火星低空(≤500 公里)的总磁场扰动:2014-2023 年的 MAVEN 观测

IF 2.6 2区 地球科学 Q2 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI:10.1029/2024JA033029
Jaeheung Park
{"title":"火星低空(≤500 公里)的总磁场扰动:2014-2023 年的 MAVEN 观测","authors":"Jaeheung Park","doi":"10.1029/2024JA033029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Magnetic perturbations in the Martian ionosphere are often considered as representing plasma irregularities, but thorough statistical comparisons between the two independent phenomena have been rarely conducted. In this study, we investigate the statistical relationship between total magnetic field perturbations and those of O<sub>2</sub><sup>+</sup> density as observed by the Mars Atmosphere and Volatile EvolutioN (MAVEN) spacecraft at altitudes below 500 km in 2014–2023. From the 1 Hz time series of magnetic field strength, perturbation intensity is estimated by subtracting a signal smoothed with a Savitzky-Golay filter (window size ∼36 km). Statistically, the magnetic perturbations are stronger on the dayside than at night, in the local summer hemisphere than in winter, and away from crustal magnetic anomalies than nearby. Also, day-to-day variability of the magnetic perturbations exhibits a weak but significant correlation with that of solar wind electron density. The statistical behavior of total magnetic field perturbations is not the same as that of O<sub>2</sub><sup>+</sup> density perturbations: that is, the former is not a perfect proxy for the latter. The seemingly counter-intuitive discrepancy can be explained by effects of inhomogeneous background magnetic field strength (participating in total pressure balance across plasma perturbations) and localized ionospheric currents at altitudes unreachable by MAVEN.</p>","PeriodicalId":15894,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JA033029","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Total Magnetic Field Perturbations at Martian Low Altitudes (≤500 km): MAVEN Observations in 2014–2023\",\"authors\":\"Jaeheung Park\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2024JA033029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Magnetic perturbations in the Martian ionosphere are often considered as representing plasma irregularities, but thorough statistical comparisons between the two independent phenomena have been rarely conducted. In this study, we investigate the statistical relationship between total magnetic field perturbations and those of O<sub>2</sub><sup>+</sup> density as observed by the Mars Atmosphere and Volatile EvolutioN (MAVEN) spacecraft at altitudes below 500 km in 2014–2023. From the 1 Hz time series of magnetic field strength, perturbation intensity is estimated by subtracting a signal smoothed with a Savitzky-Golay filter (window size ∼36 km). Statistically, the magnetic perturbations are stronger on the dayside than at night, in the local summer hemisphere than in winter, and away from crustal magnetic anomalies than nearby. Also, day-to-day variability of the magnetic perturbations exhibits a weak but significant correlation with that of solar wind electron density. The statistical behavior of total magnetic field perturbations is not the same as that of O<sub>2</sub><sup>+</sup> density perturbations: that is, the former is not a perfect proxy for the latter. The seemingly counter-intuitive discrepancy can be explained by effects of inhomogeneous background magnetic field strength (participating in total pressure balance across plasma perturbations) and localized ionospheric currents at altitudes unreachable by MAVEN.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15894,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2024JA033029\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JA033029\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JA033029","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

火星电离层中的磁扰动通常被认为代表等离子体的不规则性,但很少对这两种独立现象进行彻底的统计比较。在本研究中,我们研究了 2014-2023 年火星大气与挥发物演化(MAVEN)航天器在 500 公里以下高度观测到的总磁场扰动与 O2+ 密度扰动之间的统计关系。从磁场强度的 1 赫兹时间序列中,通过减去用萨维茨基-戈莱滤波器(窗口大小∼36 千米)平滑的信号,估算出扰动强度。据统计,白天的磁扰动强于夜间,当地夏半球的磁扰动强于冬半球,远离地壳磁异常的磁扰动强于附近的磁扰动。此外,磁扰动的日变化与太阳风电子密度的日变化有微弱但显著的相关性。总磁场扰动的统计行为与 O2+密度扰动的统计行为并不相同:也就是说,前者并不能完美地代表后者。这种看似反直觉的差异可以用不均匀背景磁场强度(参与等离子体扰动的总压力平衡)和 MAVEN 无法到达的高度上的局部电离层电流的影响来解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Total Magnetic Field Perturbations at Martian Low Altitudes (≤500 km): MAVEN Observations in 2014–2023

Magnetic perturbations in the Martian ionosphere are often considered as representing plasma irregularities, but thorough statistical comparisons between the two independent phenomena have been rarely conducted. In this study, we investigate the statistical relationship between total magnetic field perturbations and those of O2+ density as observed by the Mars Atmosphere and Volatile EvolutioN (MAVEN) spacecraft at altitudes below 500 km in 2014–2023. From the 1 Hz time series of magnetic field strength, perturbation intensity is estimated by subtracting a signal smoothed with a Savitzky-Golay filter (window size ∼36 km). Statistically, the magnetic perturbations are stronger on the dayside than at night, in the local summer hemisphere than in winter, and away from crustal magnetic anomalies than nearby. Also, day-to-day variability of the magnetic perturbations exhibits a weak but significant correlation with that of solar wind electron density. The statistical behavior of total magnetic field perturbations is not the same as that of O2+ density perturbations: that is, the former is not a perfect proxy for the latter. The seemingly counter-intuitive discrepancy can be explained by effects of inhomogeneous background magnetic field strength (participating in total pressure balance across plasma perturbations) and localized ionospheric currents at altitudes unreachable by MAVEN.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics
Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geophysics
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
35.70%
发文量
570
期刊最新文献
Nightside Electron Precipitation Patterns as Observed by ELFIN and CIRBE CubeSats Martian Ionosphere-Thermosphere Coupling in Longitude Structures: Statistical Results for the Main Ionization Peak Height Earthward-Tailward Asymmetry of Plasma Temperature in Reconnection Outflow in Earth's Magnetotail Electron Scattering Due To Asymmetric Drift-Orbit Bifurcation: Geometric Jumps of Adiabatic Invariant Test Particle Simulations of the Butterfly Distribution of Relativistic Electrons in Magnetic Dips
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1