Rong Chai,Xinpei Jiang,Ruixia Ma,Qiang Zhang,E Yang,Ansheng Zhang
{"title":"治疗单颗牙齿根管内折断器械的不同策略:病例报告。","authors":"Rong Chai,Xinpei Jiang,Ruixia Ma,Qiang Zhang,E Yang,Ansheng Zhang","doi":"10.3892/etm.2024.12700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A fractured instrument (FI) in the root canal is a common complication during root canal therapy. Under current medical conditions, instrument separation cannot be completely avoided because of the complex morphology of root canals and the limited surgical field and operating space of the surgeon. FIs, especially those broken in the apical third of the canal, render it difficult to completely remove infection in the root canal, where the residual infection can easily develop into reinfection. The removal of FIs is therefore the preferred option for the majority of clinicians in such cases. However, root canal preparation instruments are frequently fractured during treatment because of the complex root canal morphology, such as curvature or severe calcification, which further increases the difficulty of instrument removal. In the present case, a 41-year-old female patient complained of worsening pain in the left maxillary first molar for 3 days. This patient had been treated at another hospital 2 years earlier, but the discomfort persisted after treatment. Preoperative periapical radiography revealed suspected FIs at the apical third of the mesiobuccal (MB) root and the middle third of the distal buccal (DB) root, underfilling of the palatal (P) root canal and large hypodense areas surrounding the periapical region of all roots. Next, the micro-ultrasound technique was used to remove the FI in the DB canal; a bypass through the second MB canal (MB2) was created to fill the apical stop of the MB root and the P canal was retreated. The therapeutic effect of the bypass technique was assessed by comparing bypass treatment and removal treatment for endodontic FIs. The 9-month and 27-month follow-ups revealed that the periapical inflammation surrounding the DB root treated after removal of the FI and the MB root treated by bypass was significantly controlled compared with that before the operation. In addition, the present report reviewed the research progress in bypass and removal techniques, focusing on the difficulties and key points of successful root canal therapy.","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Different strategies for treating intracanal fractured instruments in a single tooth: A case report.\",\"authors\":\"Rong Chai,Xinpei Jiang,Ruixia Ma,Qiang Zhang,E Yang,Ansheng Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.3892/etm.2024.12700\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A fractured instrument (FI) in the root canal is a common complication during root canal therapy. Under current medical conditions, instrument separation cannot be completely avoided because of the complex morphology of root canals and the limited surgical field and operating space of the surgeon. FIs, especially those broken in the apical third of the canal, render it difficult to completely remove infection in the root canal, where the residual infection can easily develop into reinfection. The removal of FIs is therefore the preferred option for the majority of clinicians in such cases. However, root canal preparation instruments are frequently fractured during treatment because of the complex root canal morphology, such as curvature or severe calcification, which further increases the difficulty of instrument removal. In the present case, a 41-year-old female patient complained of worsening pain in the left maxillary first molar for 3 days. This patient had been treated at another hospital 2 years earlier, but the discomfort persisted after treatment. Preoperative periapical radiography revealed suspected FIs at the apical third of the mesiobuccal (MB) root and the middle third of the distal buccal (DB) root, underfilling of the palatal (P) root canal and large hypodense areas surrounding the periapical region of all roots. Next, the micro-ultrasound technique was used to remove the FI in the DB canal; a bypass through the second MB canal (MB2) was created to fill the apical stop of the MB root and the P canal was retreated. The therapeutic effect of the bypass technique was assessed by comparing bypass treatment and removal treatment for endodontic FIs. The 9-month and 27-month follow-ups revealed that the periapical inflammation surrounding the DB root treated after removal of the FI and the MB root treated by bypass was significantly controlled compared with that before the operation. In addition, the present report reviewed the research progress in bypass and removal techniques, focusing on the difficulties and key points of successful root canal therapy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2024.12700\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2024.12700","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
根管内的器械断裂(FI)是根管治疗过程中常见的并发症。在目前的医疗条件下,由于根管形态复杂,外科医生的手术视野和操作空间有限,无法完全避免器械分离。FI,尤其是在根管顶端三分之一处折断的 FI,很难完全清除根管内的感染,残余感染很容易发展成再次感染。因此,在这种情况下,大多数临床医生都会选择去除 FI。然而,由于根管形态复杂,如弯曲或严重钙化,根管预备器械在治疗过程中经常发生折断,这进一步增加了器械取出的难度。在本病例中,一名 41 岁的女性患者主诉左上颌第一磨牙疼痛加重 3 天。该患者两年前曾在另一家医院接受过治疗,但治疗后不适症状依然存在。术前根尖周X光检查发现,中颊根(MB)根尖三分之一处和远颊根(DB)根中部三分之一处疑似有FI,腭根(P)根管充盈不足,所有根尖周周围都有大面积低密度区。接下来,利用微超声技术去除 DB 根管中的 FI;通过第二个 MB 根管(MB2)建立旁路以填充 MB 根管的顶端止点,并对 P 根管进行回缩。通过比较分流治疗和牙髓FI去除治疗,评估了分流技术的治疗效果。9 个月和 27 个月的随访结果显示,与手术前相比,切除 FI 后治疗的 DB 根和旁路治疗的 MB 根周围的根尖周炎得到了明显控制。此外,本报告还回顾了分流和拔除技术的研究进展,重点介绍了成功根管治疗的难点和关键点。
Different strategies for treating intracanal fractured instruments in a single tooth: A case report.
A fractured instrument (FI) in the root canal is a common complication during root canal therapy. Under current medical conditions, instrument separation cannot be completely avoided because of the complex morphology of root canals and the limited surgical field and operating space of the surgeon. FIs, especially those broken in the apical third of the canal, render it difficult to completely remove infection in the root canal, where the residual infection can easily develop into reinfection. The removal of FIs is therefore the preferred option for the majority of clinicians in such cases. However, root canal preparation instruments are frequently fractured during treatment because of the complex root canal morphology, such as curvature or severe calcification, which further increases the difficulty of instrument removal. In the present case, a 41-year-old female patient complained of worsening pain in the left maxillary first molar for 3 days. This patient had been treated at another hospital 2 years earlier, but the discomfort persisted after treatment. Preoperative periapical radiography revealed suspected FIs at the apical third of the mesiobuccal (MB) root and the middle third of the distal buccal (DB) root, underfilling of the palatal (P) root canal and large hypodense areas surrounding the periapical region of all roots. Next, the micro-ultrasound technique was used to remove the FI in the DB canal; a bypass through the second MB canal (MB2) was created to fill the apical stop of the MB root and the P canal was retreated. The therapeutic effect of the bypass technique was assessed by comparing bypass treatment and removal treatment for endodontic FIs. The 9-month and 27-month follow-ups revealed that the periapical inflammation surrounding the DB root treated after removal of the FI and the MB root treated by bypass was significantly controlled compared with that before the operation. In addition, the present report reviewed the research progress in bypass and removal techniques, focusing on the difficulties and key points of successful root canal therapy.