利用基于 CT 的深度学习预测接受贝伐单抗治疗的上皮性卵巢癌患者的预后

IF 6.8 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY NPJ Precision Oncology Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI:10.1038/s41698-024-00688-6
Xiaoyu Huang, Yong Huang, Kexin Liu, Fenglin Zhang, Zhou Zhu, Kai Xu, Ping Li
{"title":"利用基于 CT 的深度学习预测接受贝伐单抗治疗的上皮性卵巢癌患者的预后","authors":"Xiaoyu Huang, Yong Huang, Kexin Liu, Fenglin Zhang, Zhou Zhu, Kai Xu, Ping Li","doi":"10.1038/s41698-024-00688-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) presents considerable difficulties in prognostication and treatment strategy development. Bevacizumab, an anti-angiogenic medication, has demonstrated potential in enhancing progression-free survival (PFS) in EOC patients. Nevertheless, the identification of individuals at elevated risk of disease progression following treatment remains a challenging task. This study was to develop and validate a deep learning (DL) model using retrospectively collected computed tomography (CT) plain scans of inoperable and recurrent EOC patients receiving bevacizumab treatment diagnosed between January 2013 and January 2024. A total of 525 patients from three different institutions were retrospectively included in the study and divided into training set (N = 400), internal test set (N = 97) and external test set (N = 28). The model’s performance was evaluated using Harrell’s C-index. Patients were categorized into high-risk and low-risk group based on a predetermined cutoff in the training set. Additionally, a multimodal model was evaluated, incorporating the risk score generated by the DL model and the pretreatment level of carbohydrate antigen 125 as input variables. The Net Reclassification Improvement (NRI) metric quantified the reclassification performance of our optimal model in comparison to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging model. The results indicated that DL model achieved a PFS predictive C-index of 0.73 in the internal test set and a C-index of 0.61 in the external test set, along with hazard ratios of 34.24 in the training set (95% CI: 21.7, 54.1; P < 0.001) and 8.16 in the internal test set (95% CI: 2.5, 26.8; P < 0.001). The multimodal model demonstrated a C-index of 0.76 in the internal test set and a C-index of 0.64 in the external test set. Comparative analysis against FIGO staging revealed an NRI of 0.06 (P < 0.001) for the multimodal model. The model presents opportunities for prognostic assessment, treatment strategizing, and ongoing patient monitoring.","PeriodicalId":19433,"journal":{"name":"NPJ Precision Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41698-024-00688-6.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting prognosis for epithelial ovarian cancer patients receiving bevacizumab treatment with CT-based deep learning\",\"authors\":\"Xiaoyu Huang, Yong Huang, Kexin Liu, Fenglin Zhang, Zhou Zhu, Kai Xu, Ping Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41698-024-00688-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) presents considerable difficulties in prognostication and treatment strategy development. Bevacizumab, an anti-angiogenic medication, has demonstrated potential in enhancing progression-free survival (PFS) in EOC patients. Nevertheless, the identification of individuals at elevated risk of disease progression following treatment remains a challenging task. This study was to develop and validate a deep learning (DL) model using retrospectively collected computed tomography (CT) plain scans of inoperable and recurrent EOC patients receiving bevacizumab treatment diagnosed between January 2013 and January 2024. A total of 525 patients from three different institutions were retrospectively included in the study and divided into training set (N = 400), internal test set (N = 97) and external test set (N = 28). The model’s performance was evaluated using Harrell’s C-index. Patients were categorized into high-risk and low-risk group based on a predetermined cutoff in the training set. Additionally, a multimodal model was evaluated, incorporating the risk score generated by the DL model and the pretreatment level of carbohydrate antigen 125 as input variables. The Net Reclassification Improvement (NRI) metric quantified the reclassification performance of our optimal model in comparison to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging model. The results indicated that DL model achieved a PFS predictive C-index of 0.73 in the internal test set and a C-index of 0.61 in the external test set, along with hazard ratios of 34.24 in the training set (95% CI: 21.7, 54.1; P < 0.001) and 8.16 in the internal test set (95% CI: 2.5, 26.8; P < 0.001). The multimodal model demonstrated a C-index of 0.76 in the internal test set and a C-index of 0.64 in the external test set. Comparative analysis against FIGO staging revealed an NRI of 0.06 (P < 0.001) for the multimodal model. The model presents opportunities for prognostic assessment, treatment strategizing, and ongoing patient monitoring.