探索护士导师的工作雕琢:关于学生指导过程中护理遗漏的纵向研究

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Nurse Education in Practice Pub Date : 2024-09-12 DOI:10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104143
{"title":"探索护士导师的工作雕琢:关于学生指导过程中护理遗漏的纵向研究","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To compare the job crafting strategies nurse mentors use when mentoring students versus during periods of respite and to assess the effectiveness of these strategies in reducing instances of missed nursing care (MNC).</p></div><div><h3>Background</h3><p>Nurses who serve as mentors may have to train a group of nursing students on top of their routine nursing duties. The corresponding high workloads and limited resources may force them to decide which nursing care to delay or omit (i.e., MNC). The mentors’ initiative and the actions they take to address the multiple job requirements which do not align with the organization's resources are referred to as job crafting strategies. Mentors can use these strategies to shape their role as nurses as well as their role as mentors, depending on their motives and personality.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A longitudinal study with data collected at two time points.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>One hundred nurse mentors completed validated questionnaires assessing job crafting strategies, MNC and work overload while actively mentoring students. Eighty returned for a follow-up during a non-mentoring period three months later. Data analysis included paired t-tests and hierarchical multivariable linear regressions.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>No significant differences were found in MNC between the two points (1.83 SD 0.6 vs. 1.82 SD 0.75; p=0.942). A decrease in hindering demands was noted during active mentoring compared with respite (2.6 SD 0.97 vs. 2.84 SD 0.96; p=0.038). Enhancing structural job resources was significantly negatively correlated with MNC during active mentoring, while enhancing challenging job demands was positively correlated with MNC during these periods (β=0.48, p=0.18 and β=-0.35, p=0.014, respectively).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Nurse mentors can effectively reduce MNC by focusing on enhancing structural resources and limiting challenging demands during mentoring periods. It is essential for healthcare organizations to support nurse mentors with manageable workloads and necessary resources to maintain high-quality care.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48715,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education in Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring nurse mentors' job crafting: A longitudinal study on missed nursing care across student supervision\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104143\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To compare the job crafting strategies nurse mentors use when mentoring students versus during periods of respite and to assess the effectiveness of these strategies in reducing instances of missed nursing care (MNC).</p></div><div><h3>Background</h3><p>Nurses who serve as mentors may have to train a group of nursing students on top of their routine nursing duties. The corresponding high workloads and limited resources may force them to decide which nursing care to delay or omit (i.e., MNC). The mentors’ initiative and the actions they take to address the multiple job requirements which do not align with the organization's resources are referred to as job crafting strategies. Mentors can use these strategies to shape their role as nurses as well as their role as mentors, depending on their motives and personality.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A longitudinal study with data collected at two time points.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>One hundred nurse mentors completed validated questionnaires assessing job crafting strategies, MNC and work overload while actively mentoring students. Eighty returned for a follow-up during a non-mentoring period three months later. Data analysis included paired t-tests and hierarchical multivariable linear regressions.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>No significant differences were found in MNC between the two points (1.83 SD 0.6 vs. 1.82 SD 0.75; p=0.942). A decrease in hindering demands was noted during active mentoring compared with respite (2.6 SD 0.97 vs. 2.84 SD 0.96; p=0.038). Enhancing structural job resources was significantly negatively correlated with MNC during active mentoring, while enhancing challenging job demands was positively correlated with MNC during these periods (β=0.48, p=0.18 and β=-0.35, p=0.014, respectively).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Nurse mentors can effectively reduce MNC by focusing on enhancing structural resources and limiting challenging demands during mentoring periods. It is essential for healthcare organizations to support nurse mentors with manageable workloads and necessary resources to maintain high-quality care.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48715,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nurse Education in Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nurse Education in Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471595324002725\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471595324002725","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较护士导师在指导学生时和休养期间所使用的工作精心设计策略,并评估这些策略在减少护理遗漏(MNC)方面的效果。 背景担任导师的护士可能需要在日常护理工作之外培训一批护理学生。相应的高工作量和有限的资源可能迫使她们决定推迟或省略哪些护理(即 MNC)。导师为解决与组织资源不符的多重工作要求而采取的主动性和行动被称为工作精心设计策略。指导者可以根据自己的动机和个性,利用这些策略来塑造自己作为护士的角色以及作为指导者的角色。方法 100 名护士指导者在积极指导学生的同时,完成了评估工作精心设计策略、MNC 和工作超负荷的有效问卷。三个月后,80 名辅导员在非辅导期间返回进行随访。数据分析包括配对 t 检验和分层多变量线性回归。结果 两点之间的 MNC 没有发现显著差异(1.83 SD 0.6 vs. 1.82 SD 0.75;p=0.942)。在积极指导期间,阻碍性需求比暂缓指导期间有所减少(2.6 SD 0.97 vs. 2.84 SD 0.96; p=0.038)。在积极指导期间,增强结构性工作资源与 MNC 呈显著负相关,而在这些期间,增强挑战性工作需求与 MNC 呈正相关(分别为 β=0.48,p=0.18 和 β=-0.35,p=0.014)。医疗机构必须为护士导师提供可控的工作量和必要的资源,以维持高质量的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Exploring nurse mentors' job crafting: A longitudinal study on missed nursing care across student supervision

Aim

To compare the job crafting strategies nurse mentors use when mentoring students versus during periods of respite and to assess the effectiveness of these strategies in reducing instances of missed nursing care (MNC).

Background

Nurses who serve as mentors may have to train a group of nursing students on top of their routine nursing duties. The corresponding high workloads and limited resources may force them to decide which nursing care to delay or omit (i.e., MNC). The mentors’ initiative and the actions they take to address the multiple job requirements which do not align with the organization's resources are referred to as job crafting strategies. Mentors can use these strategies to shape their role as nurses as well as their role as mentors, depending on their motives and personality.

Design

A longitudinal study with data collected at two time points.

Methods

One hundred nurse mentors completed validated questionnaires assessing job crafting strategies, MNC and work overload while actively mentoring students. Eighty returned for a follow-up during a non-mentoring period three months later. Data analysis included paired t-tests and hierarchical multivariable linear regressions.

Results

No significant differences were found in MNC between the two points (1.83 SD 0.6 vs. 1.82 SD 0.75; p=0.942). A decrease in hindering demands was noted during active mentoring compared with respite (2.6 SD 0.97 vs. 2.84 SD 0.96; p=0.038). Enhancing structural job resources was significantly negatively correlated with MNC during active mentoring, while enhancing challenging job demands was positively correlated with MNC during these periods (β=0.48, p=0.18 and β=-0.35, p=0.014, respectively).

Conclusion

Nurse mentors can effectively reduce MNC by focusing on enhancing structural resources and limiting challenging demands during mentoring periods. It is essential for healthcare organizations to support nurse mentors with manageable workloads and necessary resources to maintain high-quality care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
9.40%
发文量
180
审稿时长
51 days
期刊介绍: Nurse Education in Practice enables lecturers and practitioners to both share and disseminate evidence that demonstrates the actual practice of education as it is experienced in the realities of their respective work environments. It is supportive of new authors and will be at the forefront in publishing individual and collaborative papers that demonstrate the link between education and practice.
期刊最新文献
“Removing the home court advantage”: A qualitative evaluation of LEGO® as an interprofessional simulation icebreaker for midwifery and medical students Does being involved in a research project enhance the postgraduate taught student experience: A qualitative research case study Investigating clinical decision-making in bleeding complications among nursing students: A longitudinal mixed-methods study Simulation as a method in a supervision course, experiences of midwives and specialist nurses: A qualitative study Characteristics of nursing educators' professional competency standards: A scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1