固体基质中全氟辛烷磺酸沥滤评估和预测方法综述

IF 6.4 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Current Pollution Reports Pub Date : 2024-08-20 DOI:10.1007/s40726-024-00326-6
Divina A. Navarro, Shervin S. Kabiri, Karl Bowles, Emma R. Knight, Jennifer Braeunig, Prashant Srivastava, Naomi J. Boxall, Grant Douglas, Jochen Mueller, Mike J. McLaughlin, Mike Williams, Rai S. Kookana
{"title":"固体基质中全氟辛烷磺酸沥滤评估和预测方法综述","authors":"Divina A. Navarro,&nbsp;Shervin S. Kabiri,&nbsp;Karl Bowles,&nbsp;Emma R. Knight,&nbsp;Jennifer Braeunig,&nbsp;Prashant Srivastava,&nbsp;Naomi J. Boxall,&nbsp;Grant Douglas,&nbsp;Jochen Mueller,&nbsp;Mike J. McLaughlin,&nbsp;Mike Williams,&nbsp;Rai S. Kookana","doi":"10.1007/s40726-024-00326-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose of Review</h3><p>Per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are prevalent environmental contaminants detected in materials such as soils, biosolids, and wastes. Understanding PFAS leaching is crucial for assessing risks associated with leaving impacted material in place, reuse, or disposal. However, there is limited guidance on laboratory methods to measure extent and rate of leaching. This review aims to identify the best methods for assessing PFAS leaching that are reflective of relevant release scenarios.</p><h3>Recent Findings</h3><p>Various methods have been applied to assess PFAS leaching from contaminated materials. The most common are batch leaching methods that simulate particular conditions (e.g. rainfall, landfill), with the intention of providing conservative estimates (worst-case scenarios) of cumulative PFAS release over time. Columns, static leaching, and rainfall simulators are also used to simulate less aggressive field-like conditions. While less common, pan and suction lysimeters have been used to measure PFAS leaching in situ. Most methods use saturated conditions that do not account for the possible influence of air–water interface accumulation and wetting–drying cycles on leaching. A notable gap is the scarcity of data benchmarking laboratory-leached concentrations with real-world PFAS concentrations. Establishing this relationship is crucial for reliable laboratory protocols.</p><h3>Summary</h3><p>This article reviews methods for estimating leaching of PFAS from contaminated materials. Given the variety of methods, selecting those that best simulate assessment objectives is essential. Specific scenarios requiring PFAS leaching assessment, such as leaving materials in place, reuse, and disposal, are discussed. The knowledge gaps presented could be used to improve existing leaching methods for better predictions and understanding of PFAS leachability.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3>\n<div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":528,"journal":{"name":"Current Pollution Reports","volume":"10 4","pages":"628 - 647"},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40726-024-00326-6.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Review on Methods for Assessing and Predicting Leaching of PFAS from Solid Matrices\",\"authors\":\"Divina A. Navarro,&nbsp;Shervin S. Kabiri,&nbsp;Karl Bowles,&nbsp;Emma R. Knight,&nbsp;Jennifer Braeunig,&nbsp;Prashant Srivastava,&nbsp;Naomi J. Boxall,&nbsp;Grant Douglas,&nbsp;Jochen Mueller,&nbsp;Mike J. McLaughlin,&nbsp;Mike Williams,&nbsp;Rai S. Kookana\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40726-024-00326-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose of Review</h3><p>Per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are prevalent environmental contaminants detected in materials such as soils, biosolids, and wastes. Understanding PFAS leaching is crucial for assessing risks associated with leaving impacted material in place, reuse, or disposal. However, there is limited guidance on laboratory methods to measure extent and rate of leaching. This review aims to identify the best methods for assessing PFAS leaching that are reflective of relevant release scenarios.</p><h3>Recent Findings</h3><p>Various methods have been applied to assess PFAS leaching from contaminated materials. The most common are batch leaching methods that simulate particular conditions (e.g. rainfall, landfill), with the intention of providing conservative estimates (worst-case scenarios) of cumulative PFAS release over time. Columns, static leaching, and rainfall simulators are also used to simulate less aggressive field-like conditions. While less common, pan and suction lysimeters have been used to measure PFAS leaching in situ. Most methods use saturated conditions that do not account for the possible influence of air–water interface accumulation and wetting–drying cycles on leaching. A notable gap is the scarcity of data benchmarking laboratory-leached concentrations with real-world PFAS concentrations. Establishing this relationship is crucial for reliable laboratory protocols.</p><h3>Summary</h3><p>This article reviews methods for estimating leaching of PFAS from contaminated materials. Given the variety of methods, selecting those that best simulate assessment objectives is essential. Specific scenarios requiring PFAS leaching assessment, such as leaving materials in place, reuse, and disposal, are discussed. The knowledge gaps presented could be used to improve existing leaching methods for better predictions and understanding of PFAS leachability.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3>\\n<div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":528,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Pollution Reports\",\"volume\":\"10 4\",\"pages\":\"628 - 647\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s40726-024-00326-6.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Pollution Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40726-024-00326-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Pollution Reports","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40726-024-00326-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

