Rita Moura , Dulce A. Oliveira , Marco P.L. Parente , Nina Kimmich , Luděk Hynčík , Lucie H. Hympánová , Renato M. Natal Jorge
{"title":"预测阴道分娩过程中盆底动态的患者特异性替代模型","authors":"Rita Moura , Dulce A. Oliveira , Marco P.L. Parente , Nina Kimmich , Luděk Hynčík , Lucie H. Hympánová , Renato M. Natal Jorge","doi":"10.1016/j.jmbbm.2024.106736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Childbirth is a challenging event that can lead to long-term consequences such as prolapse or incontinence. While computational models are widely used to mimic vaginal delivery, their integration into clinical practice is hindered by time constraints. The primary goal of this study is to introduce an artificial intelligence pipeline that leverages patient-specific surrogate modeling to predict pelvic floor injuries during vaginal delivery. A finite element-based machine learning approach was implemented to generate a dataset with information from finite element simulations. Thousands of childbirth simulations were conducted, varying the dimensions of the pelvic floor muscles and the mechanical properties used for their characterization. Additionally, a mesh morphing algorithm was developed to obtain patient-specific models. Machine learning models, specifically tree-based algorithms such as Random Forest (RF) and Extreme Gradient Boosting, as well as Artificial Neural Networks, were trained to predict the nodal coordinates of nodes within the pelvic floor, aiming to predict the muscle stretch during a critical interval. The results indicate that the RF model performs best, with a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.086 mm and a mean absolute percentage error of 0.38%. Overall, more than 80% of the nodes have an error smaller than 0.1 mm. The MAE for the calculated stretch is equal to 0.0011. The implemented pipeline allows loading the trained model and making predictions in less than 11 s. This work demonstrates the feasibility of implementing a machine learning framework in clinical practice to predict potential maternal injuries and assist in medical-decision making.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":380,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials","volume":"160 ","pages":"Article 106736"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751616124003680/pdfft?md5=18db24375ec240fe21dbc2ce80d7caa1&pid=1-s2.0-S1751616124003680-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient-specific surrogate model to predict pelvic floor dynamics during vaginal delivery\",\"authors\":\"Rita Moura , Dulce A. Oliveira , Marco P.L. Parente , Nina Kimmich , Luděk Hynčík , Lucie H. Hympánová , Renato M. Natal Jorge\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jmbbm.2024.106736\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Childbirth is a challenging event that can lead to long-term consequences such as prolapse or incontinence. While computational models are widely used to mimic vaginal delivery, their integration into clinical practice is hindered by time constraints. The primary goal of this study is to introduce an artificial intelligence pipeline that leverages patient-specific surrogate modeling to predict pelvic floor injuries during vaginal delivery. A finite element-based machine learning approach was implemented to generate a dataset with information from finite element simulations. Thousands of childbirth simulations were conducted, varying the dimensions of the pelvic floor muscles and the mechanical properties used for their characterization. Additionally, a mesh morphing algorithm was developed to obtain patient-specific models. Machine learning models, specifically tree-based algorithms such as Random Forest (RF) and Extreme Gradient Boosting, as well as Artificial Neural Networks, were trained to predict the nodal coordinates of nodes within the pelvic floor, aiming to predict the muscle stretch during a critical interval. The results indicate that the RF model performs best, with a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.086 mm and a mean absolute percentage error of 0.38%. Overall, more than 80% of the nodes have an error smaller than 0.1 mm. The MAE for the calculated stretch is equal to 0.0011. The implemented pipeline allows loading the trained model and making predictions in less than 11 s. This work demonstrates the feasibility of implementing a machine learning framework in clinical practice to predict potential maternal injuries and assist in medical-decision making.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":380,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials\",\"volume\":\"160 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106736\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751616124003680/pdfft?md5=18db24375ec240fe21dbc2ce80d7caa1&pid=1-s2.0-S1751616124003680-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751616124003680\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751616124003680","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Patient-specific surrogate model to predict pelvic floor dynamics during vaginal delivery
Childbirth is a challenging event that can lead to long-term consequences such as prolapse or incontinence. While computational models are widely used to mimic vaginal delivery, their integration into clinical practice is hindered by time constraints. The primary goal of this study is to introduce an artificial intelligence pipeline that leverages patient-specific surrogate modeling to predict pelvic floor injuries during vaginal delivery. A finite element-based machine learning approach was implemented to generate a dataset with information from finite element simulations. Thousands of childbirth simulations were conducted, varying the dimensions of the pelvic floor muscles and the mechanical properties used for their characterization. Additionally, a mesh morphing algorithm was developed to obtain patient-specific models. Machine learning models, specifically tree-based algorithms such as Random Forest (RF) and Extreme Gradient Boosting, as well as Artificial Neural Networks, were trained to predict the nodal coordinates of nodes within the pelvic floor, aiming to predict the muscle stretch during a critical interval. The results indicate that the RF model performs best, with a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.086 mm and a mean absolute percentage error of 0.38%. Overall, more than 80% of the nodes have an error smaller than 0.1 mm. The MAE for the calculated stretch is equal to 0.0011. The implemented pipeline allows loading the trained model and making predictions in less than 11 s. This work demonstrates the feasibility of implementing a machine learning framework in clinical practice to predict potential maternal injuries and assist in medical-decision making.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials is concerned with the mechanical deformation, damage and failure under applied forces, of biological material (at the tissue, cellular and molecular levels) and of biomaterials, i.e. those materials which are designed to mimic or replace biological materials.
The primary focus of the journal is the synthesis of materials science, biology, and medical and dental science. Reports of fundamental scientific investigations are welcome, as are articles concerned with the practical application of materials in medical devices. Both experimental and theoretical work is of interest; theoretical papers will normally include comparison of predictions with experimental data, though we recognize that this may not always be appropriate. The journal also publishes technical notes concerned with emerging experimental or theoretical techniques, letters to the editor and, by invitation, review articles and papers describing existing techniques for the benefit of an interdisciplinary readership.