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19433,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NPJ Precision Oncology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41698-024-00688-6.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NPJ Precision Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41698-024-00688-6\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NPJ Precision Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41698-024-00688-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

上皮性卵巢癌(EOC)给预后判断和治疗策略的制定带来了相当大的困难。贝伐珠单抗是一种抗血管生成药物,已证明可提高 EOC 患者的无进展生存期(PFS)。然而,如何识别治疗后疾病进展风险较高的患者仍是一项具有挑战性的任务。本研究旨在利用回顾性收集的 2013 年 1 月至 2024 年 1 月期间接受贝伐珠单抗治疗的无法手术和复发性 EOC 患者的计算机断层扫描(CT)平扫图像,开发并验证深度学习(DL)模型。研究回顾性地纳入了来自三个不同机构的共525例患者,并将其分为训练集(400例)、内部测试集(97例)和外部测试集(28例)。模型的性能采用哈雷尔 C 指数进行评估。根据训练集中预先确定的临界值,将患者分为高风险组和低风险组。此外,还对多模式模型进行了评估,将 DL 模型生成的风险评分和治疗前碳水化合物抗原 125 的水平作为输入变量。与国际妇产科联盟(FIGO)分期模型相比,净再分类改进(NRI)指标量化了我们的最佳模型的再分类性能。结果表明,DL 模型在内部测试集中的 PFS 预测 C 指数为 0.73,在外部测试集中的 C 指数为 0.61,在训练集中的危险比为 34.24(95% CI:21.7, 54.1;P < 0.001),在内部测试集中的危险比为 8.16(95% CI:2.5, 26.8;P < 0.001)。多模态模型在内部测试集中的 C 指数为 0.76,在外部测试集中的 C 指数为 0.64。与 FIGO 分期比较分析显示,多模态模型的 NRI 为 0.06(P < 0.001)。该模型为预后评估、治疗策略制定和患者持续监测提供了机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predicting prognosis for epithelial ovarian cancer patients receiving bevacizumab treatment with CT-based deep learning
Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) presents considerable difficulties in prognostication and treatment strategy development. Bevacizumab, an anti-angiogenic medication, has demonstrated potential in enhancing progression-free survival (PFS) in EOC patients. Nevertheless, the identification of individuals at elevated risk of disease progression following treatment remains a challenging task. This study was to develop and validate a deep learning (DL) model using retrospectively collected computed tomography (CT) plain scans of inoperable and recurrent EOC patients receiving bevacizumab treatment diagnosed between January 2013 and January 2024. A total of 525 patients from three different institutions were retrospectively included in the study and divided into training set (N = 400), internal test set (N = 97) and external test set (N = 28). The model’s performance was evaluated using Harrell’s C-index. Patients were categorized into high-risk and low-risk group based on a predetermined cutoff in the training set. Additionally, a multimodal model was evaluated, incorporating the risk score generated by the DL model and the pretreatment level of carbohydrate antigen 125 as input variables. The Net Reclassification Improvement (NRI) metric quantified the reclassification performance of our optimal model in comparison to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging model. The results indicated that DL model achieved a PFS predictive C-index of 0.73 in the internal test set and a C-index of 0.61 in the external test set, along with hazard ratios of 34.24 in the training set (95% CI: 21.7, 54.1; P < 0.001) and 8.16 in the internal test set (95% CI: 2.5, 26.8; P < 0.001). The multimodal model demonstrated a C-index of 0.76 in the internal test set and a C-index of 0.64 in the external test set. Comparative analysis against FIGO staging revealed an NRI of 0.06 (P < 0.001) for the multimodal model. The model presents opportunities for prognostic assessment, treatment strategizing, and ongoing patient monitoring.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
1.30%
发文量
87
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: Online-only and open access, npj Precision Oncology is an international, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to showcasing cutting-edge scientific research in all facets of precision oncology, spanning from fundamental science to translational applications and clinical medicine.
期刊最新文献
Mechanistic insights into lethal hyper progressive disease induced by PD-L1 inhibitor in metastatic urothelial carcinoma FGFR2-fusions define a clinically actionable molecular subset of pancreatic cancer Integrative analysis of pan-cancer single-cell data reveals a tumor ecosystem subtype predicting immunotherapy response Pan-tumor validation of a NGS fraction-based MSI analysis as a predictor of response to Pembrolizumab Proteomics based selection achieves complete response to HER2 therapy in HER2 IHC 0 breast cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1