BRAF和MEK抑制剂对BRAF V600突变黑色素瘤患者的疗效比较☆。

G.K. In , K. Chen , G. Sajeev , R. Simpson , S. Kalia , D. Christensen , D. Liu , N. Rezai , A. di Pietro , J. Signorovitch
{"title":"BRAF和MEK抑制剂对BRAF V600突变黑色素瘤患者的疗效比较☆。","authors":"G.K. In ,&nbsp;K. Chen ,&nbsp;G. Sajeev ,&nbsp;R. Simpson ,&nbsp;S. Kalia ,&nbsp;D. Christensen ,&nbsp;D. Liu ,&nbsp;N. Rezai ,&nbsp;A. di Pietro ,&nbsp;J. Signorovitch","doi":"10.1016/j.esmorw.2024.100071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Understanding of comparative efficacy of treatments can inform clinical decision-making. This study compared overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) across patients with metastatic BRAFV600-mutant melanoma initiating encorafenib + binimetinib (ENCO + BINI), dabrafenib + trametinib (DAB + TRAM), and vemurafenib + cobimetinib (VEM + COBI).</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>In this hybrid study, we contextualized OS and PFS between patients with metastatic BRAF V600E/K-mutant melanoma receiving ENCO + BINI in the phase III COLUMBUS trial (enrollment: December 2013 to April 2015) versus real-world data (RWD) from a nationwide electronic health record-derived deidentified database (treatment initiation: 2014-2021). After observing consistent outcomes across trial and RWD, we compared OS and PFS for a pooled ENCO + BINI cohort across these settings versus comparable DAB + TRAM and VEM + COBI cohorts from the real-world database.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 716 patients [ENCO + BINI (<em>n</em> = 275; <em>n</em> = 192 from COLUMBUS, <em>n</em> = 83 from RWD), DAB + TRAM (<em>n</em> = 387), VEM + COBI (<em>n</em> = 54)], mean age was 56-60 years. OS and PFS were similar for ENCO + BINI-treated patients in COLUMBUS and RWD [adjusted hazard ratios: 1.03 (95% CI 0.62-1.72) for OS, 1.10 (0.69-1.75) for PFS]. Relative to the pooled ENCO + BINI group, adjusted OS and PFS were significantly worse for DAB + TRAM [OS: 1.32 (1.05-1.65), PFS: 1.49 (1.20-1.87)] and comparable for VEM + COBI [OS: 1.17 (0.76-1.79), PFS: 1.20 (0.79-1.82)]. Results were similar in comparisons based on the RWD groups alone, when trial data were excluded.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>OS and PFS were longer with ENCO + BINI relative to DAB + TRAM and comparable to VEM + COBI, after adjusting for differences in patient profiles. These findings add to evidence informing the use of combination v-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B protein (BRAF)/mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitors in metastatic BRAF V600-mutant melanoma.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100491,"journal":{"name":"ESMO Real World Data and Digital Oncology","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100071"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949820124000493/pdfft?md5=515da39c8107032de596189f1dab29b3&pid=1-s2.0-S2949820124000493-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative effectiveness among BRAF plus MEK inhibitors for patients with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma☆\",\"authors\":\"G.K. In ,&nbsp;K. Chen ,&nbsp;G. Sajeev ,&nbsp;R. Simpson ,&nbsp;S. Kalia ,&nbsp;D. Christensen ,&nbsp;D. Liu ,&nbsp;N. Rezai ,&nbsp;A. di Pietro ,&nbsp;J. Signorovitch\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.esmorw.2024.100071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Understanding of comparative efficacy of treatments can inform clinical decision-making. This study compared overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) across patients with metastatic BRAFV600-mutant melanoma initiating encorafenib + binimetinib (ENCO + BINI), dabrafenib + trametinib (DAB + TRAM), and vemurafenib + cobimetinib (VEM + COBI).</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>In this hybrid study, we contextualized OS and PFS between patients with metastatic BRAF V600E/K-mutant melanoma receiving ENCO + BINI in the phase III COLUMBUS trial (enrollment: December 2013 to April 2015) versus real-world data (RWD) from a nationwide electronic health record-derived deidentified database (treatment initiation: 2014-2021). After observing consistent outcomes across trial and RWD, we compared OS and PFS for a pooled ENCO + BINI cohort across these settings versus comparable DAB + TRAM and VEM + COBI cohorts from the real-world database.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 716 patients [ENCO + BINI (<em>n</em> = 275; <em>n</em> = 192 from COLUMBUS, <em>n</em> = 83 from RWD), DAB + TRAM (<em>n</em> = 387), VEM + COBI (<em>n</em> = 54)], mean age was 56-60 years. OS and PFS were similar for ENCO + BINI-treated patients in COLUMBUS and RWD [adjusted hazard ratios: 1.03 (95% CI 0.62-1.72) for OS, 1.10 (0.69-1.75) for PFS]. Relative to the pooled ENCO + BINI group, adjusted OS and PFS were significantly worse for DAB + TRAM [OS: 1.32 (1.05-1.65), PFS: 1.49 (1.20-1.87)] and comparable for VEM + COBI [OS: 1.17 (0.76-1.79), PFS: 1.20 (0.79-1.82)]. Results were similar in comparisons based on the RWD groups alone, when trial data were excluded.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>OS and PFS were longer with ENCO + BINI relative to DAB + TRAM and comparable to VEM + COBI, after adjusting for differences in patient profiles. These findings add to evidence informing the use of combination v-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B protein (BRAF)/mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitors in metastatic BRAF V600-mutant melanoma.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100491,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ESMO Real World Data and Digital Oncology\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100071\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949820124000493/pdfft?md5=515da39c8107032de596189f1dab29b3&pid=1-s2.0-S2949820124000493-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ESMO Real World Data and Digital Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949820124000493\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESMO Real World Data and Digital Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949820124000493","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景了解治疗方法的比较疗效可为临床决策提供依据。本研究比较了转移性BRAFV600突变黑色素瘤患者开始接受安戈非尼+比尼替尼(ENCO+BINI)、达拉非尼+曲美替尼(DAB+TRAM)和维莫非尼+氯贝替尼(VEM+COBI)治疗后的总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)。材料与方法在这项混合研究中,我们将在 COLUMBUS III 期试验(入组时间:2013 年 12 月至 2015 年 4 月)中接受 ENCO + BINI 治疗的转移性 BRAF V600E/K 突变黑色素瘤患者的 OS 和 PFS 与来自全国范围内电子健康记录衍生的去识别数据库的真实世界数据(RWD)(治疗开始时间:2014-2021 年)进行了对比。在观察到试验和 RWD 的一致结果后,我们比较了在这些情况下汇总的 ENCO + BINI 队列与真实世界数据库中可比的 DAB + TRAM 和 VEM + COBI 队列的 OS 和 PFS。结果在 716 名患者中[ENCO + BINI(n = 275;n = 192 来自 COLUMBUS,n = 83 来自 RWD),DAB + TRAM(n = 387),VEM + COBI(n = 54)],平均年龄为 56-60 岁。COLUMBUS 和 RWD 的 ENCO + BINI 治疗患者的 OS 和 PFS 相似[调整后危险比为 1.03(95% CI)]:OS 为 1.03(95% CI 0.62-1.72),PFS 为 1.10(0.69-1.75)]。相对于ENCO + BINI组,DAB + TRAM的调整后OS和PFS明显更差[OS:1.32(1.05-1.65),PFS:1.49(1.20-1.87)],而VEM + COBI的调整后OS和PFS相当[OS:1.17(0.76-1.79),PFS:1.20(0.79-1.82)]。在排除试验数据后,仅基于RWD组的比较结果与之相似。结论在调整患者资料的差异后,ENCO + BINI的OS和PFS长于DAB + TRAM,与VEM + COBI相当。这些发现为在转移性BRAF V600突变黑色素瘤中联合使用v-Raf小鼠肉瘤病毒癌基因同源物B蛋白(BRAF)/介原激活蛋白激酶激酶(MEK)抑制剂提供了更多证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative effectiveness among BRAF plus MEK inhibitors for patients with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma☆

