应用机器学习方法从火山岛高密度临时观测地震记录中探测地震

IF 2.2 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Applied Geophysics Pub Date : 2024-09-07 DOI:10.1016/j.jappgeo.2024.105503
Hiroyuki Azuma , Hikaru Kunimasa , Adrianto Widi Kusumo , Yoshiya Oda , Toshiki Watanabe , Toshifumi Matsuoka
{"title":"应用机器学习方法从火山岛高密度临时观测地震记录中探测地震","authors":"Hiroyuki Azuma ,&nbsp;Hikaru Kunimasa ,&nbsp;Adrianto Widi Kusumo ,&nbsp;Yoshiya Oda ,&nbsp;Toshiki Watanabe ,&nbsp;Toshifumi Matsuoka","doi":"10.1016/j.jappgeo.2024.105503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We applied two machine learning models to detect earthquakes from records observed with seismometers temporarily installed on a volcanic island. The two models are based on different principles: one regards seismic waveforms as images, using a convolutional neural network (CNN) to determine the first arrival times of P-waves, S-waves. The other model regards seismic waveforms as series data. The model processes seismic waveforms as data in a specific order of noise, P-wave, and S-wave, similar to natural language.</p><p>The purpose of this study is to present the results of using machine learning first arrival times identification models with two principles for noisy seismic waveforms, caused by sea waves and strong winds in volcanic islands, and to evaluate the effectiveness of machine learning models for noisy observation records.</p><p>We created a Confusion Matrix using first arrival times determined by an expert and evaluated the detection performance of these two models using some metrics of the matrix. Additionally, we assessed accuracy of the model-identified first arrival times by generating a frequency distribution of the difference from the expert's detecting time.</p><p>The study discovered that the model treating data as series had superior detection ability for noisy data compared to the one treating data as images and the accuracy of the first arrival time detection was also better for the series data model too.</p><p>We compared the results obtained on this island with those obtained at the permanent station, which is considered to have less noise interference, described in <span><span>Mousavi et al., 2020</span></span>. It was found that the difference in detection ability between the two models is slight for data obtained at permanent stations with low noise interference, but that the difference in detection ability between the algorithms of the two models is significant in noisy environments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54882,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Geophysics","volume":"230 ","pages":"Article 105503"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of machine learning methods for earthquake detection from high-density temporary observation seismic records on a volcanic island\",\"authors\":\"Hiroyuki Azuma ,&nbsp;Hikaru Kunimasa ,&nbsp;Adrianto Widi Kusumo ,&nbsp;Yoshiya Oda ,&nbsp;Toshiki Watanabe ,&nbsp;Toshifumi Matsuoka\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jappgeo.2024.105503\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We applied two machine learning models to detect earthquakes from records observed with seismometers temporarily installed on a volcanic island. The two models are based on different principles: one regards seismic waveforms as images, using a convolutional neural network (CNN) to determine the first arrival times of P-waves, S-waves. The other model regards seismic waveforms as series data. The model processes seismic waveforms as data in a specific order of noise, P-wave, and S-wave, similar to natural language.</p><p>The purpose of this study is to present the results of using machine learning first arrival times identification models with two principles for noisy seismic waveforms, caused by sea waves and strong winds in volcanic islands, and to evaluate the effectiveness of machine learning models for noisy observation records.</p><p>We created a Confusion Matrix using first arrival times determined by an expert and evaluated the detection performance of these two models using some metrics of the matrix. Additionally, we assessed accuracy of the model-identified first arrival times by generating a frequency distribution of the difference from the expert's detecting time.</p><p>The study discovered that the model treating data as series had superior detection ability for noisy data compared to the one treating data as images and the accuracy of the first arrival time detection was also better for the series data model too.</p><p>We compared the results obtained on this island with those obtained at the permanent station, which is considered to have less noise interference, described in <span><span>Mousavi et al., 2020</span></span>. It was found that the difference in detection ability between the two models is slight for data obtained at permanent stations with low noise interference, but that the difference in detection ability between the algorithms of the two models is significant in noisy environments.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54882,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Geophysics\",\"volume\":\"230 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105503\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Geophysics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0926985124002192\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Geophysics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0926985124002192","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们应用两种机器学习模型,从临时安装在火山岛上的地震仪观测到的记录中检测地震。这两个模型基于不同的原理:一个模型将地震波形视为图像,使用卷积神经网络(CNN)确定 P 波和 S 波的首次到达时间。另一个模型将地震波形视为序列数据。该模型将地震波形作为数据,按照噪声、P 波和 S 波的特定顺序进行处理,类似于自然语言。本研究的目的是介绍针对由火山岛上的海浪和强风引起的噪声地震波形,采用两种原理的机器学习初至时间识别模型的结果,并评估机器学习模型对噪声观测记录的有效性。我们利用专家确定的初至时间创建了一个混淆矩阵,并利用矩阵的一些指标评估了这两个模型的检测性能。研究发现,与将数据视为图像的模型相比,将数据视为序列的模型对噪声数据的检测能力更强,而且序列数据模型的首次到达时间检测精度也更高。我们将在该岛上获得的结果与在永久站获得的结果进行了比较,后者被认为噪声干扰较小,见 Mousavi 等人,2020 年。结果发现,对于在噪声干扰较小的永久站点获得的数据,两种模型的检测能力差别很小,但在噪声环境中,两种模型算法的检测能力差别很大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Application of machine learning methods for earthquake detection from high-density temporary observation seismic records on a volcanic island

We applied two machine learning models to detect earthquakes from records observed with seismometers temporarily installed on a volcanic island. The two models are based on different principles: one regards seismic waveforms as images, using a convolutional neural network (CNN) to determine the first arrival times of P-waves, S-waves. The other model regards seismic waveforms as series data. The model processes seismic waveforms as data in a specific order of noise, P-wave, and S-wave, similar to natural language.

The purpose of this study is to present the results of using machine learning first arrival times identification models with two principles for noisy seismic waveforms, caused by sea waves and strong winds in volcanic islands, and to evaluate the effectiveness of machine learning models for noisy observation records.

We created a Confusion Matrix using first arrival times determined by an expert and evaluated the detection performance of these two models using some metrics of the matrix. Additionally, we assessed accuracy of the model-identified first arrival times by generating a frequency distribution of the difference from the expert's detecting time.

The study discovered that the model treating data as series had superior detection ability for noisy data compared to the one treating data as images and the accuracy of the first arrival time detection was also better for the series data model too.

We compared the results obtained on this island with those obtained at the permanent station, which is considered to have less noise interference, described in Mousavi et al., 2020. It was found that the difference in detection ability between the two models is slight for data obtained at permanent stations with low noise interference, but that the difference in detection ability between the algorithms of the two models is significant in noisy environments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Geophysics
Journal of Applied Geophysics 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
274
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Geophysics with its key objective of responding to pertinent and timely needs, places particular emphasis on methodological developments and innovative applications of geophysical techniques for addressing environmental, engineering, and hydrological problems. Related topical research in exploration geophysics and in soil and rock physics is also covered by the Journal of Applied Geophysics.
期刊最新文献
Seismic Site Characterization of Coimbatore city, Tamil Nadu, India using the Multi-channel Analysis of Surface Waves (MASW) test and Correlations between shear-wave velocity and SPT - N Validation of four resistivity mixing models on field time lapse geoelectrical measurements from fine-grained soil undergoing freeze-thaw cycles Deep anomaly localization using surface-borehole TEM and its application in the Wulong Gold deposit A novel bipolar half-sine current transmitter for helicopter transient electromagnetic surveying Strong motion recording baseline drift recognition based on CNN-LSTM
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1