久坐行为和体育活动对年轻成年人睡眠质量影响的时空替代分析:一项多中心研究

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH BMC Public Health Pub Date : 2024-09-10 DOI:10.1186/s12889-024-19995-5
Luiz Antônio Alves de Menezes-Júnior, Bruna Carolina Rafael Barbosa, Waléria de Paula, Aline Dayrell Ferreira, Clareci Silva Cardoso, Eulilian Dias de Freitas, Fernanda de Carvalho Vidigal, Livia Garcia Ferreira, Luciana Neri Nobre, Luciana Saraiva da Silva, Adriana Lúcia Meireles
{"title":"久坐行为和体育活动对年轻成年人睡眠质量影响的时空替代分析:一项多中心研究","authors":"Luiz Antônio Alves de Menezes-Júnior, Bruna Carolina Rafael Barbosa, Waléria de Paula, Aline Dayrell Ferreira, Clareci Silva Cardoso, Eulilian Dias de Freitas, Fernanda de Carvalho Vidigal, Livia Garcia Ferreira, Luciana Neri Nobre, Luciana Saraiva da Silva, Adriana Lúcia Meireles","doi":"10.1186/s12889-024-19995-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To evaluate the effects of replacing time spent in sedentary behavior (SB) with moderate to vigorous physical activity on sleep quality in young adults. Multicenter cross-sectional study, carried out with students enrolled in undergraduate courses at universities in Brazil. Sleep quality was assessed using a question of the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-brief) and classified as good or poor sleep quality. SB was evaluated by self-reported total sitting time, and the level of leisure-time PA was classified according to the intensity of moderate-intensity physical activity (MPA) and vigorous-intensity physical activity (VPA), which were assessed using a self-reported questionnaire. An isotemporal replacement logistic model was used to evaluate the effects of different SB, MPA, and VPA sessions on sleep quality. A total of 8,059 study participants were evaluated, the majority had poor sleep quality (64.79%), were physically inactive (48.28%, defined as practicing < 150 min of MPA or < 75 min of VPA per week), and spent ≥ 9 h/day in SB (55.08%). The multivariate model showed an association between non-adherence to wake-based movement guidelines and poor sleep quality, where those with one altered behavior were 43% more likely to have poor sleep quality (OR:1.43;95%CI:1.27 to 1.60), while individuals with two altered behaviors were 97% more likely (OR:1.97;95%CI:1.73 to 2.24). In the isotemporal analysis, replacing MPA and VPA with equivalent time in SB increased the odds of poor sleep at all times assessed, with peaks of 56% for MPA and 68% for VPA. The results of the present study indicate that replacing SB with the same amount of MPA or VPA may reduce poor sleep quality.","PeriodicalId":9039,"journal":{"name":"BMC Public Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Isotemporal substitution analysis of time between sedentary behavior, and physical activity on sleep quality in younger adults: a multicenter study\",\"authors\":\"Luiz Antônio Alves de Menezes-Júnior, Bruna Carolina Rafael Barbosa, Waléria de Paula, Aline Dayrell Ferreira, Clareci Silva Cardoso, Eulilian Dias de Freitas, Fernanda de Carvalho Vidigal, Livia Garcia Ferreira, Luciana Neri Nobre, Luciana Saraiva da Silva, Adriana Lúcia Meireles\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12889-024-19995-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To evaluate the effects of replacing time spent in sedentary behavior (SB) with moderate to vigorous physical activity on sleep quality in young adults. Multicenter cross-sectional study, carried out with students enrolled in undergraduate courses at universities in Brazil. Sleep quality was assessed using a question of the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-brief) and classified as good or poor sleep quality. SB was evaluated by self-reported total sitting time, and the level of leisure-time PA was classified according to the intensity of moderate-intensity physical activity (MPA) and vigorous-intensity physical activity (VPA), which were assessed using a self-reported questionnaire. An isotemporal replacement logistic model was used to evaluate the effects of different SB, MPA, and VPA sessions on sleep quality. A total of 8,059 study participants were evaluated, the majority had poor sleep quality (64.79%), were physically inactive (48.28%, defined as practicing < 150 min of MPA or < 75 min of VPA per week), and spent ≥ 9 h/day in SB (55.08%). The multivariate model showed an association between non-adherence to wake-based movement guidelines and poor sleep quality, where those with one altered behavior were 43% more likely to have poor sleep quality (OR:1.43;95%CI:1.27 to 1.60), while individuals with two altered behaviors were 97% more likely (OR:1.97;95%CI:1.73 to 2.24). In the isotemporal analysis, replacing MPA and VPA with equivalent time in SB increased the odds of poor sleep at all times assessed, with peaks of 56% for MPA and 68% for VPA. The results of the present study indicate that replacing SB with the same amount of MPA or VPA may reduce poor sleep quality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9039,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Public Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-19995-5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-19995-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估以适度至剧烈运动取代久坐不动(SB)对年轻人睡眠质量的影响。这项多中心横断面研究的对象是巴西各所大学的本科生。睡眠质量通过世界卫生组织生活质量调查(WHOQOL-brief)的一个问题进行评估,并分为睡眠质量好和睡眠质量差。SB通过自我报告的总坐姿时间进行评估,闲暇时间体育锻炼水平则根据中等强度体育锻炼(MPA)和剧烈强度体育锻炼(VPA)的强度进行分类,并通过自我报告的问卷进行评估。采用等时替代逻辑模型来评估不同的SB、MPA和VPA对睡眠质量的影响。共对 8059 名研究参与者进行了评估,其中大多数人睡眠质量较差(64.79%)、缺乏运动(48.28%,定义为每周运动时间小于 150 分钟的 MPA 或小于 75 分钟的 VPA)、每天进行 SB 的时间≥ 9 小时(55.08%)。多变量模型显示,不遵守唤醒运动指南与睡眠质量差之间存在关联,有一种改变行为的人睡眠质量差的可能性增加了43%(OR:1.43;95%CI:1.27 to 1.60),而有两种改变行为的人睡眠质量差的可能性增加了97%(OR:1.97;95%CI:1.73 to 2.24)。在等时分析中,如果将 MPA 和 VPA 替换为在 SB 中的同等时间,则在所有评估时间内睡眠不佳的几率都会增加,其中 MPA 和 VPA 的峰值分别为 56% 和 68%。本研究的结果表明,用等量的 MPA 或 VPA 取代 SB 可降低睡眠质量差的几率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Isotemporal substitution analysis of time between sedentary behavior, and physical activity on sleep quality in younger adults: a multicenter study
To evaluate the effects of replacing time spent in sedentary behavior (SB) with moderate to vigorous physical activity on sleep quality in young adults. Multicenter cross-sectional study, carried out with students enrolled in undergraduate courses at universities in Brazil. Sleep quality was assessed using a question of the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-brief) and classified as good or poor sleep quality. SB was evaluated by self-reported total sitting time, and the level of leisure-time PA was classified according to the intensity of moderate-intensity physical activity (MPA) and vigorous-intensity physical activity (VPA), which were assessed using a self-reported questionnaire. An isotemporal replacement logistic model was used to evaluate the effects of different SB, MPA, and VPA sessions on sleep quality. A total of 8,059 study participants were evaluated, the majority had poor sleep quality (64.79%), were physically inactive (48.28%, defined as practicing < 150 min of MPA or < 75 min of VPA per week), and spent ≥ 9 h/day in SB (55.08%). The multivariate model showed an association between non-adherence to wake-based movement guidelines and poor sleep quality, where those with one altered behavior were 43% more likely to have poor sleep quality (OR:1.43;95%CI:1.27 to 1.60), while individuals with two altered behaviors were 97% more likely (OR:1.97;95%CI:1.73 to 2.24). In the isotemporal analysis, replacing MPA and VPA with equivalent time in SB increased the odds of poor sleep at all times assessed, with peaks of 56% for MPA and 68% for VPA. The results of the present study indicate that replacing SB with the same amount of MPA or VPA may reduce poor sleep quality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Public Health
BMC Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
4.40%
发文量
2108
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Public Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on the epidemiology of disease and the understanding of all aspects of public health. The journal has a special focus on the social determinants of health, the environmental, behavioral, and occupational correlates of health and disease, and the impact of health policies, practices and interventions on the community.
期刊最新文献
Association between total body muscle-fat ratio and risk of thyroid disorders: a cross-sectional study The association between mental status, personality traits, and discrepancy in social isolation and perceived loneliness among community dwellers Prevalence of undiagnosed hypertension and associated factors in Ndera sector, Gasabo district of Rwanda: a cross-sectional study Housing instability patterns among low-income, urban Black young adults in California and associations with mental health outcomes: baseline data from a randomized waitlist-controlled trial Level of hesitation of parents about childhood vaccines and affecting factors: a cross-sectional study in Turkey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1