血浆ctDNA作为转移性癌症治疗反应生物标志物:RECIST工作组的评估

IF 10 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Clinical Cancer Research Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-24-1883
Alexander W. Wyatt, Saskia Litière, Francois-Clement Bidard, Luc Cabel, Lars Dyrskjøt, Chris A. Karlovich, Klaus Pantel, Joan Petrie, Reena Philip, Hillary S. Andrews, Paz J. Vellanki, Sofie H. Tolmeijer, Xenia Villalobos Alberu, Christian Alfano, Jan Bogaerts, Emiliano Calvo, Alice P. Chen, Rodrigo A. Toledo, Elisabeth G. E. de Vries, Lesley Seymour, Scott A. Laurie, Elena Garralda
{"title":"血浆ctDNA作为转移性癌症治疗反应生物标志物:RECIST工作组的评估","authors":"Alexander W. Wyatt, Saskia Litière, Francois-Clement Bidard, Luc Cabel, Lars Dyrskjøt, Chris A. Karlovich, Klaus Pantel, Joan Petrie, Reena Philip, Hillary S. Andrews, Paz J. Vellanki, Sofie H. Tolmeijer, Xenia Villalobos Alberu, Christian Alfano, Jan Bogaerts, Emiliano Calvo, Alice P. Chen, Rodrigo A. Toledo, Elisabeth G. E. de Vries, Lesley Seymour, Scott A. Laurie, Elena Garralda","doi":"10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-24-1883","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Early indicators of metastatic cancer response to therapy are important for evaluating new drugs and stopping ineffective treatment. The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) based on repeat cancer imaging are widely adopted in clinical trials, are used to identify active regimens that may change practice, and contribute to regulatory approvals. However, these criteria do not provide insight before 6 – 12 weeks of treatment and typically require that patients have measurable disease. Recent data suggests that measuring on-treatment changes in the amount or proportion of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in peripheral blood plasma may accurately identify responding and non-responding cancers at earlier time points. Over the past year, the RECIST working group has evaluated current evidence for plasma ctDNA kinetics as a treatment response biomarker in metastatic cancers and early endpoint in clinical trials, to identify areas of focus for future research and validation. Here, we outline the requirement for large standardized trial datasets, greater scrutiny of optimal ctDNA collection time points and assay thresholds, and consideration of regulatory body guidelines and patient opinions. In particular, clinically-meaningful changes in plasma ctDNA abundance are likely to differ by cancer type and therapy class, and must be assessed before ctDNA can be considered as a potential pan-cancer response evaluation biomarker. Despite the need for additional data, minimally-invasive on-treatment ctDNA measurements hold promise to build upon existing response assessments such as RECIST, and offer opportunities for developing novel early endpoints for modern clinical trials.","PeriodicalId":10279,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cancer Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Plasma ctDNA as a treatment response biomarker in metastatic cancers: evaluation by the RECIST working group\",\"authors\":\"Alexander W. Wyatt, Saskia Litière, Francois-Clement Bidard, Luc Cabel, Lars Dyrskjøt, Chris A. Karlovich, Klaus Pantel, Joan Petrie, Reena Philip, Hillary S. Andrews, Paz J. Vellanki, Sofie H. Tolmeijer, Xenia Villalobos Alberu, Christian Alfano, Jan Bogaerts, Emiliano Calvo, Alice P. Chen, Rodrigo A. Toledo, Elisabeth G. E. de Vries, Lesley Seymour, Scott A. Laurie, Elena Garralda\",\"doi\":\"10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-24-1883\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Early indicators of metastatic cancer response to therapy are important for evaluating new drugs and stopping ineffective treatment. The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) based on repeat cancer imaging are widely adopted in clinical trials, are used to identify active regimens that may change practice, and contribute to regulatory approvals. However, these criteria do not provide insight before 6 – 12 weeks of treatment and typically require that patients have measurable disease. Recent data suggests that measuring on-treatment changes in the amount or proportion of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in peripheral blood plasma may accurately identify responding and non-responding cancers at earlier time points. Over the past year, the RECIST working group has evaluated current evidence for plasma ctDNA kinetics as a treatment response biomarker in metastatic cancers and early endpoint in clinical trials, to identify areas of focus for future research and validation. Here, we outline the requirement for large standardized trial datasets, greater scrutiny of optimal ctDNA collection time points and assay thresholds, and consideration of regulatory body guidelines and patient opinions. In particular, clinically-meaningful changes in plasma ctDNA abundance are likely to differ by cancer type and therapy class, and must be assessed before ctDNA can be considered as a potential pan-cancer response evaluation biomarker. Despite the need for additional data, minimally-invasive on-treatment ctDNA measurements hold promise to build upon existing response assessments such as RECIST, and offer opportunities for developing novel early endpoints for modern clinical trials.