不完全信息离散选择模型的识别

IF 9.9 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Journal of Econometrics Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jeconom.2024.105854
Cristina Gualdani , Shruti Sinha
{"title":"不完全信息离散选择模型的识别","authors":"Cristina Gualdani ,&nbsp;Shruti Sinha","doi":"10.1016/j.jeconom.2024.105854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We study identification of preferences in static single-agent discrete choice models where decision makers may be imperfectly informed about the state of the world. Leveraging the notion of one-player Bayes Correlated Equilibrium by Bergemann and Morris (2016), we provide a tractable characterisation of the sharp identified set. We develop a procedure to practically construct the sharp identified set following a sieve approach, and provide sharp bounds on counterfactual outcomes of interest. Using our methodology and data on the 2017 UK general election, we estimate a spatial voting model under weak assumptions on agents’ information about the returns to voting. Counterfactual exercises quantify the consequences of imperfect information on the well-being of voters and parties.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15629,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Econometrics","volume":"244 1","pages":"Article 105854"},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304407624001994/pdfft?md5=739faa29de0adbc84f11ae50ef571592&pid=1-s2.0-S0304407624001994-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identification in discrete choice models with imperfect information\",\"authors\":\"Cristina Gualdani ,&nbsp;Shruti Sinha\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jeconom.2024.105854\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We study identification of preferences in static single-agent discrete choice models where decision makers may be imperfectly informed about the state of the world. Leveraging the notion of one-player Bayes Correlated Equilibrium by Bergemann and Morris (2016), we provide a tractable characterisation of the sharp identified set. We develop a procedure to practically construct the sharp identified set following a sieve approach, and provide sharp bounds on counterfactual outcomes of interest. Using our methodology and data on the 2017 UK general election, we estimate a spatial voting model under weak assumptions on agents’ information about the returns to voting. Counterfactual exercises quantify the consequences of imperfect information on the well-being of voters and parties.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15629,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Econometrics\",\"volume\":\"244 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 105854\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304407624001994/pdfft?md5=739faa29de0adbc84f11ae50ef571592&pid=1-s2.0-S0304407624001994-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Econometrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304407624001994\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Econometrics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304407624001994","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们研究的是静态单代理离散选择模型中的偏好识别,在这种模型中,决策者可能无法完全了解世界的状况。利用 Bergemann 和 Morris(2016 年)提出的单人贝叶斯相关均衡的概念,我们提供了尖锐识别集的可操作性特征。我们开发了一套程序,按照筛子法实际构建尖锐识别集,并提供了相关反事实结果的尖锐界限。利用我们的方法和 2017 年英国大选的数据,我们估算了一个空间投票模型,该模型是在对代理人关于投票回报信息的弱假设条件下建立的。反事实练习量化了不完全信息对选民和政党福祉的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Identification in discrete choice models with imperfect information

We study identification of preferences in static single-agent discrete choice models where decision makers may be imperfectly informed about the state of the world. Leveraging the notion of one-player Bayes Correlated Equilibrium by Bergemann and Morris (2016), we provide a tractable characterisation of the sharp identified set. We develop a procedure to practically construct the sharp identified set following a sieve approach, and provide sharp bounds on counterfactual outcomes of interest. Using our methodology and data on the 2017 UK general election, we estimate a spatial voting model under weak assumptions on agents’ information about the returns to voting. Counterfactual exercises quantify the consequences of imperfect information on the well-being of voters and parties.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Econometrics
Journal of Econometrics 社会科学-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
1.60%
发文量
220
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Econometrics serves as an outlet for important, high quality, new research in both theoretical and applied econometrics. The scope of the Journal includes papers dealing with identification, estimation, testing, decision, and prediction issues encountered in economic research. Classical Bayesian statistics, and machine learning methods, are decidedly within the range of the Journal''s interests. The Annals of Econometrics is a supplement to the Journal of Econometrics.
期刊最新文献
GLS under monotone heteroskedasticity Multivariate spatiotemporal models with low rank coefficient matrix Estimating and testing for smooth structural changes in moment condition models Validating approximate slope homogeneity in large panels Inference in cluster randomized trials with matched pairs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1