{"title":"大肠癌的代谢负荷、遗传易感性、发病风险和全因死亡率","authors":"Jianhui Zhao, Erxu Xue, Siyun Zhou, Meng Zhang, Jing Sun, Yuqian Tan, Xue Li","doi":"10.1093/jnci/djae223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Allostatic load (AL) reflects the cumulative burden of chronic stress throughout life, potentially influencing the onset and prognosis of cancer. However, the associations between AL, colorectal cancer (CRC) risk and all-cause mortality in patients with CRC remain unclear. Methods We analyzed the association between AL and CRC risk in 304,959 adults and all-cause mortality in 1,794 patients with CRC from the UK Biobank, using Cox proportional hazards regression models. Results Compared to the AL level in the first quartile, individuals in the second to fourth quartiles had a respective 20%, 29%, and 43% increased risk of CRC; 15%, 24%, and 42% increased risk for colon cancer; and 30%, 38%, and 45% increased risk for rectal cancer. We identified a positive dose-gradient association of AL score with CRC risk, including colon and rectal cancer. Additionally, the association between AL and increased risk of CRC was observed across different strata of genetic susceptibility for CRC. Eliminating AL exposures could prevent nearly 39.24% (95% CI: 36.16-42.32) of CRC incident cases. Meanwhile, a significant association between the AL and all-cause mortality in patients with CRC was found, with a HR of 1.71 (95% CI: 1.16-2.50) for the fourth quartile compared to the AL score in the first quartile, demonstrating a positive dose-response relationship. Conclusion High AL was associated with increased CRC risk and all-cause mortality in CRC patients. Future research should prioritize the development of cognitive or behavioral intervention strategies to mitigate the adverse effects of AL on CRC incidence and prognosis.","PeriodicalId":501635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Allostatic Load, Genetic Susceptibility, Incidence Risk, and All-cause Mortality of Colorectal Cancer\",\"authors\":\"Jianhui Zhao, Erxu Xue, Siyun Zhou, Meng Zhang, Jing Sun, Yuqian Tan, Xue Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jnci/djae223\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Allostatic load (AL) reflects the cumulative burden of chronic stress throughout life, potentially influencing the onset and prognosis of cancer. However, the associations between AL, colorectal cancer (CRC) risk and all-cause mortality in patients with CRC remain unclear. Methods We analyzed the association between AL and CRC risk in 304,959 adults and all-cause mortality in 1,794 patients with CRC from the UK Biobank, using Cox proportional hazards regression models. Results Compared to the AL level in the first quartile, individuals in the second to fourth quartiles had a respective 20%, 29%, and 43% increased risk of CRC; 15%, 24%, and 42% increased risk for colon cancer; and 30%, 38%, and 45% increased risk for rectal cancer. We identified a positive dose-gradient association of AL score with CRC risk, including colon and rectal cancer. Additionally, the association between AL and increased risk of CRC was observed across different strata of genetic susceptibility for CRC. Eliminating AL exposures could prevent nearly 39.24% (95% CI: 36.16-42.32) of CRC incident cases. Meanwhile, a significant association between the AL and all-cause mortality in patients with CRC was found, with a HR of 1.71 (95% CI: 1.16-2.50) for the fourth quartile compared to the AL score in the first quartile, demonstrating a positive dose-response relationship. Conclusion High AL was associated with increased CRC risk and all-cause mortality in CRC patients. Future research should prioritize the development of cognitive or behavioral intervention strategies to mitigate the adverse effects of AL on CRC incidence and prognosis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501635,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the National Cancer Institute\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the National Cancer Institute\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djae223\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Cancer Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djae223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景 静态负荷(AL)反映了一生中慢性压力的累积负担,有可能影响癌症的发病和预后。然而,AL、结直肠癌(CRC)风险和 CRC 患者全因死亡率之间的关系仍不清楚。方法 我们使用 Cox 比例危险回归模型分析了英国生物库中 304,959 名成人的 AL 与 CRC 风险以及 1,794 名 CRC 患者的全因死亡率之间的关系。结果 与 AL 水平处于第一四分位数的人相比,处于第二至第四四分位数的人患 CRC 的风险分别增加了 20%、29% 和 43%;患结肠癌的风险分别增加了 15%、24% 和 42%;患直肠癌的风险分别增加了 30%、38% 和 45%。我们发现 AL 评分与包括结肠癌和直肠癌在内的癌症风险呈剂量梯度正相关。此外,在不同的 CRC 遗传易感人群中,都能观察到 AL 与 CRC 风险增加之间的关联。消除 AL 暴露可预防近 39.24%(95% CI:36.16-42.32)的 CRC 发病。同时,研究还发现 AL 与 CRC 患者的全因死亡率之间存在显著关联,与 AL 分值位于第一四分位数的患者相比,AL 分值位于第四四分位数的患者的 HR 为 1.71(95% CI:1.16-2.50),这表明两者之间存在正的剂量-反应关系。结论 AL值高与CRC患者的CRC风险和全因死亡率增加有关。未来的研究应优先发展认知或行为干预策略,以减轻 AL 对 CRC 发病率和预后的不利影响。
Allostatic Load, Genetic Susceptibility, Incidence Risk, and All-cause Mortality of Colorectal Cancer
Background Allostatic load (AL) reflects the cumulative burden of chronic stress throughout life, potentially influencing the onset and prognosis of cancer. However, the associations between AL, colorectal cancer (CRC) risk and all-cause mortality in patients with CRC remain unclear. Methods We analyzed the association between AL and CRC risk in 304,959 adults and all-cause mortality in 1,794 patients with CRC from the UK Biobank, using Cox proportional hazards regression models. Results Compared to the AL level in the first quartile, individuals in the second to fourth quartiles had a respective 20%, 29%, and 43% increased risk of CRC; 15%, 24%, and 42% increased risk for colon cancer; and 30%, 38%, and 45% increased risk for rectal cancer. We identified a positive dose-gradient association of AL score with CRC risk, including colon and rectal cancer. Additionally, the association between AL and increased risk of CRC was observed across different strata of genetic susceptibility for CRC. Eliminating AL exposures could prevent nearly 39.24% (95% CI: 36.16-42.32) of CRC incident cases. Meanwhile, a significant association between the AL and all-cause mortality in patients with CRC was found, with a HR of 1.71 (95% CI: 1.16-2.50) for the fourth quartile compared to the AL score in the first quartile, demonstrating a positive dose-response relationship. Conclusion High AL was associated with increased CRC risk and all-cause mortality in CRC patients. Future research should prioritize the development of cognitive or behavioral intervention strategies to mitigate the adverse effects of AL on CRC incidence and prognosis.