{"title":"研究搅拌摩擦挤压法生产铝硅管过程中工具锥角的影响","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jmapro.2024.09.047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study employed Friction Stir Extrusion (FSE) on the LM13 aluminum alloy to fabricate tubes using three distinct tool head designs: cylindrical, 30° taper, and 60° taper profiles. A comprehensive analysis of the microstructures and mechanical properties of the resulting samples was performed. A numerical study was conducted to model the process dynamics, focusing on temperature and strain distributions, material flow patterns, and the evolution of force, torque, strain, and strain rate. Findings indicated that the axial force with the cylindrical tool was 4–5 times greater than with tapered tools, while forces for the 30° and 60° taper tools were comparable. The 30° taper tool generated the highest strain value of 280 mm/mm, which significantly enhanced the mechanical strength of the pipe up to 139 MPa while it was 85 MPa in the base metal. However, the cylindrical tool had a much higher average strain rate of around 40 1/s, compared to below 10 1/s for the tapered tools, yet it was less effective at reducing porosity and breaking Si particles due to insufficient strain. Additionally, material flow patterns differed: with the cylindrical tool, flow moved from the periphery to the center, while tapered tools directed flow from the center toward the pipe wall.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16148,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Manufacturing Processes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1526612524009691/pdfft?md5=65c439092538f1ae7bf28f7dc318380b&pid=1-s2.0-S1526612524009691-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining the impact of tool taper angle in Al-Si tube manufacturing by friction stir extrusion\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmapro.2024.09.047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study employed Friction Stir Extrusion (FSE) on the LM13 aluminum alloy to fabricate tubes using three distinct tool head designs: cylindrical, 30° taper, and 60° taper profiles. A comprehensive analysis of the microstructures and mechanical properties of the resulting samples was performed. A numerical study was conducted to model the process dynamics, focusing on temperature and strain distributions, material flow patterns, and the evolution of force, torque, strain, and strain rate. Findings indicated that the axial force with the cylindrical tool was 4–5 times greater than with tapered tools, while forces for the 30° and 60° taper tools were comparable. The 30° taper tool generated the highest strain value of 280 mm/mm, which significantly enhanced the mechanical strength of the pipe up to 139 MPa while it was 85 MPa in the base metal. However, the cylindrical tool had a much higher average strain rate of around 40 1/s, compared to below 10 1/s for the tapered tools, yet it was less effective at reducing porosity and breaking Si particles due to insufficient strain. Additionally, material flow patterns differed: with the cylindrical tool, flow moved from the periphery to the center, while tapered tools directed flow from the center toward the pipe wall.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16148,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Manufacturing Processes\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1526612524009691/pdfft?md5=65c439092538f1ae7bf28f7dc318380b&pid=1-s2.0-S1526612524009691-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Manufacturing Processes\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1526612524009691\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Manufacturing Processes","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1526612524009691","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Examining the impact of tool taper angle in Al-Si tube manufacturing by friction stir extrusion
This study employed Friction Stir Extrusion (FSE) on the LM13 aluminum alloy to fabricate tubes using three distinct tool head designs: cylindrical, 30° taper, and 60° taper profiles. A comprehensive analysis of the microstructures and mechanical properties of the resulting samples was performed. A numerical study was conducted to model the process dynamics, focusing on temperature and strain distributions, material flow patterns, and the evolution of force, torque, strain, and strain rate. Findings indicated that the axial force with the cylindrical tool was 4–5 times greater than with tapered tools, while forces for the 30° and 60° taper tools were comparable. The 30° taper tool generated the highest strain value of 280 mm/mm, which significantly enhanced the mechanical strength of the pipe up to 139 MPa while it was 85 MPa in the base metal. However, the cylindrical tool had a much higher average strain rate of around 40 1/s, compared to below 10 1/s for the tapered tools, yet it was less effective at reducing porosity and breaking Si particles due to insufficient strain. Additionally, material flow patterns differed: with the cylindrical tool, flow moved from the periphery to the center, while tapered tools directed flow from the center toward the pipe wall.
期刊介绍:
The aim of the Journal of Manufacturing Processes (JMP) is to exchange current and future directions of manufacturing processes research, development and implementation, and to publish archival scholarly literature with a view to advancing state-of-the-art manufacturing processes and encouraging innovation for developing new and efficient processes. The journal will also publish from other research communities for rapid communication of innovative new concepts. Special-topic issues on emerging technologies and invited papers will also be published.