持续监测茂密树木和灌木地区移除桉树后的植被和土壤恢复情况

IF 1.1 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ECOLOGY African Journal of Ecology Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI:10.1111/aje.13324
Sheunesu Ruwanza
{"title":"持续监测茂密树木和灌木地区移除桉树后的植被和土壤恢复情况","authors":"Sheunesu Ruwanza","doi":"10.1111/aje.13324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Invasion by invasive alien plants is a global challenge and South Africa has invested billions of Rands to manage invaders through the Working for Water programme. However, regular monitoring after alien plant clearing is hardly done, yet it forms the basis for assessing clearing programme effectiveness, particularly ecosystem recovery trajectories. I monitored both vegetation and soil recovery 6 years after <i>Eucalyptus grandis</i> clearing by Working for Water at Zvakanaka Farm in Limpopo Province of South Africa. Vegetation diversity and soil physical properties were surveyed in 2019 and re-surveyed in 2022 on fell-and-removal and fell-and-stackburn cleared treatments and compared to the nearby uninvaded treatment. Results show a significant increase in species richness in 2022 compared to 2019 in the fell-and-removal treatment. Cover of both native trees and shrubs as well as forbs was significantly higher in 2022 compared to 2019 in the fell-and-removal treatment compared to the fell-and-stackburn treatment. Most secondary invaders such as <i>Acacia mearnsii</i>, <i>E. cloeziana</i>, <i>Lantana camara</i> and <i>Rubus rigidus</i> that frequently occurred in 2019 showed decreased occurrence in 2022 on both cleared treatments. Between the two sampling years, soil compaction improved on the fell-and-removal treatment only, whereas hydraulic conductivity increased significantly in 2022 compared to 2019 in both the fell-and-removal and fell-and-stackburn treatments. Soils that were strongly and severely repellent in 2019 in the fell-and-stackburn treatment were becoming slightly repellent in 2022. These results show varied vegetation and soil improvements between 2019 and 2022 in both the fell-and-removal and fell-and-stackburn cleared treatments an indication that recovery is moving towards a positive vegetation and soil recovery trajectory in the direction of the uninvaded treatment. Recommendations for successful passive restoration such as secondary invasion follow-up clearing are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":7844,"journal":{"name":"African Journal of Ecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aje.13324","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Continuous Monitoring of Vegetation and Soil Recovery After Eucalyptus grandis Removal in Dense Trees and Shrubs Areas\",\"authors\":\"Sheunesu Ruwanza\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aje.13324\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Invasion by invasive alien plants is a global challenge and South Africa has invested billions of Rands to manage invaders through the Working for Water programme. However, regular monitoring after alien plant clearing is hardly done, yet it forms the basis for assessing clearing programme effectiveness, particularly ecosystem recovery trajectories. I monitored both vegetation and soil recovery 6 years after <i>Eucalyptus grandis</i> clearing by Working for Water at Zvakanaka Farm in Limpopo Province of South Africa. Vegetation diversity and soil physical properties were surveyed in 2019 and re-surveyed in 2022 on fell-and-removal and fell-and-stackburn cleared treatments and compared to the nearby uninvaded treatment. Results show a significant increase in species richness in 2022 compared to 2019 in the fell-and-removal treatment. Cover of both native trees and shrubs as well as forbs was significantly higher in 2022 compared to 2019 in the fell-and-removal treatment compared to the fell-and-stackburn treatment. Most secondary invaders such as <i>Acacia mearnsii</i>, <i>E. cloeziana</i>, <i>Lantana camara</i> and <i>Rubus rigidus</i> that frequently occurred in 2019 showed decreased occurrence in 2022 on both cleared treatments. Between the two sampling years, soil compaction improved on the fell-and-removal treatment only, whereas hydraulic conductivity increased significantly in 2022 compared to 2019 in both the fell-and-removal and fell-and-stackburn treatments. Soils that were strongly and severely repellent in 2019 in the fell-and-stackburn treatment were becoming slightly repellent in 2022. These results show varied vegetation and soil improvements between 2019 and 2022 in both the fell-and-removal and fell-and-stackburn cleared treatments an indication that recovery is moving towards a positive vegetation and soil recovery trajectory in the direction of the uninvaded treatment. Recommendations for successful passive restoration such as secondary invasion follow-up clearing are discussed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"African Journal of Ecology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aje.13324\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"African Journal of Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aje.13324\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journal of Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aje.13324","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

