眼科大型语言模型的伦理考虑因素。

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY Current Opinion in Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-08-27 DOI:10.1097/icu.0000000000001083
Fritz Gerald P Kalaw,Sally L Baxter
{"title":"眼科大型语言模型的伦理考虑因素。","authors":"Fritz Gerald P Kalaw,Sally L Baxter","doi":"10.1097/icu.0000000000001083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PURPOSE OF REVIEW\r\nThis review aims to summarize and discuss the ethical considerations regarding large language model (LLM) use in the field of ophthalmology.\r\n\r\nRECENT FINDINGS\r\nThis review of 47 articles on LLM applications in ophthalmology highlights their diverse potential uses, including education, research, clinical decision support, and surgical assistance (as an aid in operative notes). We also review ethical considerations such as the inability of LLMs to interpret data accurately, the risk of promoting controversial or harmful recommendations, and breaches of data privacy. These concerns imply the need for cautious integration of artificial intelligence in healthcare, emphasizing human oversight, transparency, and accountability to mitigate risks and uphold ethical standards.\r\n\r\nSUMMARY\r\nThe integration of LLMs in ophthalmology offers potential advantages such as aiding in clinical decision support and facilitating medical education through their ability to process queries and analyze ophthalmic imaging and clinical cases. However, their utilization also raises ethical concerns regarding data privacy, potential misinformation, and biases inherent in the datasets used. Awareness of these concerns should be addressed in order to optimize its utility in the healthcare setting. More importantly, promoting responsible and careful use by consumers should be practiced.","PeriodicalId":50604,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Ophthalmology","volume":"73 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethical considerations for large language models in ophthalmology.\",\"authors\":\"Fritz Gerald P Kalaw,Sally L Baxter\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/icu.0000000000001083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PURPOSE OF REVIEW\\r\\nThis review aims to summarize and discuss the ethical considerations regarding large language model (LLM) use in the field of ophthalmology.\\r\\n\\r\\nRECENT FINDINGS\\r\\nThis review of 47 articles on LLM applications in ophthalmology highlights their diverse potential uses, including education, research, clinical decision support, and surgical assistance (as an aid in operative notes). We also review ethical considerations such as the inability of LLMs to interpret data accurately, the risk of promoting controversial or harmful recommendations, and breaches of data privacy. These concerns imply the need for cautious integration of artificial intelligence in healthcare, emphasizing human oversight, transparency, and accountability to mitigate risks and uphold ethical standards.\\r\\n\\r\\nSUMMARY\\r\\nThe integration of LLMs in ophthalmology offers potential advantages such as aiding in clinical decision support and facilitating medical education through their ability to process queries and analyze ophthalmic imaging and clinical cases. However, their utilization also raises ethical concerns regarding data privacy, potential misinformation, and biases inherent in the datasets used. Awareness of these concerns should be addressed in order to optimize its utility in the healthcare setting. More importantly, promoting responsible and careful use by consumers should be practiced.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50604,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Opinion in Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"73 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Opinion in Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/icu.0000000000001083\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/icu.0000000000001083","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本综述旨在总结和讨论有关眼科领域使用大型语言模型(LLM)的伦理考虑因素。最新发现本综述共收录了 47 篇有关 LLM 在眼科领域应用的文章,重点介绍了 LLM 的多种潜在用途,包括教育、研究、临床决策支持和手术辅助(作为手术笔记的辅助工具)。我们还回顾了伦理方面的考虑,如 LLM 无法准确解释数据、推广有争议或有害建议的风险以及侵犯数据隐私等。这些问题表明,有必要谨慎地将人工智能应用于医疗保健领域,同时强调人工监督、透明度和问责制,以降低风险并维护道德标准。摘要将 LLMs 应用于眼科具有潜在的优势,例如通过其处理查询和分析眼科成像及临床病例的能力,可协助临床决策支持并促进医学教育。不过,使用这些数据集也会引发有关数据隐私、潜在错误信息和固有偏差的伦理问题。为了优化数据集在医疗环境中的应用,我们应该意识到这些问题。更重要的是,应提倡消费者负责任地谨慎使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ethical considerations for large language models in ophthalmology.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review aims to summarize and discuss the ethical considerations regarding large language model (LLM) use in the field of ophthalmology. RECENT FINDINGS This review of 47 articles on LLM applications in ophthalmology highlights their diverse potential uses, including education, research, clinical decision support, and surgical assistance (as an aid in operative notes). We also review ethical considerations such as the inability of LLMs to interpret data accurately, the risk of promoting controversial or harmful recommendations, and breaches of data privacy. These concerns imply the need for cautious integration of artificial intelligence in healthcare, emphasizing human oversight, transparency, and accountability to mitigate risks and uphold ethical standards. SUMMARY The integration of LLMs in ophthalmology offers potential advantages such as aiding in clinical decision support and facilitating medical education through their ability to process queries and analyze ophthalmic imaging and clinical cases. However, their utilization also raises ethical concerns regarding data privacy, potential misinformation, and biases inherent in the datasets used. Awareness of these concerns should be addressed in order to optimize its utility in the healthcare setting. More importantly, promoting responsible and careful use by consumers should be practiced.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.40%
发文量
120
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Ophthalmology is an indispensable resource featuring key up-to-date and important advances in the field from around the world. With renowned guest editors for each section, every bimonthly issue of Current Opinion in Ophthalmology delivers a fresh insight into topics such as glaucoma, refractive surgery and corneal and external disorders. With ten sections in total, the journal provides a convenient and thorough review of the field and will be of interest to researchers, clinicians and other healthcare professionals alike.
期刊最新文献
The effect of cataract surgery on lowering intraocular pressure. Artificial intelligence in ophthalmology. A comprehensive update on over the counter artificial tears. Challenges and outcomes of cataract surgery after vitrectomy. Cataract surgery combined with glaucoma surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1