综述目的 全氟和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)是在土壤、生物固体和废物等材料中检测到的普遍环境污染物。了解 PFAS 浸出情况对于评估受影响材料留在原地、再利用或处置的相关风险至关重要。然而,实验室测量沥滤范围和速度的方法指导却很有限。本综述旨在确定评估 PFAS 浸出情况的最佳方法,以反映相关的释放情况。最常见的是模拟特定条件(如降雨、垃圾填埋场)的分批沥滤法,目的是对随着时间的推移而累积释放的 PFAS 进行保守估计(最坏情况假设)。柱式、静态浸出和降雨模拟器也用于模拟侵蚀性较低的类似现场的条件。盘式和吸式浸出器虽然不太常见,但也用于测量 PFAS 的原位浸出。大多数方法使用的都是饱和条件,没有考虑空气-水界面积聚和润湿-干燥循环对沥滤可能产生的影响。一个值得注意的缺陷是,缺乏将实验室沥滤浓度与现实世界中的 PFAS 浓度进行基准比较的数据。本文综述了估算受污染材料中 PFAS 浸出量的方法。鉴于方法多种多样,选择最能模拟评估目标的方法至关重要。文章讨论了需要进行 PFAS 沥滤评估的具体场景,如将材料留在原地、再利用和处置。提出的知识差距可用于改进现有的浸出方法,以更好地预测和了解 PFAS 的浸出性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Review on Methods for Assessing and Predicting Leaching of PFAS from Solid Matrices

Purpose of Review

Per- and poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are prevalent environmental contaminants detected in materials such as soils, biosolids, and wastes. Understanding PFAS leaching is crucial for assessing risks associated with leaving impacted material in place, reuse, or disposal. However, there is limited guidance on laboratory methods to measure extent and rate of leaching. This review aims to identify the best methods for assessing PFAS leaching that are reflective of relevant release scenarios.

Recent Findings

Various methods have been applied to assess PFAS leaching from contaminated materials. The most common are batch leaching methods that simulate particular conditions (e.g. rainfall, landfill), with the intention of providing conservative estimates (worst-case scenarios) of cumulative PFAS release over time. Columns, static leaching, and rainfall simulators are also used to simulate less aggressive field-like conditions. While less common, pan and suction lysimeters have been used to measure PFAS leaching in situ. Most methods use saturated conditions that do not account for the possible influence of air–water interface accumulation and wetting–drying cycles on leaching. A notable gap is the scarcity of data benchmarking laboratory-leached concentrations with real-world PFAS concentrations. Establishing this relationship is crucial for reliable laboratory protocols.

Summary

This article reviews methods for estimating leaching of PFAS from contaminated materials. Given the variety of methods, selecting those that best simulate assessment objectives is essential. Specific scenarios requiring PFAS leaching assessment, such as leaving materials in place, reuse, and disposal, are discussed. The knowledge gaps presented could be used to improve existing leaching methods for better predictions and understanding of PFAS leachability.

Graphical Abstract

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Current Pollution Reports
Current Pollution Reports Environmental Science-Water Science and Technology
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
1.40%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Current Pollution Reports provides in-depth review articles contributed by international experts on the most significant developments in the field of environmental pollution.By presenting clear, insightful, balanced reviews that emphasize recently published papers of major importance, the journal elucidates current and emerging approaches to identification, characterization, treatment, management of pollutants and much more.
期刊最新文献
Copper Oxide Nanoparticles as an Emergent Threat to Aquatic Invertebrates and Photosynthetic Organisms: A Synthesis of the Known and Exploration of the Unknown A Mini Review on Biologically Innovative Solution for Biodegradation of Plastics/Microplastics by the Use of Superworms Recent Advances and Prospective Challenges of Iron Metal–Organic Framework (MOF) Catalysts in Electrochemical Fenton Treatment Technologies Antibiotic Removal Based on Constructed Wetland: Mechanism, Performance, and Regulation Chemical Concentrations, Source Emission, Potential Toxicity, and Health Risk of Ambient Fine Particulate Matter and Its Constituents: A Recent Literature Review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1