
期刊最新文献
Gastrointestinal function and pain outcomes following segmental resection or discoid resection for low rectal endometriosis. Olfaction and thyroid hormones in patients with subjective cognitive decline, non-amnestic and amnestic mild cognitive impairment Neurofibromatosis type 1 adult surveillance form for Austria COVID-19 vaccines: anaphylaxis and anxiety Deciphering the role of lactate as a prognostic indicator in pediatric diabetic ketoacidosis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1