Linda M. Saikali , Christopher D. Herrera , Angela T. Chen , Gina Lepore , Omar I. Ramadan , Doreen Lam , Aaron Anandarajah , Carrie Z. Morales , Matthew Goldshore , Jon B. Morris , Carmen E. Guerra
{"title":"评估为资源不足的患者提供手术导航计划的患者体验","authors":"Linda M. Saikali , Christopher D. Herrera , Angela T. Chen , Gina Lepore , Omar I. Ramadan , Doreen Lam , Aaron Anandarajah , Carrie Z. Morales , Matthew Goldshore , Jon B. Morris , Carmen E. Guerra","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115955","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>This study aimed to characterize patient satisfaction with navigators and surgical care accessed through a novel navigation program for under-resourced communities.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>PSN-I and PSQ-18 questionnaires assessed satisfaction with navigators and care, respectively. Primary outcomes were PSN-I and PSQ-18 scores. Secondary analyses tested associations between satisfaction and patient factors and between PSN-I and PSQ-18 scores.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 294 patients contacted, 88 (29.9 %) responded. Most were Hispanic/Latinx (76.1 %), Spanish-speaking (71.5 %), and uninsured (85.2 %). Participants were highly satisfied with navigators (mean 38.5, SD 7.6; max. 45) and most care domains except Financial Aspects (mean 3.2, SD 1.0; max. 5) and Accessibility/Convenience (mean 3.5, SD 0.6; max. 5). Higher navigator satisfaction was associated with post-consultation need for surgery (coeff. 5.6, 95 % CI[0.9, 10.3]) and increased the odds of care satisfaction (OR 1.1, 95 % CI[1.0, 1.2]).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Patients are satisfied with navigation services—a previously unstudied aspect of this unique surgical equity program.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7771,"journal":{"name":"American journal of surgery","volume":"238 ","pages":"Article 115955"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating patient experience with a surgical navigation program for under-resourced patients\",\"authors\":\"Linda M. Saikali , Christopher D. Herrera , Angela T. Chen , Gina Lepore , Omar I. Ramadan , Doreen Lam , Aaron Anandarajah , Carrie Z. Morales , Matthew Goldshore , Jon B. Morris , Carmen E. Guerra\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115955\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>This study aimed to characterize patient satisfaction with navigators and surgical care accessed through a novel navigation program for under-resourced communities.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>PSN-I and PSQ-18 questionnaires assessed satisfaction with navigators and care, respectively. Primary outcomes were PSN-I and PSQ-18 scores. Secondary analyses tested associations between satisfaction and patient factors and between PSN-I and PSQ-18 scores.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 294 patients contacted, 88 (29.9 %) responded. Most were Hispanic/Latinx (76.1 %), Spanish-speaking (71.5 %), and uninsured (85.2 %). Participants were highly satisfied with navigators (mean 38.5, SD 7.6; max. 45) and most care domains except Financial Aspects (mean 3.2, SD 1.0; max. 5) and Accessibility/Convenience (mean 3.5, SD 0.6; max. 5). Higher navigator satisfaction was associated with post-consultation need for surgery (coeff. 5.6, 95 % CI[0.9, 10.3]) and increased the odds of care satisfaction (OR 1.1, 95 % CI[1.0, 1.2]).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Patients are satisfied with navigation services—a previously unstudied aspect of this unique surgical equity program.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7771,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of surgery\",\"volume\":\"238 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115955\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002961024005075\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002961024005075","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluating patient experience with a surgical navigation program for under-resourced patients
Background
This study aimed to characterize patient satisfaction with navigators and surgical care accessed through a novel navigation program for under-resourced communities.
Methods
PSN-I and PSQ-18 questionnaires assessed satisfaction with navigators and care, respectively. Primary outcomes were PSN-I and PSQ-18 scores. Secondary analyses tested associations between satisfaction and patient factors and between PSN-I and PSQ-18 scores.
Results
Of 294 patients contacted, 88 (29.9 %) responded. Most were Hispanic/Latinx (76.1 %), Spanish-speaking (71.5 %), and uninsured (85.2 %). Participants were highly satisfied with navigators (mean 38.5, SD 7.6; max. 45) and most care domains except Financial Aspects (mean 3.2, SD 1.0; max. 5) and Accessibility/Convenience (mean 3.5, SD 0.6; max. 5). Higher navigator satisfaction was associated with post-consultation need for surgery (coeff. 5.6, 95 % CI[0.9, 10.3]) and increased the odds of care satisfaction (OR 1.1, 95 % CI[1.0, 1.2]).
Conclusions
Patients are satisfied with navigation services—a previously unstudied aspect of this unique surgical equity program.
期刊介绍：
The American Journal of Surgery® is a peer-reviewed journal designed for the general surgeon who performs abdominal, cancer, vascular, head and neck, breast, colorectal, and other forms of surgery. AJS is the official journal of 7 major surgical societies* and publishes their official papers as well as independently submitted clinical studies, editorials, reviews, brief reports, correspondence and book reviews.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
