口服 SERDs 改变了激素受体阳性乳腺癌的治疗格局,综述

IF 9.6 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Cancer treatment reviews Pub Date : 2024-09-11 DOI:10.1016/j.ctrv.2024.102825
{"title":"口服 SERDs 改变了激素受体阳性乳腺癌的治疗格局,综述","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ctrv.2024.102825","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Primary and acquired endocrine resistance remains a major issue in the treatment of hormone receptor positive breast cancer. Acquired resistance often results from estrogen receptor 1 (<em>ESR1</em>) mutations leading to estrogen independent estrogen receptor activation. Selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) induce degradation of this receptor, thereby overcoming this resistance. The intramuscular administration and modest efficacy of fulvestrant, the first SERD, triggered development of oral, more potent SERDs. This narrative review gives an overview of the current evidence regarding this new drug class.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Medline/PubMed and Embase database were screened using a systematic search strategy. We assessed the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium abstract reports, the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) and American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) meeting resources by applying the following terms: ‘SERD’, ‘giredestrant’, ‘elacestrant’, ‘imlunestrant’, ‘amcenestrant’, ‘camizestrant’ and ‘rintodestrant’. ClinicalTrials.gov was consulted to include ongoing trials.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The search retrieved 1191 articles. After screening, 108 articles were retained. In the phase 3 EMERALD trial, elacestrant demonstrated benefit in progression free survival (PFS) in second line metastatic disease in postmenopausal women or men, leading to Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) approval for the <em>ESR1</em> mutated population. This PFS advantage was more pronounced among patients who had priorly received at least 12 months of a cyclin-dependent kinases 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i). In the phase 2 SERENA-2 trial, camizestrant improved PFS as second line treatment. However, trials of giredestrant and amcenestrant failed to show PFS benefit in second line metastatic setting. In the preoperative setting, several oral SERDs resulted in a significant reduction of tumoral proliferation. Furthermore, many trials are still in progress.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Oral SERDs constitute an exciting new drug class. Ongoing and future research will further refine the role of these drugs next to standard endocrine treatments and targeted therapies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9537,"journal":{"name":"Cancer treatment reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305737224001531/pdfft?md5=8421fea5bbb25d737f5e4ddb8c86757b&pid=1-s2.0-S0305737224001531-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oral SERDs changing the scenery in hormone receptor positive breast cancer, a comprehensive review\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ctrv.2024.102825\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Primary and acquired endocrine resistance remains a major issue in the treatment of hormone receptor positive breast cancer. Acquired resistance often results from estrogen receptor 1 (<em>ESR1</em>) mutations leading to estrogen independent estrogen receptor activation. Selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) induce degradation of this receptor, thereby overcoming this resistance. The intramuscular administration and modest efficacy of fulvestrant, the first SERD, triggered development of oral, more potent SERDs. This narrative review gives an overview of the current evidence regarding this new drug class.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Medline/PubMed and Embase database were screened using a systematic search strategy. We assessed the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium abstract reports, the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) and American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) meeting resources by applying the following terms: ‘SERD’, ‘giredestrant’, ‘elacestrant’, ‘imlunestrant’, ‘amcenestrant’, ‘camizestrant’ and ‘rintodestrant’. ClinicalTrials.gov was consulted to include ongoing trials.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The search retrieved 1191 articles. After screening, 108 articles were retained. In the phase 3 EMERALD trial, elacestrant demonstrated benefit in progression free survival (PFS) in second line metastatic disease in postmenopausal women or men, leading to Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) approval for the <em>ESR1</em> mutated population. This PFS advantage was more pronounced among patients who had priorly received at least 12 months of a cyclin-dependent kinases 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i). In the phase 2 SERENA-2 trial, camizestrant improved PFS as second line treatment. However, trials of giredestrant and amcenestrant failed to show PFS benefit in second line metastatic setting. In the preoperative setting, several oral SERDs resulted in a significant reduction of tumoral proliferation. Furthermore, many trials are still in progress.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Oral SERDs constitute an exciting new drug class. Ongoing and future research will further refine the role of these drugs next to standard endocrine treatments and targeted therapies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer treatment reviews\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305737224001531/pdfft?md5=8421fea5bbb25d737f5e4ddb8c86757b&pid=1-s2.0-S0305737224001531-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer treatment reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305737224001531\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer treatment reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305737224001531","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景原发性和获得性内分泌耐药性仍然是治疗激素受体阳性乳腺癌的一个主要问题。获得性耐药性通常是由于雌激素受体 1(ESR1)突变导致雌激素受体活化。选择性雌激素受体降解剂(SERDs)可诱导雌激素受体降解,从而克服这种耐药性。第一种选择性雌激素受体降解剂氟维司群的肌肉注射和适度疗效引发了口服、更强效的选择性雌激素受体降解剂的开发。这篇叙述性综述概述了有关这一类新药的现有证据。方法采用系统性检索策略筛选了Medline/PubMed和Embase数据库。我们使用以下术语评估了圣安东尼奥乳腺癌研讨会摘要报告、欧洲肿瘤内科学会 (ESMO) 和美国临床肿瘤学会 (ASCO) 会议资源:SERD"、"giredestrant"、"elacestrant"、"imlunestrant"、"amcenestrant"、"camizestrant "和 "rintodestrant"。检索结果检索到 1191 篇文章。经过筛选,保留了 108 篇文章。在EMERALD 3期试验中,艾拉司特显示出对绝经后女性或男性二线转移性疾病的无进展生存期(PFS)有益,从而获得了美国食品药品管理局(FDA)和欧洲药品管理局(EMA)对ESR1突变人群的批准。这种 PFS 优势在之前接受过至少 12 个月的细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶 4/6 抑制剂(CDK4/6i)治疗的患者中更为明显。在二期 SERENA-2 试验中,作为二线治疗,坎米司群改善了患者的 PFS。然而,吉瑞司群和安塞司群的试验未能显示二线转移性治疗的 PFS 获益。在术前治疗中,几种口服 SERDs 可显著减少肿瘤增殖。此外,许多试验仍在进行中。正在进行和未来的研究将进一步完善这些药物在标准内分泌治疗和靶向治疗中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Oral SERDs changing the scenery in hormone receptor positive breast cancer, a comprehensive review

