利用治疗权重的反概率分析法分析喷射 COAG 模式对结直肠内镜黏膜下剥离术止血效果的影响

IF 1.4 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY DEN open Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI:10.1002/deo2.70008
Jun Kanazawa, Hisatomo Ikehara, Toshiki Horii, Gen Kitahara, Tomohiro Betto, Kaoru Yokoyama, Kiyonori Kobayashi, Chika Kusano
{"title":"利用治疗权重的反概率分析法分析喷射 COAG 模式对结直肠内镜黏膜下剥离术止血效果的影响","authors":"Jun Kanazawa,&nbsp;Hisatomo Ikehara,&nbsp;Toshiki Horii,&nbsp;Gen Kitahara,&nbsp;Tomohiro Betto,&nbsp;Kaoru Yokoyama,&nbsp;Kiyonori Kobayashi,&nbsp;Chika Kusano","doi":"10.1002/deo2.70008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Swift and forced COAG with an electrosurgical knife are commonly used for intraoperative hemostasis in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). If bleeding cannot be stopped using an electrosurgical knife, cauterization is attempted using hemostatic forceps. Since April 2022, our hospital has started using Spray COAG for intraoperative hemostasis for colorectal ESD. This study aimed to provide evidence of the efficacy of Spray COAG for intraoperative hemostasis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Colorectal ESD was performed for 320 lesions at our hospital. Of these, 307 were included; 145 and 162 lesions were operated before and after the introduction of Spray COAG, respectively. Spray COAG was used after the change. The primary endpoint was the change in the frequency of use of hemostatic forceps after the introduction of Spray COAG; the secondary endpoint was the change in the prevalence of postoperative complications after the introduction of Spray COAG. It should be noted that the Spray COAG mode was employed solely for hemostasis and not for dissection, while the Swift COAG mode was utilized for dissection in the After Spray COAG group. Statistical analysis was conducted using IPTW analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The frequency of use of hemostatic forceps was significantly decreased after the introduction of Spray COAG (odds ratio = 0.12, 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 0.06–0.23, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). The prevalence of post-ESD electrocoagulation syndrome significantly decreased (odds ratio = 0.43, 95%CI: 0.22–0.88, <i>p</i> = 0.02). No significant differences were observed between the intraoperative and postoperative perforations or rate of postoperative bleeding.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Spray COAG reduced the frequency of hemostatic forceps use in colorectal ESD.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":93973,"journal":{"name":"DEN open","volume":"5 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/deo2.70008","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of spray COAG mode on hemostasis in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection using inverse probability of treatment weight analysis\",\"authors\":\"Jun Kanazawa,&nbsp;Hisatomo Ikehara,&nbsp;Toshiki Horii,&nbsp;Gen Kitahara,&nbsp;Tomohiro Betto,&nbsp;Kaoru Yokoyama,&nbsp;Kiyonori Kobayashi,&nbsp;Chika Kusano\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/deo2.70008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>Swift and forced COAG with an electrosurgical knife are commonly used for intraoperative hemostasis in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). If bleeding cannot be stopped using an electrosurgical knife, cauterization is attempted using hemostatic forceps. Since April 2022, our hospital has started using Spray COAG for intraoperative hemostasis for colorectal ESD. This study aimed to provide evidence of the efficacy of Spray COAG for intraoperative hemostasis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Colorectal ESD was performed for 320 lesions at our hospital. Of these, 307 were included; 145 and 162 lesions were operated before and after the introduction of Spray COAG, respectively. Spray COAG was used after the change. The primary endpoint was the change in the frequency of use of hemostatic forceps after the introduction of Spray COAG; the secondary endpoint was the change in the prevalence of postoperative complications after the introduction of Spray COAG. It should be noted that the Spray COAG mode was employed solely for hemostasis and not for dissection, while the Swift COAG mode was utilized for dissection in the After Spray COAG group. Statistical analysis was conducted using IPTW analysis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The frequency of use of hemostatic forceps was significantly decreased after the introduction of Spray COAG (odds ratio = 0.12, 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 0.06–0.23, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). The prevalence of post-ESD electrocoagulation syndrome significantly decreased (odds ratio = 0.43, 95%CI: 0.22–0.88, <i>p</i> = 0.02). No significant differences were observed between the intraoperative and postoperative perforations or rate of postoperative bleeding.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Spray COAG reduced the frequency of hemostatic forceps use in colorectal ESD.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"DEN open\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/deo2.70008\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"DEN open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/deo2.70008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DEN open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/deo2.70008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在结直肠内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)中,通常使用电外科刀快速止血和强制 COAG 术进行术中止血。如果使用电刀无法止血,则尝试使用止血钳进行烧灼。自 2022 年 4 月起,我院开始使用喷雾式 COAG 用于结肠直肠镜下剥离术的术中止血。本研究旨在为 COAG 喷雾剂的术中止血效果提供证据。 方法 我院对 320 例病变进行了结直肠ESD。其中有 307 例病变在使用 COAG 喷雾剂之前和之后分别进行了 145 例和 162 例手术。改变后继续使用喷剂 COAG。主要终点是引入 COAG 喷雾剂后止血钳使用频率的变化;次要终点是引入 COAG 喷雾剂后术后并发症发生率的变化。值得注意的是,喷射 COAG 模式仅用于止血,不用于剥离,而喷射 COAG 后组使用 Swift COAG 模式进行剥离。统计分析采用 IPTW 分析法。 结果 使用喷雾式 COAG 后,止血钳的使用频率明显降低(几率比 = 0.12,95% 置信区间 [95%CI]:0.06-0.23,p < 0.001)。ESD术后电凝综合征的发生率明显下降(几率比=0.43,95%CI:0.22-0.88,P=0.02)。术中和术后穿孔率或术后出血率之间无明显差异。 结论 喷雾式 COAG 降低了结肠直肠ESD止血钳的使用频率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of spray COAG mode on hemostasis in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection using inverse probability of treatment weight analysis

