{"title":"Al/Cr-Kα X 射线光发射仪器的强度-能量响应函数:实验室间研究","authors":"David Alamarguy , Damien Aureau , Thierry Conard , Nicolas Gauthier , Frédéric Georgi , Stéphane Guilet , Samar Hajjar-Garreau , Olivier Heintz , Guillaume Monier , Christophe Méthivier , Hervé Montigaud , Samantha Soulé , Olivier Renault , Rémi Lazzari","doi":"10.1016/j.elspec.2024.147486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The question of the intensity-energy response of photoemission spectrometers has been approached through a round-robin involving 13 instruments working with low (Al/Mg-K<span><math><mi>α</mi></math></span>) and high (Cr-K<span><math><mi>α</mi></math></span>) energy photon sources. An algorithm based on the analysis of inelastic background previously proposed [S. Guilet et al., J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 285 (2022) 147225)] was intensively tested against calibrated Al/Mg-K<span><math><mi>α</mi></math></span> instruments and calculated relative sensitivity factors (RSFs) over the 15 core level peaks of coinage metals (Ag, Au, Cu). In both cases, the linear correlation within <span><math><mrow><mo>±</mo><mn>10</mn></mrow></math></span> %, over two orders of magnitude in intensity and for kinetic energies ranging from <span><math><mrow><mo>∼</mo><mn>400</mn></mrow></math></span> to <span><math><mrow><mspace></mspace><mn>1400</mn><mspace></mspace><mi>eV</mi></mrow></math></span>, showed the consistency of the approach. All the contributions to RSFs (<em>e.g.</em> non-dipolar terms in the photo-ionization cross section, elastic scattering effects, surface excitations, beam polarization by the monochromator) were critically reviewed and taken into account using the state-of-the-art modellings and databases. Strong variations were evidenced among instruments, regarding not only the response functions, but also the theoretical RSFs due to different measurement geometries. For the Cr-K<span><math><mi>α</mi></math></span> hard x-ray instruments, the same analysis was performed with a set of different materials (Al, Si, Ge, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Nb, Mo, Ag, W, Au). A <span><math><mrow><mo>±</mo><mn>10</mn></mrow></math></span> % satisfactory agreement against theoretical RSFs over 69 core levels spanning a large kinetic energy range (300–4000 eV) could be achieved with a common response function. Despite limitations that are reviewed, this work opens interesting perspectives for a systematic calibration of photoemission instruments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15726,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena","volume":"276 ","pages":"Article 147486"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intensity-energy response function of Al/Cr-Kα x-ray photoemission instruments: An inter-laboratory study\",\"authors\":\"David Alamarguy , Damien Aureau , Thierry Conard , Nicolas Gauthier , Frédéric Georgi , Stéphane Guilet , Samar Hajjar-Garreau , Olivier Heintz , Guillaume Monier , Christophe Méthivier , Hervé Montigaud , Samantha Soulé , Olivier Renault , Rémi Lazzari\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.elspec.2024.147486\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The question of the intensity-energy response of photoemission spectrometers has been approached through a round-robin involving 13 instruments working with low (Al/Mg-K<span><math><mi>α</mi></math></span>) and high (Cr-K<span><math><mi>α</mi></math></span>) energy photon sources. An algorithm based on the analysis of inelastic background previously proposed [S. Guilet et al., J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 285 (2022) 147225)] was intensively tested against calibrated Al/Mg-K<span><math><mi>α</mi></math></span> instruments and calculated relative sensitivity factors (RSFs) over the 15 core level peaks of coinage metals (Ag, Au, Cu). In both cases, the linear correlation within <span><math><mrow><mo>±</mo><mn>10</mn></mrow></math></span> %, over two orders of magnitude in intensity and for kinetic energies ranging from <span><math><mrow><mo>∼</mo><mn>400</mn></mrow></math></span> to <span><math><mrow><mspace></mspace><mn>1400</mn><mspace></mspace><mi>eV</mi></mrow></math></span>, showed the consistency of the approach. All the contributions to RSFs (<em>e.g.</em> non-dipolar terms in the photo-ionization cross section, elastic scattering effects, surface excitations, beam polarization by the monochromator) were critically reviewed and taken into account using the state-of-the-art modellings and databases. Strong variations were evidenced among instruments, regarding not only the response functions, but also the theoretical RSFs due to different measurement geometries. For the Cr-K<span><math><mi>α</mi></math></span> hard x-ray instruments, the same analysis was performed with a set of different materials (Al, Si, Ge, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Nb, Mo, Ag, W, Au). A <span><math><mrow><mo>±</mo><mn>10</mn></mrow></math></span> % satisfactory agreement against theoretical RSFs over 69 core levels spanning a large kinetic energy range (300–4000 eV) could be achieved with a common response function. Despite limitations that are reviewed, this work opens interesting perspectives for a systematic calibration of photoemission instruments.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15726,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena\",\"volume\":\"276 \",\"pages\":\"Article 147486\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0368204824000690\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPECTROSCOPY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0368204824000690","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPECTROSCOPY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Intensity-energy response function of Al/Cr-Kα x-ray photoemission instruments: An inter-laboratory study
The question of the intensity-energy response of photoemission spectrometers has been approached through a round-robin involving 13 instruments working with low (Al/Mg-K) and high (Cr-K) energy photon sources. An algorithm based on the analysis of inelastic background previously proposed [S. Guilet et al., J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 285 (2022) 147225)] was intensively tested against calibrated Al/Mg-K instruments and calculated relative sensitivity factors (RSFs) over the 15 core level peaks of coinage metals (Ag, Au, Cu). In both cases, the linear correlation within %, over two orders of magnitude in intensity and for kinetic energies ranging from to , showed the consistency of the approach. All the contributions to RSFs (e.g. non-dipolar terms in the photo-ionization cross section, elastic scattering effects, surface excitations, beam polarization by the monochromator) were critically reviewed and taken into account using the state-of-the-art modellings and databases. Strong variations were evidenced among instruments, regarding not only the response functions, but also the theoretical RSFs due to different measurement geometries. For the Cr-K hard x-ray instruments, the same analysis was performed with a set of different materials (Al, Si, Ge, Fe, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Nb, Mo, Ag, W, Au). A % satisfactory agreement against theoretical RSFs over 69 core levels spanning a large kinetic energy range (300–4000 eV) could be achieved with a common response function. Despite limitations that are reviewed, this work opens interesting perspectives for a systematic calibration of photoemission instruments.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena publishes experimental, theoretical and applied work in the field of electron spectroscopy and electronic structure, involving techniques which use high energy photons (>10 eV) or electrons as probes or detected particles in the investigation.