土工格栅和土工格室稳定基层土的变形模量现场评估

IF 1.9 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Pub Date : 2024-08-15 DOI:10.1007/s12205-024-2322-7
Sidhu Ramulu Duddu, Vamsi Kommanamanchi, Hariprasad Chennarapu, Umashankar Balunaini
{"title":"土工格栅和土工格室稳定基层土的变形模量现场评估","authors":"Sidhu Ramulu Duddu, Vamsi Kommanamanchi, Hariprasad Chennarapu, Umashankar Balunaini","doi":"10.1007/s12205-024-2322-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In-situ testing programs are conducted to evaluate the potential use of the light weight deflectometer (LWD) device for measuring the in-situ deformation modulus of subgrade soil layers stabilized with geosynthetic reinforcement. A series of in-situ field tests are carried out on six test sections that include 1) unstabilized subgrade soil and 2) geogrid- and geocell-reinforced stabilized subgrade soil. Field measurements on the modulus improvement factor (<i>MIF</i>) of stabilized subgrades provide more practical and realistic results. The <i>MIF</i> value depends on the type, geometry, location of geosynthetic reinforcements, and characteristics of subgrade soil. An accurate and quick evaluation of <i>MIF</i> can help in the timely design and execution of new road networks. The novelty of the study comprises of measuring the in-situ <i>MIF</i> of geosynthetic stabilized subgrade soil using a light weight deflectometer (LWD) device and comparing the results with the in-situ plate load test (PLT) and falling weight deflectometer (FWD) devices for the considered test configurations. The deformation modulus from LWD test demonstrated a similar trend to the modulus values obtained from PLT and FWD. The improved in-situ deformation modulus from three different tests (<i>E</i><sub><i>PLT</i></sub>, <i>E</i><sub><i>LWD</i></sub>, and <i>E</i><sub><i>FWD</i></sub>) are found to be 29.5 MPa, 34.5 MPa and 114.8 MPa for geocell; 21.1 MPa, 25.7 MPa and 86.2 MPa for biaxial geogrid; 37.2 MPa, 29.7 MPa and 89.5 MPa for triaxial geogrid, when the geosynthetic reinforcement is embedded at a depth of 100 mm. In addition, the <i>MIF</i> values of geosynthetic stabilized subgrade soil for the considered test sections are found to be in the range of 1.0 to 2.5.</p>","PeriodicalId":17897,"journal":{"name":"KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Field Evaluation of Deformation Modulus of Geogrid and Geocell-Stabilized Subgrade Soil\",\"authors\":\"Sidhu Ramulu Duddu, Vamsi Kommanamanchi, Hariprasad Chennarapu, Umashankar Balunaini\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12205-024-2322-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In-situ testing programs are conducted to evaluate the potential use of the light weight deflectometer (LWD) device for measuring the in-situ deformation modulus of subgrade soil layers stabilized with geosynthetic reinforcement. A series of in-situ field tests are carried out on six test sections that include 1) unstabilized subgrade soil and 2) geogrid- and geocell-reinforced stabilized subgrade soil. Field measurements on the modulus improvement factor (<i>MIF</i>) of stabilized subgrades provide more practical and realistic results. The <i>MIF</i> value depends on the type, geometry, location of geosynthetic reinforcements, and characteristics of subgrade soil. An accurate and quick evaluation of <i>MIF</i> can help in the timely design and execution of new road networks. The novelty of the study comprises of measuring the in-situ <i>MIF</i> of geosynthetic stabilized subgrade soil using a light weight deflectometer (LWD) device and comparing the results with the in-situ plate load test (PLT) and falling weight deflectometer (FWD) devices for the considered test configurations. The deformation modulus from LWD test demonstrated a similar trend to the modulus values obtained from PLT and FWD. The improved in-situ deformation modulus from three different tests (<i>E</i><sub><i>PLT</i></sub>, <i>E</i><sub><i>LWD</i></sub>, and <i>E</i><sub><i>FWD</i></sub>) are found to be 29.5 MPa, 34.5 MPa and 114.8 MPa for geocell; 21.1 MPa, 25.7 MPa and 86.2 MPa for biaxial geogrid; 37.2 MPa, 29.7 MPa and 89.5 MPa for triaxial geogrid, when the geosynthetic reinforcement is embedded at a depth of 100 mm. In addition, the <i>MIF</i> values of geosynthetic stabilized subgrade soil for the considered test sections are found to be in the range of 1.0 to 2.5.