黄芩的化学成分和功能分析比较:使用超高效液相色谱-q-orbitrap MS/MS 进行黄芩精煮粉末与传统煎药片的比较

IF 6 1区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY LWT - Food Science and Technology Pub Date : 2024-09-14 DOI:10.1016/j.lwt.2024.116776
{"title":"黄芩的化学成分和功能分析比较:使用超高效液相色谱-q-orbitrap MS/MS 进行黄芩精煮粉末与传统煎药片的比较","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.lwt.2024.116776","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study aimed to investigate the potential benefits of using precise boiling techniques on the solubility of two forms of <em>Scutellaria baicalensis</em> (<em>S. baicalensis</em>) powder, <em>Scutellaria</em> precision-boiled powder (SPBP) and <em>Scutellaria</em> traditional decoction pieces (STDP), using UHPLC-Q-Orbitrap MS/MS technology. The UHPLC-Q-Orbitrap MS/MS technique, along with data-analysis methodologies, were employed to compare the active components between SPBP and STDP. A total of ninety-three chemical components were detected in <em>S. baicalensis</em>. By comparing the weights of extracts, conducting a weighted analysis, and using network pharmacology, SPBP demonstrated a higher concentration of active components and improved beneficial benefits compared to STDP. The quality and potential effectiveness of SPBP were evaluated by comparing its chemical components with those of STDP. These findings lay a foundational framework for in-depth exploration of the mechanisms underlying the decoction of <em>S. baicalensis</em> powder, offering significant potential for future research in functional foods and nutraceuticals.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":382,"journal":{"name":"LWT - Food Science and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0023643824010570/pdfft?md5=86574b56ba360f3a1d11eaefd0047d4b&pid=1-s2.0-S0023643824010570-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative chemical profiling and functional analysis of Scutellaria baicalensis: Precision-boiled powder vs. traditional decoction pieces using UHPLC-q-orbitrap MS/MS\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lwt.2024.116776\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study aimed to investigate the potential benefits of using precise boiling techniques on the solubility of two forms of <em>Scutellaria baicalensis</em> (<em>S. baicalensis</em>) powder, <em>Scutellaria</em> precision-boiled powder (SPBP) and <em>Scutellaria</em> traditional decoction pieces (STDP), using UHPLC-Q-Orbitrap MS/MS technology. The UHPLC-Q-Orbitrap MS/MS technique, along with data-analysis methodologies, were employed to compare the active components between SPBP and STDP. A total of ninety-three chemical components were detected in <em>S. baicalensis</em>. By comparing the weights of extracts, conducting a weighted analysis, and using network pharmacology, SPBP demonstrated a higher concentration of active components and improved beneficial benefits compared to STDP. The quality and potential effectiveness of SPBP were evaluated by comparing its chemical components with those of STDP. These findings lay a foundational framework for in-depth exploration of the mechanisms underlying the decoction of <em>S. baicalensis</em> powder, offering significant potential for future research in functional foods and nutraceuticals.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":382,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LWT - Food Science and Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0023643824010570/pdfft?md5=86574b56ba360f3a1d11eaefd0047d4b&pid=1-s2.0-S0023643824010570-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LWT - Food Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0023643824010570\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LWT - Food Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0023643824010570","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在利用超高效液相色谱-Q-轨道阱质谱/质谱(UHPLC-Q-Orbitrap MS/MS)技术,研究精煮技术对两种黄芩粉(黄芩精煮粉(SPBP)和黄芩传统煎煮片(STDP))溶解度的潜在益处。采用 UHPLC-Q-Orbitrap MS/MS 技术和数据分析方法比较了 SPBP 和 STDP 的有效成分。在黄芩中总共检测到 93 种化学成分。通过比较提取物的重量、进行加权分析和使用网络药理学,与 STDP 相比,SPBP 表现出更高的活性成分浓度和更好的益处。通过比较 SPBP 与 STDP 的化学成分,评估了 SPBP 的质量和潜在功效。这些发现为深入探索黄芩粉的煎煮机制奠定了基础框架,为功能食品和营养保健品的未来研究提供了巨大潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative chemical profiling and functional analysis of Scutellaria baicalensis: Precision-boiled powder vs. traditional decoction pieces using UHPLC-q-orbitrap MS/MS

This study aimed to investigate the potential benefits of using precise boiling techniques on the solubility of two forms of Scutellaria baicalensis (S. baicalensis) powder, Scutellaria precision-boiled powder (SPBP) and Scutellaria traditional decoction pieces (STDP), using UHPLC-Q-Orbitrap MS/MS technology. The UHPLC-Q-Orbitrap MS/MS technique, along with data-analysis methodologies, were employed to compare the active components between SPBP and STDP. A total of ninety-three chemical components were detected in S. baicalensis. By comparing the weights of extracts, conducting a weighted analysis, and using network pharmacology, SPBP demonstrated a higher concentration of active components and improved beneficial benefits compared to STDP. The quality and potential effectiveness of SPBP were evaluated by comparing its chemical components with those of STDP. These findings lay a foundational framework for in-depth exploration of the mechanisms underlying the decoction of S. baicalensis powder, offering significant potential for future research in functional foods and nutraceuticals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
LWT - Food Science and Technology
LWT - Food Science and Technology 工程技术-食品科技
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
1724
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: LWT - Food Science and Technology is an international journal that publishes innovative papers in the fields of food chemistry, biochemistry, microbiology, technology and nutrition. The work described should be innovative either in the approach or in the methods used. The significance of the results either for the science community or for the food industry must also be specified. Contributions written in English are welcomed in the form of review articles, short reviews, research papers, and research notes. Papers featuring animal trials and cell cultures are outside the scope of the journal and will not be considered for publication.
期刊最新文献
Advanced detection of foreign objects in fresh-cut vegetables using YOLOv5 Effects of compound fermentation of lactic acid bacteria IMAUJBP3 and IMAUJBR3 on the characteristic flavors and metabolites of mutton fermented sausages Stability and release kinetics of nanoliposomes containing bitter melon fruit extract at different temperatures and pH values, and in simulated gastrointestinal conditions Optimization of ultrasound-assisted extraction of astaxanthin from black tiger shrimp (Penaeus monodon) shells using deep eutectic solvent and ethanol as a co-solvent Comparison of ultrasound and high-pressure homogenization emulsification: A promising fabrication strategy for total nutritional double emulsion-based product enriched with low-molecular-weight oyster peptides
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1