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10279,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Cancer Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Cancer Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-24-1883\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Cancer Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-24-1883","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

转移性癌症治疗反应的早期指标对于评估新药和停止无效治疗非常重要。以重复癌症成像为基础的实体瘤反应评估标准(RECIST)在临床试验中被广泛采用,用于确定可能改变治疗方法的有效方案,并有助于监管机构的审批。然而,这些标准并不能在治疗 6-12 周前提供洞察力,而且通常要求患者有可测量的疾病。最近的数据表明,测量外周血血浆中循环肿瘤 DNA (ctDNA) 的数量或比例在治疗中的变化,可以在更早的时间点准确识别有反应和无反应的癌症。在过去一年中,RECIST 工作组评估了血浆 ctDNA 动力学作为转移性癌症治疗反应生物标志物和临床试验早期终点的现有证据,以确定未来研究和验证的重点领域。在此,我们概述了对大型标准化试验数据集的要求、对最佳ctDNA采集时间点和检测阈值的更严格审查,以及对监管机构指南和患者意见的考虑。尤其是血浆ctDNA丰度的临床意义变化很可能因癌症类型和治疗类别而异,在将ctDNA视为潜在的泛癌症反应评估生物标记物之前,必须对其进行评估。尽管还需要更多的数据,但微创的治疗中 ctDNA 测量有望在现有的反应评估(如 RECIST)基础上更上一层楼,并为现代临床试验开发新的早期终点提供了机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Plasma ctDNA as a treatment response biomarker in metastatic cancers: evaluation by the RECIST working group
Early indicators of metastatic cancer response to therapy are important for evaluating new drugs and stopping ineffective treatment. The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) based on repeat cancer imaging are widely adopted in clinical trials, are used to identify active regimens that may change practice, and contribute to regulatory approvals. However, these criteria do not provide insight before 6 – 12 weeks of treatment and typically require that patients have measurable disease. Recent data suggests that measuring on-treatment changes in the amount or proportion of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in peripheral blood plasma may accurately identify responding and non-responding cancers at earlier time points. Over the past year, the RECIST working group has evaluated current evidence for plasma ctDNA kinetics as a treatment response biomarker in metastatic cancers and early endpoint in clinical trials, to identify areas of focus for future research and validation. Here, we outline the requirement for large standardized trial datasets, greater scrutiny of optimal ctDNA collection time points and assay thresholds, and consideration of regulatory body guidelines and patient opinions. In particular, clinically-meaningful changes in plasma ctDNA abundance are likely to differ by cancer type and therapy class, and must be assessed before ctDNA can be considered as a potential pan-cancer response evaluation biomarker. Despite the need for additional data, minimally-invasive on-treatment ctDNA measurements hold promise to build upon existing response assessments such as RECIST, and offer opportunities for developing novel early endpoints for modern clinical trials.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Cancer Research
Clinical Cancer Research 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
20.10
自引率
1.70%
发文量
1207
审稿时长
2.1 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Cancer Research is a journal focusing on groundbreaking research in cancer, specifically in the areas where the laboratory and the clinic intersect. Our primary interest lies in clinical trials that investigate novel treatments, accompanied by research on pharmacology, molecular alterations, and biomarkers that can predict response or resistance to these treatments. Furthermore, we prioritize laboratory and animal studies that explore new drugs and targeted agents with the potential to advance to clinical trials. We also encourage research on targetable mechanisms of cancer development, progression, and metastasis.
期刊最新文献
AACR Cancer Progress Report 2024: Inspiring Science-Fueling Progress-Revolutionizing Care. Cancer in multi-lineage mosaic RASopathies due to pathogenic variants in HRAS or KRAS: a systematic review and meta-analysis A Phase I First-in-Human Study of ABBV-011, a Seizure-Related Homolog Protein 6-Targeting Antibody-Drug Conjugate, in Patients With Small Cell Lung Cancer Clonal Hematopoiesis and Clinical Outcomes in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients Given Androgen Receptor Pathway Inhibitors (Alliance A031201) Update on Whole-body MRI Surveillance for Pediatric Cancer Predisposition Syndromes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1