Objective

Swift and forced COAG with an electrosurgical knife are commonly used for intraoperative hemostasis in colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). If bleeding cannot be stopped using an electrosurgical knife, cauterization is attempted using hemostatic forceps. Since April 2022, our hospital has started using Spray COAG for intraoperative hemostasis for colorectal ESD. This study aimed to provide evidence of the efficacy of Spray COAG for intraoperative hemostasis.

Methods

Colorectal ESD was performed for 320 lesions at our hospital. Of these, 307 were included; 145 and 162 lesions were operated before and after the introduction of Spray COAG, respectively. Spray COAG was used after the change. The primary endpoint was the change in the frequency of use of hemostatic forceps after the introduction of Spray COAG; the secondary endpoint was the change in the prevalence of postoperative complications after the introduction of Spray COAG. It should be noted that the Spray COAG mode was employed solely for hemostasis and not for dissection, while the Swift COAG mode was utilized for dissection in the After Spray COAG group. Statistical analysis was conducted using IPTW analysis.

Results

The frequency of use of hemostatic forceps was significantly decreased after the introduction of Spray COAG (odds ratio = 0.12, 95% confidence interval [95%CI]: 0.06–0.23, p < 0.001). The prevalence of post-ESD electrocoagulation syndrome significantly decreased (odds ratio = 0.43, 95%CI: 0.22–0.88, p = 0.02). No significant differences were observed between the intraoperative and postoperative perforations or rate of postoperative bleeding.

Conclusion

Spray COAG reduced the frequency of hemostatic forceps use in colorectal ESD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Difficult biliary cannulation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for distal malignant biliary obstruction caused by pancreatic cancer: An observational study Endoscopic risk factors to inform early detection of gastric cancer after Helicobacter pylori eradication: Meta-analysis and systematic review Proton pump inhibitor-induced large gastric polyps can regress within 2 months after discontinuation: Experience from two cases Multiple esophageal ulcers in a pediatric case of granulomatosis with polyangiitis: A case report Endoscopic features of gastric neuroendocrine tumors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1