网络结构的稳健性和脆弱性

Alice C. Schwarze, Jessica Jiang, Jonny Wray, Mason A. Porter
{"title":"网络结构的稳健性和脆弱性","authors":"Alice C. Schwarze, Jessica Jiang, Jonny Wray, Mason A. Porter","doi":"arxiv-2409.07498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Networks are useful descriptions of the structure of many complex systems.\nUnsurprisingly, it is thus important to analyze the robustness of networks in\nmany scientific disciplines. In applications in communication, logistics,\nfinance, ecology, biomedicine, and many other fields, researchers have studied\nthe robustness of networks to the removal of nodes, edges, or other subnetworks\nto identify and characterize robust network structures. A major challenge in\nthe study of network robustness is that researchers have reported that\ndifferent and seemingly contradictory network properties are correlated with a\nnetwork's robustness. Using a framework by Alderson and\nDoyle~\\cite{Alderson2010}, we categorize several notions of network robustness\nand we examine these ostensible contradictions. We survey studies of network\nrobustness with a focus on (1)~identifying robustness specifications in common\nuse, (2)~understanding when these specifications are appropriate, and\n(3)~understanding the conditions under which one can expect different notions\nof robustness to yield similar results. With this review, we aim to give\nresearchers an overview of the large, interdisciplinary body of work on network\nrobustness and develop practical guidance for the design of computational\nexperiments to study a network's robustness.","PeriodicalId":501043,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Physics and Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Structural Robustness and Vulnerability of Networks\",\"authors\":\"Alice C. Schwarze, Jessica Jiang, Jonny Wray, Mason A. Porter\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.07498\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Networks are useful descriptions of the structure of many complex systems.\\nUnsurprisingly, it is thus important to analyze the robustness of networks in\\nmany scientific disciplines. In applications in communication, logistics,\\nfinance, ecology, biomedicine, and many other fields, researchers have studied\\nthe robustness of networks to the removal of nodes, edges, or other subnetworks\\nto identify and characterize robust network structures. A major challenge in\\nthe study of network robustness is that researchers have reported that\\ndifferent and seemingly contradictory network properties are correlated with a\\nnetwork's robustness. Using a framework by Alderson and\\nDoyle~\\\\cite{Alderson2010}, we categorize several notions of network robustness\\nand we examine these ostensible contradictions. We survey studies of network\\nrobustness with a focus on (1)~identifying robustness specifications in common\\nuse, (2)~understanding when these specifications are appropriate, and\\n(3)~understanding the conditions under which one can expect different notions\\nof robustness to yield similar results. With this review, we aim to give\\nresearchers an overview of the large, interdisciplinary body of work on network\\nrobustness and develop practical guidance for the design of computational\\nexperiments to study a network's robustness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501043,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - PHYS - Physics and Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - PHYS - Physics and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.07498\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Physics and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.07498","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

网络是对许多复杂系统结构的有用描述。因此,分析网络的鲁棒性在许多科学学科中都非常重要。在通信、物流、金融、生态学、生物医学和许多其他领域的应用中,研究人员研究了网络对节点、边或其他子网络移除的鲁棒性,以识别和描述鲁棒网络结构。网络鲁棒性研究面临的一大挑战是,研究人员发现不同的、看似矛盾的网络属性与网络的鲁棒性存在关联。利用 Alderson 和 Doyle 的框架,我们对网络鲁棒性的几个概念进行了分类,并对这些表面上的矛盾进行了研究。我们对网络鲁棒性的研究进行了调查,重点是:(1)~识别常用的鲁棒性规范;(2)~理解这些规范何时合适;(3)~理解在哪些条件下,人们可以期望不同的鲁棒性概念产生相似的结果。通过这篇综述,我们旨在为研究人员提供有关网络鲁棒性的大量跨学科工作的概览,并为设计计算实验来研究网络的鲁棒性提供实用指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Structural Robustness and Vulnerability of Networks
Networks are useful descriptions of the structure of many complex systems. Unsurprisingly, it is thus important to analyze the robustness of networks in many scientific disciplines. In applications in communication, logistics, finance, ecology, biomedicine, and many other fields, researchers have studied the robustness of networks to the removal of nodes, edges, or other subnetworks to identify and characterize robust network structures. A major challenge in the study of network robustness is that researchers have reported that different and seemingly contradictory network properties are correlated with a network's robustness. Using a framework by Alderson and Doyle~\cite{Alderson2010}, we categorize several notions of network robustness and we examine these ostensible contradictions. We survey studies of network robustness with a focus on (1)~identifying robustness specifications in common use, (2)~understanding when these specifications are appropriate, and (3)~understanding the conditions under which one can expect different notions of robustness to yield similar results. With this review, we aim to give researchers an overview of the large, interdisciplinary body of work on network robustness and develop practical guidance for the design of computational experiments to study a network's robustness.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Continuity equation and fundamental diagram of pedestrians Anomalous behavior of Replicator dynamics for the Prisoner's Dilemma on diluted lattices Quantifying the role of supernatural entities and the effect of missing data in Irish sagas Crossing the disciplines -- a starter toolkit for researchers who wish to explore early Irish literature Female representation across mythologies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1