骨水泥在骨链重建中的应用:系统回顾与荟萃分析

IF 0.9 Q3 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY Acta otorrinolaringologica espanola Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.otorri.2024.01.003
Luís Roque Reis , Kaamil Gani , André Sá Pereira , Pedro Branco , Pedro Escada
{"title":"骨水泥在骨链重建中的应用:系统回顾与荟萃分析","authors":"Luís Roque Reis ,&nbsp;Kaamil Gani ,&nbsp;André Sá Pereira ,&nbsp;Pedro Branco ,&nbsp;Pedro Escada","doi":"10.1016/j.otorri.2024.01.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To compare the hearing outcomes of ossicular chain reconstruction using bone cement versus other materials such as prostheses and autografts.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study included articles that compared hearing outcomes in patients with conductive hearing loss who underwent stapes revision surgery or chronic otitis media surgery. A systematic search for articles from January 2000 to February 2022 was conducted in Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. Only articles in English were included. An effective postoperative air-bone gap (ABG) was defined as ≤20 dB. A bias assessment tool was developed according to Cochrane guidelines, and the chi-square test was used to evaluate the mean age of the samples.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 418 studies that met the selection criteria, only seven were eligible for this study, consisting of 187 patients in the bone cement group and 173 in the non-bone cement group. Ossiculoplasty using bone cement yielded significantly better results, with a combined odds ratio (OR) of 2.03 (95% CI: 1.16–3.55, p = 0.01).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The results of this study suggest that the effectiveness of bone cement in ossiculoplasty was greater than that of other materials in chronic otitis media surgery or stapes revision surgery, with a higher number of patients achieving ABG ≤20 dB.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7019,"journal":{"name":"Acta otorrinolaringologica espanola","volume":"75 5","pages":"Pages 316-323"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bone cement in ossicular chain reconstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Luís Roque Reis ,&nbsp;Kaamil Gani ,&nbsp;André Sá Pereira ,&nbsp;Pedro Branco ,&nbsp;Pedro Escada\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.otorri.2024.01.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To compare the hearing outcomes of ossicular chain reconstruction using bone cement versus other materials such as prostheses and autografts.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study included articles that compared hearing outcomes in patients with conductive hearing loss who underwent stapes revision surgery or chronic otitis media surgery. A systematic search for articles from January 2000 to February 2022 was conducted in Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. Only articles in English were included. An effective postoperative air-bone gap (ABG) was defined as ≤20 dB. A bias assessment tool was developed according to Cochrane guidelines, and the chi-square test was used to evaluate the mean age of the samples.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 418 studies that met the selection criteria, only seven were eligible for this study, consisting of 187 patients in the bone cement group and 173 in the non-bone cement group. Ossiculoplasty using bone cement yielded significantly better results, with a combined odds ratio (OR) of 2.03 (95% CI: 1.16–3.55, p = 0.01).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The results of this study suggest that the effectiveness of bone cement in ossiculoplasty was greater than that of other materials in chronic otitis media surgery or stapes revision surgery, with a higher number of patients achieving ABG ≤20 dB.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta otorrinolaringologica espanola\",\"volume\":\"75 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 316-323\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta otorrinolaringologica espanola\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001651924000050\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta otorrinolaringologica espanola","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001651924000050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

方法本研究纳入了对接受镫骨翻修手术或慢性中耳炎手术的传导性听力损失患者的听力结果进行比较的文章。研究人员在 Medline、Embase 和 Cochrane Library 数据库中对 2000 年 1 月至 2022 年 2 月期间的文章进行了系统检索。仅纳入英文文章。术后有效气骨间隙(ABG)定义为≤20 dB。结果 在符合筛选标准的418篇研究中,只有7篇符合本研究的条件,其中骨水泥组187名患者,非骨水泥组173名患者。结论本研究结果表明,在慢性中耳炎手术或镫骨翻修手术中,骨水泥在听骨成形术中的效果优于其他材料,有更多患者的ABG达到≤20 dB。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bone cement in ossicular chain reconstruction: systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives

To compare the hearing outcomes of ossicular chain reconstruction using bone cement versus other materials such as prostheses and autografts.

Methods

This study included articles that compared hearing outcomes in patients with conductive hearing loss who underwent stapes revision surgery or chronic otitis media surgery. A systematic search for articles from January 2000 to February 2022 was conducted in Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. Only articles in English were included. An effective postoperative air-bone gap (ABG) was defined as ≤20 dB. A bias assessment tool was developed according to Cochrane guidelines, and the chi-square test was used to evaluate the mean age of the samples.

Results

Of the 418 studies that met the selection criteria, only seven were eligible for this study, consisting of 187 patients in the bone cement group and 173 in the non-bone cement group. Ossiculoplasty using bone cement yielded significantly better results, with a combined odds ratio (OR) of 2.03 (95% CI: 1.16–3.55, p = 0.01).

Conclusions

The results of this study suggest that the effectiveness of bone cement in ossiculoplasty was greater than that of other materials in chronic otitis media surgery or stapes revision surgery, with a higher number of patients achieving ABG ≤20 dB.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
20.00%
发文量
44
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Es la revista más importante en español dedicada a la especialidad. Ofrece progresos científicos y técnicos tanto a nivel de originales como de casos clínicos. Además, es la Publicación Oficial de la Sociedad Española de Otorrinolaringología y Patología Cérvico-Facial y está presente en los más prestigiosos índices de referencia.
期刊最新文献
Retrolabyrinthine approach to the lateral skull base: The value of preoperative temporal bone CT analysis Situación actual de la tutoría en la formación especializada en otorrinolaringología en España. ¿Dónde estamos? ¿Hacia dónde queremos ir? Prevalencia de apnea obstructiva del sueño en pacientes obesos candidatos a cirugía bariátrica y cuestionarios predictores Recurrent peritonsillar abscess in adults: Incidence and risk factors in a prospective longitudinal cohort Enhancing the coverage and rotation of anterior ethmoidal artery flap for septal perforation closure: Insights from a flap design study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1