Background

Primary and acquired endocrine resistance remains a major issue in the treatment of hormone receptor positive breast cancer. Acquired resistance often results from estrogen receptor 1 (ESR1) mutations leading to estrogen independent estrogen receptor activation. Selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs) induce degradation of this receptor, thereby overcoming this resistance. The intramuscular administration and modest efficacy of fulvestrant, the first SERD, triggered development of oral, more potent SERDs. This narrative review gives an overview of the current evidence regarding this new drug class.

Methods

Medline/PubMed and Embase database were screened using a systematic search strategy. We assessed the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium abstract reports, the European Society of Medical Oncology (ESMO) and American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) meeting resources by applying the following terms: ‘SERD’, ‘giredestrant’, ‘elacestrant’, ‘imlunestrant’, ‘amcenestrant’, ‘camizestrant’ and ‘rintodestrant’. ClinicalTrials.gov was consulted to include ongoing trials.

Results

The search retrieved 1191 articles. After screening, 108 articles were retained. In the phase 3 EMERALD trial, elacestrant demonstrated benefit in progression free survival (PFS) in second line metastatic disease in postmenopausal women or men, leading to Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) approval for the ESR1 mutated population. This PFS advantage was more pronounced among patients who had priorly received at least 12 months of a cyclin-dependent kinases 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i). In the phase 2 SERENA-2 trial, camizestrant improved PFS as second line treatment. However, trials of giredestrant and amcenestrant failed to show PFS benefit in second line metastatic setting. In the preoperative setting, several oral SERDs resulted in a significant reduction of tumoral proliferation. Furthermore, many trials are still in progress.

Conclusion

Oral SERDs constitute an exciting new drug class. Ongoing and future research will further refine the role of these drugs next to standard endocrine treatments and targeted therapies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer treatment reviews
Cancer treatment reviews 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
21.40
自引率
0.80%
发文量
109
审稿时长
13 days
期刊介绍: Cancer Treatment Reviews Journal Overview: International journal focused on developments in cancer treatment research Publishes state-of-the-art, authoritative reviews to keep clinicians and researchers informed Regular Sections in Each Issue: Comments on Controversy Tumor Reviews Anti-tumor Treatments New Drugs Complications of Treatment General and Supportive Care Laboratory/Clinic Interface Submission and Editorial System: Online submission and editorial system for Cancer Treatment Reviews
期刊最新文献
The landscape of combining immune checkpoint inhibitors with novel Therapies: Secret alliances against breast cancer Induction treatment with FOLFIRINOX or oxaliplatin-based doublet followed by long-course chemoradiotherapy and surgery in locally advanced rectal cancer. A systematic review and pooled analysis from phase II and III trials. Oral SERDs changing the scenery in hormone receptor positive breast cancer, a comprehensive review Bone complications of cancer treatment Abemaciclib increases the risk of venous thromboembolism in breast cancer: Integrate meta-analysis, pharmacovigilance database analysis, and in vitro validation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1