{"title":"再治疗时间重要吗?预测复发性脑转移瘤重复SRS后放射性坏死的NTCP模型纳入了随时间变化的折算剂量","authors":"Manju Sharma, Issam El Naqa, Penny K Sneed","doi":"arxiv-2409.07647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: To develop and compare normal tissue complication probability (NTCP)\nmodels for recurrent brain metastases (BMs) treated with repeat single-fraction\nstereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), considering time-dependent discounted prior\ndose. Methods: We developed three NTCP models of BMs treated with\nGammaKnife-based SRS. The maximum dose to 0.2cc (D0.2cc) of each\nlesion-specific brain and one-year radionecrosis was fitted using a logistic\nmodel with equivalent-dose conversions in 2 Gy (EQD2). The M0 and M1-retreat\nmodeled radionecrosis risk following SRS to 1029 non-recurrent lesions\n(patients=262) and 2nd SRS to 149 recurrent lesions (patients=87). The M1-combo\nmodel accounted for 2nd SRS and time-dependent discounted 1st SRS dose for\nrecurrent lesions estimated by a modified Gompertzian function. Results: All\nthree models fitted the data well (Chi-2 = 0.039-0.089 and p = 0.999-1.000).\nThe fitted EQD250 was ~103 Gy for M0, ~88 Gy for M1-retreat, and ~165 Gy for\nM1-combo. The fitted EQD2_50 exhibited a progressively flatter dose-response\ncurve across the three models, with values of 1.2 Gy for M0, 0.6 Gy for\nM1-retreat, and 0.4 Gy for M1-combo. For the brain D0.2cc of 29Gy and 19Gy, the\nsteepest to shallowest dose-response or largest change in NTCP, i.e., NTCP29Gy\n- NTCP19Gy was observed in M1-retreat (0.16), M0 (0.14) and M1-combo (0.06).\nConclusions: The model-fitted parameters predict that recurrent BMs have a\nlower threshold dose tolerance and a more gradual dose response for the 2nd SRS\nthan non-recurrent BMs. This gradual dose-response becomes even more apparent\nwhen considering the time-dependent discounted 1st SRS as a cumulative 2nd SRS.\nTailoring SRS retreatment protocols based on NTCP modeling can potentially\nenhance therapeutic efficacy.","PeriodicalId":501378,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Medical Physics","volume":"63 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does time to retreatment matter? An NTCP model to predict radionecrosis after repeat SRS for recurrent brain metastases incorporating time-dependent discounted dose\",\"authors\":\"Manju Sharma, Issam El Naqa, Penny K Sneed\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.07647\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: To develop and compare normal tissue complication probability (NTCP)\\nmodels for recurrent brain metastases (BMs) treated with repeat single-fraction\\nstereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), considering time-dependent discounted prior\\ndose. Methods: We developed three NTCP models of BMs treated with\\nGammaKnife-based SRS. The maximum dose to 0.2cc (D0.2cc) of each\\nlesion-specific brain and one-year radionecrosis was fitted using a logistic\\nmodel with equivalent-dose conversions in 2 Gy (EQD2). The M0 and M1-retreat\\nmodeled radionecrosis risk following SRS to 1029 non-recurrent lesions\\n(patients=262) and 2nd SRS to 149 recurrent lesions (patients=87). The M1-combo\\nmodel accounted for 2nd SRS and time-dependent discounted 1st SRS dose for\\nrecurrent lesions estimated by a modified Gompertzian function. Results: All\\nthree models fitted the data well (Chi-2 = 0.039-0.089 and p = 0.999-1.000).\\nThe fitted EQD250 was ~103 Gy for M0, ~88 Gy for M1-retreat, and ~165 Gy for\\nM1-combo. The fitted EQD2_50 exhibited a progressively flatter dose-response\\ncurve across the three models, with values of 1.2 Gy for M0, 0.6 Gy for\\nM1-retreat, and 0.4 Gy for M1-combo. For the brain D0.2cc of 29Gy and 19Gy, the\\nsteepest to shallowest dose-response or largest change in NTCP, i.e., NTCP29Gy\\n- NTCP19Gy was observed in M1-retreat (0.16), M0 (0.14) and M1-combo (0.06).\\nConclusions: The model-fitted parameters predict that recurrent BMs have a\\nlower threshold dose tolerance and a more gradual dose response for the 2nd SRS\\nthan non-recurrent BMs. This gradual dose-response becomes even more apparent\\nwhen considering the time-dependent discounted 1st SRS as a cumulative 2nd SRS.\\nTailoring SRS retreatment protocols based on NTCP modeling can potentially\\nenhance therapeutic efficacy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - PHYS - Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - PHYS - Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.07647\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.07647","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Does time to retreatment matter? An NTCP model to predict radionecrosis after repeat SRS for recurrent brain metastases incorporating time-dependent discounted dose
Purpose: To develop and compare normal tissue complication probability (NTCP)
models for recurrent brain metastases (BMs) treated with repeat single-fraction
stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), considering time-dependent discounted prior
dose. Methods: We developed three NTCP models of BMs treated with
GammaKnife-based SRS. The maximum dose to 0.2cc (D0.2cc) of each
lesion-specific brain and one-year radionecrosis was fitted using a logistic
model with equivalent-dose conversions in 2 Gy (EQD2). The M0 and M1-retreat
modeled radionecrosis risk following SRS to 1029 non-recurrent lesions
(patients=262) and 2nd SRS to 149 recurrent lesions (patients=87). The M1-combo
model accounted for 2nd SRS and time-dependent discounted 1st SRS dose for
recurrent lesions estimated by a modified Gompertzian function. Results: All
three models fitted the data well (Chi-2 = 0.039-0.089 and p = 0.999-1.000).
The fitted EQD250 was ~103 Gy for M0, ~88 Gy for M1-retreat, and ~165 Gy for
M1-combo. The fitted EQD2_50 exhibited a progressively flatter dose-response
curve across the three models, with values of 1.2 Gy for M0, 0.6 Gy for
M1-retreat, and 0.4 Gy for M1-combo. For the brain D0.2cc of 29Gy and 19Gy, the
steepest to shallowest dose-response or largest change in NTCP, i.e., NTCP29Gy
- NTCP19Gy was observed in M1-retreat (0.16), M0 (0.14) and M1-combo (0.06).
Conclusions: The model-fitted parameters predict that recurrent BMs have a
lower threshold dose tolerance and a more gradual dose response for the 2nd SRS
than non-recurrent BMs. This gradual dose-response becomes even more apparent
when considering the time-dependent discounted 1st SRS as a cumulative 2nd SRS.
Tailoring SRS retreatment protocols based on NTCP modeling can potentially
enhance therapeutic efficacy.