Background

Understanding of comparative efficacy of treatments can inform clinical decision-making. This study compared overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) across patients with metastatic BRAFV600-mutant melanoma initiating encorafenib + binimetinib (ENCO + BINI), dabrafenib + trametinib (DAB + TRAM), and vemurafenib + cobimetinib (VEM + COBI).

Materials and methods

In this hybrid study, we contextualized OS and PFS between patients with metastatic BRAF V600E/K-mutant melanoma receiving ENCO + BINI in the phase III COLUMBUS trial (enrollment: December 2013 to April 2015) versus real-world data (RWD) from a nationwide electronic health record-derived deidentified database (treatment initiation: 2014-2021). After observing consistent outcomes across trial and RWD, we compared OS and PFS for a pooled ENCO + BINI cohort across these settings versus comparable DAB + TRAM and VEM + COBI cohorts from the real-world database.

Results

Of 716 patients [ENCO + BINI (n = 275; n = 192 from COLUMBUS, n = 83 from RWD), DAB + TRAM (n = 387), VEM + COBI (n = 54)], mean age was 56-60 years. OS and PFS were similar for ENCO + BINI-treated patients in COLUMBUS and RWD [adjusted hazard ratios: 1.03 (95% CI 0.62-1.72) for OS, 1.10 (0.69-1.75) for PFS]. Relative to the pooled ENCO + BINI group, adjusted OS and PFS were significantly worse for DAB + TRAM [OS: 1.32 (1.05-1.65), PFS: 1.49 (1.20-1.87)] and comparable for VEM + COBI [OS: 1.17 (0.76-1.79), PFS: 1.20 (0.79-1.82)]. Results were similar in comparisons based on the RWD groups alone, when trial data were excluded.

Conclusions

OS and PFS were longer with ENCO + BINI relative to DAB + TRAM and comparable to VEM + COBI, after adjusting for differences in patient profiles. These findings add to evidence informing the use of combination v-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B protein (BRAF)/mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitors in metastatic BRAF V600-mutant melanoma.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Utility of automated data transfer for cancer clinical trials and considerations for implementation Characterisation of oncology EHR-derived real-world data in the UK, Germany, and Japan Evolving treatment patterns and outcomes among patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma post-avelumab maintenance approval: insights from The US Oncology Network Collaborating across sectors in service of open science, precision oncology, and patients: an overview of the AACR Project GENIE (Genomics Evidence Neoplasia Information Exchange) Biopharma Collaborative (BPC) Data analytics for real-world data integration in TKI-treated NSCLC patients using electronic health records
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1