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17897,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-024-2322-7\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-024-2322-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为评估轻质偏转仪(LWD)装置在测量土工合成材料加固的路基土层的原位变形模量方面的潜在用途,开展了原位测试项目。对六个试验段进行了一系列现场原位测试,其中包括:1)未加固的路基土;2)土工格栅和土工格室加固的加固路基土。对稳定路基的模量改进系数(MIF)进行实地测量,可获得更实用、更真实的结果。MIF 值取决于土工合成材料加固层的类型、几何形状、位置以及基层土的特性。准确、快速地评估 MIF 值有助于及时设计和实施新的道路网络。本研究的新颖之处在于使用轻质偏转仪(LWD)装置测量土工合成材料加固路基土的原位 MIF,并将结果与所考虑的测试配置的原位板载测试(PLT)和坠重偏转仪(FWD)装置进行比较。LWD 试验得出的变形模量与 PLT 和 FWD 试验得出的模量值趋势相似。当土工合成材料加固层嵌入深度为 100 毫米时,三种不同试验(EPLT、ELWD 和 EFWD)得出的改进原位变形模量分别为:土工格室 29.5 兆帕、34.5 兆帕和 114.8 兆帕;双轴土工格栅 21.1 兆帕、25.7 兆帕和 86.2 兆帕;三轴土工格栅 37.2 兆帕、29.7 兆帕和 89.5 兆帕。此外,在所考虑的试验段中,土工合成材料加固路基土壤的 MIF 值在 1.0 至 2.5 之间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Field Evaluation of Deformation Modulus of Geogrid and Geocell-Stabilized Subgrade Soil

In-situ testing programs are conducted to evaluate the potential use of the light weight deflectometer (LWD) device for measuring the in-situ deformation modulus of subgrade soil layers stabilized with geosynthetic reinforcement. A series of in-situ field tests are carried out on six test sections that include 1) unstabilized subgrade soil and 2) geogrid- and geocell-reinforced stabilized subgrade soil. Field measurements on the modulus improvement factor (MIF) of stabilized subgrades provide more practical and realistic results. The MIF value depends on the type, geometry, location of geosynthetic reinforcements, and characteristics of subgrade soil. An accurate and quick evaluation of MIF can help in the timely design and execution of new road networks. The novelty of the study comprises of measuring the in-situ MIF of geosynthetic stabilized subgrade soil using a light weight deflectometer (LWD) device and comparing the results with the in-situ plate load test (PLT) and falling weight deflectometer (FWD) devices for the considered test configurations. The deformation modulus from LWD test demonstrated a similar trend to the modulus values obtained from PLT and FWD. The improved in-situ deformation modulus from three different tests (EPLT, ELWD, and EFWD) are found to be 29.5 MPa, 34.5 MPa and 114.8 MPa for geocell; 21.1 MPa, 25.7 MPa and 86.2 MPa for biaxial geogrid; 37.2 MPa, 29.7 MPa and 89.5 MPa for triaxial geogrid, when the geosynthetic reinforcement is embedded at a depth of 100 mm. In addition, the MIF values of geosynthetic stabilized subgrade soil for the considered test sections are found to be in the range of 1.0 to 2.5.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering ENGINEERING, CIVIL-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
329
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: The KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering is a technical bimonthly journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers. The journal reports original study results (both academic and practical) on past practices and present information in all civil engineering fields. The journal publishes original papers within the broad field of civil engineering, which includes, but are not limited to, the following: coastal and harbor engineering, construction management, environmental engineering, geotechnical engineering, highway engineering, hydraulic engineering, information technology, nuclear power engineering, railroad engineering, structural engineering, surveying and geo-spatial engineering, transportation engineering, tunnel engineering, and water resources and hydrologic engineering
期刊最新文献
A Novel Rockburst Tendency Index Based on LURR BIM and TLS Point Cloud Integration for Information Management of Underground Coal Mines: A Case Study in Nui Beo Underground Coal Mining in Vietnam Experimental Study on Anisotropic Deformation Behavior and Microstructure Evolution of Red-Bed Mudstone Analysis of the Active Earth Pressure of Sandy Soil under the Translational Failure Mode of Rigid Retaining Walls Near Slopes A Hybrid Numerical-ML Model for Predicting Geological Risks in Tunneling with Electrical Methods
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1