{"title":"评估合格电子签名的可用性:系统化使用案例和设计范例","authors":"Mustafa Cagal, Kemal Bicakci","doi":"arxiv-2408.14349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite being legally equivalent to handwritten signatures, Qualified\nElectronic Signatures (QES) have not yet achieved significant market success.\nQES offer substantial potential for reducing reliance on paper-based contracts,\nenabling secure digital applications, and standardizing public services.\nHowever, there is limited information on their usability despite the extensive\nrange of use cases. To address this gap, we systematize QES use cases and\ncategorize the system designs implemented to support these use cases,\nemphasizing the necessity to evaluate their respective strengths and weaknesses\nthrough usability studies. Additionally, we present findings from cognitive\nwalkthroughs conducted on use cases across four different QES systems. We\nanticipate that this work will serve as a foundation for a significant\nexpansion of research into the usability of Qualified Electronic Signatures.","PeriodicalId":501310,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Other Computer Science","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Usability of Qualified Electronic Signatures: Systematized Use Cases and Design Paradigms\",\"authors\":\"Mustafa Cagal, Kemal Bicakci\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2408.14349\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite being legally equivalent to handwritten signatures, Qualified\\nElectronic Signatures (QES) have not yet achieved significant market success.\\nQES offer substantial potential for reducing reliance on paper-based contracts,\\nenabling secure digital applications, and standardizing public services.\\nHowever, there is limited information on their usability despite the extensive\\nrange of use cases. To address this gap, we systematize QES use cases and\\ncategorize the system designs implemented to support these use cases,\\nemphasizing the necessity to evaluate their respective strengths and weaknesses\\nthrough usability studies. Additionally, we present findings from cognitive\\nwalkthroughs conducted on use cases across four different QES systems. We\\nanticipate that this work will serve as a foundation for a significant\\nexpansion of research into the usability of Qualified Electronic Signatures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501310,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - CS - Other Computer Science\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - CS - Other Computer Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.14349\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Other Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2408.14349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluating the Usability of Qualified Electronic Signatures: Systematized Use Cases and Design Paradigms
Despite being legally equivalent to handwritten signatures, Qualified
Electronic Signatures (QES) have not yet achieved significant market success.
QES offer substantial potential for reducing reliance on paper-based contracts,
enabling secure digital applications, and standardizing public services.
However, there is limited information on their usability despite the extensive
range of use cases. To address this gap, we systematize QES use cases and
categorize the system designs implemented to support these use cases,
emphasizing the necessity to evaluate their respective strengths and weaknesses
through usability studies. Additionally, we present findings from cognitive
walkthroughs conducted on use cases across four different QES systems. We
anticipate that this work will serve as a foundation for a significant
expansion of research into the usability of Qualified Electronic Signatures.