外来入侵植物的入侵是一项全球性挑战,南非已投资数十亿兰特,通过 "为水而努力 "计划来管理入侵者。然而,外来植物清除后的定期监测几乎没有进行过,但这却为评估清除计划的效果,尤其是生态系统恢复轨迹奠定了基础。我在南非林波波省的 Zvakanaka 农场监测了 "为水工作 "计划清除大桉树 6 年后的植被和土壤恢复情况。我于 2019 年调查了植被多样性和土壤物理性质,并于 2022 年再次调查了伐木-清除和伐木-秸秆清除处理,并与附近未清除处理进行了比较。结果显示,与 2019 年相比,2022 年伐除处理的物种丰富度明显增加。与 2019 年相比,2022 年伐木和移除处理中的本地乔木、灌木以及草本植物的覆盖率明显高于伐木和秸秆处理。2019 年经常出现的大多数次生入侵者,如相思树、E. cloeziana、Lantana camara 和 Rubus rigidus,2022 年在两种清除处理中的出现率都有所下降。在两个取样年之间,只有伐木-清除处理的土壤压实度有所改善,而伐木-清除处理和伐木-秸秆处理的导水率在 2022 年都比 2019 年显著增加。在伐木-移除法和伐木-秸秆法处理中,2019 年具有强烈和严重排斥性的土壤在 2022 年变得具有轻微排斥性。这些结果表明,在 2019 年至 2022 年期间,伐木清除处理和伐木焚烧处理中的植被和土壤都有不同程度的改善,这表明植被和土壤的恢复正朝着未受侵蚀处理的方向积极发展。本文讨论了成功进行被动恢复的建议,如二次入侵后续清理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Continuous Monitoring of Vegetation and Soil Recovery After Eucalyptus grandis Removal in Dense Trees and Shrubs Areas

Invasion by invasive alien plants is a global challenge and South Africa has invested billions of Rands to manage invaders through the Working for Water programme. However, regular monitoring after alien plant clearing is hardly done, yet it forms the basis for assessing clearing programme effectiveness, particularly ecosystem recovery trajectories. I monitored both vegetation and soil recovery 6 years after Eucalyptus grandis clearing by Working for Water at Zvakanaka Farm in Limpopo Province of South Africa. Vegetation diversity and soil physical properties were surveyed in 2019 and re-surveyed in 2022 on fell-and-removal and fell-and-stackburn cleared treatments and compared to the nearby uninvaded treatment. Results show a significant increase in species richness in 2022 compared to 2019 in the fell-and-removal treatment. Cover of both native trees and shrubs as well as forbs was significantly higher in 2022 compared to 2019 in the fell-and-removal treatment compared to the fell-and-stackburn treatment. Most secondary invaders such as Acacia mearnsii, E. cloeziana, Lantana camara and Rubus rigidus that frequently occurred in 2019 showed decreased occurrence in 2022 on both cleared treatments. Between the two sampling years, soil compaction improved on the fell-and-removal treatment only, whereas hydraulic conductivity increased significantly in 2022 compared to 2019 in both the fell-and-removal and fell-and-stackburn treatments. Soils that were strongly and severely repellent in 2019 in the fell-and-stackburn treatment were becoming slightly repellent in 2022. These results show varied vegetation and soil improvements between 2019 and 2022 in both the fell-and-removal and fell-and-stackburn cleared treatments an indication that recovery is moving towards a positive vegetation and soil recovery trajectory in the direction of the uninvaded treatment. Recommendations for successful passive restoration such as secondary invasion follow-up clearing are discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
African Journal of Ecology
African Journal of Ecology 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
134
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: African Journal of Ecology (formerly East African Wildlife Journal) publishes original scientific research into the ecology and conservation of the animals and plants of Africa. It has a wide circulation both within and outside Africa and is the foremost research journal on the ecology of the continent. In addition to original articles, the Journal publishes comprehensive reviews on topical subjects and brief communications of preliminary results.
期刊最新文献
Modelled Vegetation Structure and Abundance Confirms African Savannah Elephant-Induced Damage Across Space in a Dry Protected Area With Diverse Vegetation Vachellia xanthophloea, a New Native–Alien Tree Species Along the Orange River in Southern Namibia Mitochondrial Genetic Diversity and Demographic History of Critically Endangered Oreochromis karongae (Trewavas, 1941) Along Lake Nyasa, Tanzania The New Fishing Technique With Lighted Gillnets in Lake Kivu: Panacea or Pandora's Box? Importance of Heritage Structures as Bat Roosts in the Sahara Desert
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1