Ursula Ganz-Blaettler , Sarah Jayne Liptrott , Angela Tolotti , Marco Cefalì , Christine Aeschlimann , Simona Berardi Vilei , Ilaria Colombo , Evi Hatziandreou , Thanos Kosmidis , Helena Linardou , Rosemarie Pfau , Stavroula Sgourou , Cristiana Sessa
{"title":"患者积极参与肿瘤学研究","authors":"Ursula Ganz-Blaettler , Sarah Jayne Liptrott , Angela Tolotti , Marco Cefalì , Christine Aeschlimann , Simona Berardi Vilei , Ilaria Colombo , Evi Hatziandreou , Thanos Kosmidis , Helena Linardou , Rosemarie Pfau , Stavroula Sgourou , Cristiana Sessa","doi":"10.1016/j.ctrv.2024.102822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the status of patient/public involvement (PPI) in oncology research, including definitions, regulatory aspects, ongoing clinical activities in different countries, achievements and difficulties. The 10-year activities of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) Patient Advisory Board are described, illustrating challenges faced and solutions in daily practice.</p><p>Even though clinical data are still limited, it appears PPI has great potential for development in oncology. The drive for precision medicine, activities of patient organizations, pharmaceutical industry interest, and strong support from regulatory agencies, are facilitators to integration of PPI throughout the drug development process. Despite the availability of guidance documents providing recommendations for the implementation of PPI, lack of human and structural resources, training for patients / caregivers and healthcare personnel, and lack of collaboration among stakeholders are some of the main barriers reported. More rigorous reporting of PPI in clinical studies is needed, including the methods to evaluate the impact of PPI and in the representation of patients as partner.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9537,"journal":{"name":"Cancer treatment reviews","volume":"130 ","pages":"Article 102822"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305737224001506/pdfft?md5=4e8063e08f00c74618b2d999d3672a63&pid=1-s2.0-S0305737224001506-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The active involvement of patients in oncology research\",\"authors\":\"Ursula Ganz-Blaettler , Sarah Jayne Liptrott , Angela Tolotti , Marco Cefalì , Christine Aeschlimann , Simona Berardi Vilei , Ilaria Colombo , Evi Hatziandreou , Thanos Kosmidis , Helena Linardou , Rosemarie Pfau , Stavroula Sgourou , Cristiana Sessa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ctrv.2024.102822\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the status of patient/public involvement (PPI) in oncology research, including definitions, regulatory aspects, ongoing clinical activities in different countries, achievements and difficulties. The 10-year activities of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) Patient Advisory Board are described, illustrating challenges faced and solutions in daily practice.</p><p>Even though clinical data are still limited, it appears PPI has great potential for development in oncology. The drive for precision medicine, activities of patient organizations, pharmaceutical industry interest, and strong support from regulatory agencies, are facilitators to integration of PPI throughout the drug development process. Despite the availability of guidance documents providing recommendations for the implementation of PPI, lack of human and structural resources, training for patients / caregivers and healthcare personnel, and lack of collaboration among stakeholders are some of the main barriers reported. More rigorous reporting of PPI in clinical studies is needed, including the methods to evaluate the impact of PPI and in the representation of patients as partner.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer treatment reviews\",\"volume\":\"130 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102822\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305737224001506/pdfft?md5=4e8063e08f00c74618b2d999d3672a63&pid=1-s2.0-S0305737224001506-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer treatment reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305737224001506\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer treatment reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305737224001506","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本综述旨在概述肿瘤研究中患者/公众参与(PPI)的现状,包括定义、监管方面、不同国家正在开展的临床活动、成就和困难。文中介绍了瑞士临床癌症研究小组(SAKK)患者咨询委员会的十年活动,说明了在日常实践中面临的挑战和解决方案。尽管临床数据仍然有限,但患者/公众参与似乎在肿瘤学领域具有巨大的发展潜力。精准医疗的推动、患者组织的活动、制药行业的兴趣以及监管机构的大力支持,都是将 PPI 纳入整个药物开发过程的促进因素。尽管有指导性文件为 PPI 的实施提供建议,但人力和结构性资源的缺乏、对患者/护理人员和医护人员的培训以及利益相关者之间缺乏合作是报告中提到的一些主要障碍。在临床研究中需要更严格地报告 PPI,包括评估 PPI 影响的方法以及患者作为合作伙伴的代表性。
The active involvement of patients in oncology research
The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the status of patient/public involvement (PPI) in oncology research, including definitions, regulatory aspects, ongoing clinical activities in different countries, achievements and difficulties. The 10-year activities of the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK) Patient Advisory Board are described, illustrating challenges faced and solutions in daily practice.
Even though clinical data are still limited, it appears PPI has great potential for development in oncology. The drive for precision medicine, activities of patient organizations, pharmaceutical industry interest, and strong support from regulatory agencies, are facilitators to integration of PPI throughout the drug development process. Despite the availability of guidance documents providing recommendations for the implementation of PPI, lack of human and structural resources, training for patients / caregivers and healthcare personnel, and lack of collaboration among stakeholders are some of the main barriers reported. More rigorous reporting of PPI in clinical studies is needed, including the methods to evaluate the impact of PPI and in the representation of patients as partner.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Treatment Reviews
Journal Overview:
International journal focused on developments in cancer treatment research
Publishes state-of-the-art, authoritative reviews to keep clinicians and researchers informed
Regular Sections in Each Issue:
Comments on Controversy
Tumor Reviews
Anti-tumor Treatments
New Drugs
Complications of Treatment
General and Supportive Care
Laboratory/Clinic Interface
Submission and Editorial System:
Online submission and editorial system for Cancer Treatment Reviews