多年代土壤水分和作物产量变异性--社区土地模型 (CLM5) 案例研究

IF 4.4 2区 地球科学 Q1 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems Pub Date : 2024-09-17 DOI:10.1029/2023MS004023
Theresa Boas, Heye Bogena, Dongryeol Ryu, Andrew Western, Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen
{"title":"多年代土壤水分和作物产量变异性--社区土地模型 (CLM5) 案例研究","authors":"Theresa Boas,&nbsp;Heye Bogena,&nbsp;Dongryeol Ryu,&nbsp;Andrew Western,&nbsp;Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen","doi":"10.1029/2023MS004023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>While the impacts of climate change on global food security have been studied extensively, the capability of emerging tools that couple land surface processes and crop growth in reproducing inter-annual yield variability at regional scale remains to be tested rigorously. In this study, we analyzed the effects of weather variations between years (1999–2019) on regional crop productivity for two agriculturally managed regions with contrasting climate and cropping conditions: the German state of North Rhine-Westphalia (DE-NRW) and the Australian state of Victoria (AUS-VIC), using the latest version of the Community Land Model (CLM5) and the WFDE5 (WATCH Forcing Data methodology applied to ECMWF reanalysis version 5) reanalysis. Overall, the simulation results were able to reproduce the total annual crop yields of certain crops, while also capturing the differences in total yield magnitudes between the domains. However, the simulations showed limitations in correctly capturing inter-annual differences of crop yield compared to official yield records, which resulted in relatively low correlation coefficients between 0.07 and 0.39 in AUS-VIC and between 0.11 and 0.42 in DE-NRW. The mean absolute deviation of simulated winter wheat yields was up to 4.6 times lower compared to state-wide records from 1999 to 2019. Our results suggest the following limitations of CLM5: (a) limitations in simulating yield responses from plant hydraulic stress; (b) errors in simulating soil moisture contents compared to satellite-derived data; and (c) errors in the representation of cropland in general, for example, crop parameterizations and human influences.</p>","PeriodicalId":14881,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2023MS004023","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-Decadal Soil Moisture and Crop Yield Variability—A Case Study With the Community Land Model (CLM5)\",\"authors\":\"Theresa Boas,&nbsp;Heye Bogena,&nbsp;Dongryeol Ryu,&nbsp;Andrew Western,&nbsp;Harrie-Jan Hendricks Franssen\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2023MS004023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>While the impacts of climate change on global food security have been studied extensively, the capability of emerging tools that couple land surface processes and crop growth in reproducing inter-annual yield variability at regional scale remains to be tested rigorously. In this study, we analyzed the effects of weather variations between years (1999–2019) on regional crop productivity for two agriculturally managed regions with contrasting climate and cropping conditions: the German state of North Rhine-Westphalia (DE-NRW) and the Australian state of Victoria (AUS-VIC), using the latest version of the Community Land Model (CLM5) and the WFDE5 (WATCH Forcing Data methodology applied to ECMWF reanalysis version 5) reanalysis. Overall, the simulation results were able to reproduce the total annual crop yields of certain crops, while also capturing the differences in total yield magnitudes between the domains. However, the simulations showed limitations in correctly capturing inter-annual differences of crop yield compared to official yield records, which resulted in relatively low correlation coefficients between 0.07 and 0.39 in AUS-VIC and between 0.11 and 0.42 in DE-NRW. The mean absolute deviation of simulated winter wheat yields was up to 4.6 times lower compared to state-wide records from 1999 to 2019. Our results suggest the following limitations of CLM5: (a) limitations in simulating yield responses from plant hydraulic stress; (b) errors in simulating soil moisture contents compared to satellite-derived data; and (c) errors in the representation of cropland in general, for example, crop parameterizations and human influences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14881,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2023MS004023\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2023MS004023\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2023MS004023","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然气候变化对全球粮食安全的影响已得到广泛研究,但将地表过程与作物生长结合起来的新兴工具在区域范围内再现年际产量变化的能力仍有待严格检验。在这项研究中,我们利用最新版本的社区土地模型(CLM5)和 WFDE5(WATCH Forcing Data methodology applied to ECMWF reanalysis version 5)再分析,分析了德国北莱茵-威斯特法伦州(DE-NRW)和澳大利亚维多利亚州(AUS-VIC)这两个气候和耕作条件截然不同的农业管理区的年际天气变化(1999-2019 年)对区域作物产量的影响。总体而言,模拟结果能够再现某些作物的年总产量,同时也能捕捉到不同区域总产量的差异。然而,与官方产量记录相比,模拟结果在正确捕捉作物产量的年际差异方面存在局限性,这导致相关系数相对较低,澳大利 亚-维多利亚州介于 0.07 和 0.39 之间,而德国-西北地区介于 0.11 和 0.42 之间。与 1999 年至 2019 年的全州记录相比,模拟冬小麦产量的平均绝对偏差最多低 4.6 倍。我们的结果表明 CLM5 存在以下局限性:(a)在模拟植物水力胁迫的产量响应方面存在局限性;(b)与卫星数据相比,在模拟土壤含水量方面存在误差;以及(c)在表示一般耕地方面存在误差,例如作物参数化和人为影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Multi-Decadal Soil Moisture and Crop Yield Variability—A Case Study With the Community Land Model (CLM5)

While the impacts of climate change on global food security have been studied extensively, the capability of emerging tools that couple land surface processes and crop growth in reproducing inter-annual yield variability at regional scale remains to be tested rigorously. In this study, we analyzed the effects of weather variations between years (1999–2019) on regional crop productivity for two agriculturally managed regions with contrasting climate and cropping conditions: the German state of North Rhine-Westphalia (DE-NRW) and the Australian state of Victoria (AUS-VIC), using the latest version of the Community Land Model (CLM5) and the WFDE5 (WATCH Forcing Data methodology applied to ECMWF reanalysis version 5) reanalysis. Overall, the simulation results were able to reproduce the total annual crop yields of certain crops, while also capturing the differences in total yield magnitudes between the domains. However, the simulations showed limitations in correctly capturing inter-annual differences of crop yield compared to official yield records, which resulted in relatively low correlation coefficients between 0.07 and 0.39 in AUS-VIC and between 0.11 and 0.42 in DE-NRW. The mean absolute deviation of simulated winter wheat yields was up to 4.6 times lower compared to state-wide records from 1999 to 2019. Our results suggest the following limitations of CLM5: (a) limitations in simulating yield responses from plant hydraulic stress; (b) errors in simulating soil moisture contents compared to satellite-derived data; and (c) errors in the representation of cropland in general, for example, crop parameterizations and human influences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES-
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
241
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems (JAMES) is committed to advancing the science of Earth systems modeling by offering high-quality scientific research through online availability and open access licensing. JAMES invites authors and readers from the international Earth systems modeling community. Open access. Articles are available free of charge for everyone with Internet access to view and download. Formal peer review. Supplemental material, such as code samples, images, and visualizations, is published at no additional charge. No additional charge for color figures. Modest page charges to cover production costs. Articles published in high-quality full text PDF, HTML, and XML. Internal and external reference linking, DOI registration, and forward linking via CrossRef.
期刊最新文献
A Lake Biogeochemistry Model for Global Methane Emissions: Model Development, Site-Level Validation, and Global Applicability Evaluation of Autoconversion Representation in E3SMv2 Using an Ensemble of Large-Eddy Simulations of Low-Level Warm Clouds Description and Evaluation of the CNRM-Cerfacs Climate Prediction System (C3PS) Generative Diffusion for Regional Surrogate Models From Sea-Ice Simulations Contributions of Irrigation Modeling, Soil Moisture and Snow Data Assimilation to High-Resolution Water Budget Estimates Over the Po Basin: Progress Towards Digital Replicas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1