早产和足月死胎相关因素的差异:DESiGN试验的二级队列分析。

IF 4.7 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI:10.1111/1471-0528.17951
Chivon Winsloe, James Elhindi, Matias C. Vieira, Sophie Relph, Charles G. Arcus, Alessandro Alagna, Annette Briley, Mark Johnson, Louise M. Page, Andrew Shennan, Baskaran Thilaganathan, Neil Marlow, Christoph Lees, Deborah A. Lawlor, Asma Khalil, Jane Sandall, Andrew Copas, Dharmintra Pasupathy, the DESiGN Trial team
{"title":"早产和足月死胎相关因素的差异:DESiGN试验的二级队列分析。","authors":"Chivon Winsloe,&nbsp;James Elhindi,&nbsp;Matias C. Vieira,&nbsp;Sophie Relph,&nbsp;Charles G. Arcus,&nbsp;Alessandro Alagna,&nbsp;Annette Briley,&nbsp;Mark Johnson,&nbsp;Louise M. Page,&nbsp;Andrew Shennan,&nbsp;Baskaran Thilaganathan,&nbsp;Neil Marlow,&nbsp;Christoph Lees,&nbsp;Deborah A. Lawlor,&nbsp;Asma Khalil,&nbsp;Jane Sandall,&nbsp;Andrew Copas,&nbsp;Dharmintra Pasupathy,&nbsp;the DESiGN Trial team","doi":"10.1111/1471-0528.17951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To identify whether maternal and pregnancy characteristics associated with stillbirth differ between preterm and term stillbirth.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Secondary cohort analysis of the DESiGN RCT.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>Thirteen UK maternity units.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Population</h3>\n \n <p>Singleton pregnant women and their babies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Multiple logistic regression was used to assess whether the 12 factors explored were associated with stillbirth. Interaction tests assessed for a difference in these associations between the preterm and term periods.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Outcome Measure</h3>\n \n <p>Stillbirth stratified by preterm (&lt;37<sup>+0</sup> weeks') and term (37<sup>+0</sup>–42<sup>+6</sup> weeks') births.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 195 344 pregnancies were included. Six hundred and sixty-seven were stillborn (3.4 per 1000 births), of which 431 (65%) were preterm. Significant interactions were observed for maternal age, ethnicity, IMD, BMI, parity, smoking, PAPP-A, gestational hypertension, pre-eclampsia and gestational diabetes but not for chronic hypertension and pre-existing diabetes. Stronger associations with term stillbirth were observed in women with obesity compared to BMI 18.5–24.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (BMI 30.0–34.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup> term adjusted OR 2.1 [95% CI 1.4–3.0] vs. preterm aOR 1.1 [0.8–1.7]; BMI ≥ 35.0 kg/m<sup>2</sup> term aOR 2.2 [1.4–3.4] vs. preterm aOR 1.5 [1.2–1.8]; <i>p</i>-interaction &lt; 0.01), nulliparity compared to parity 1 (term aOR 1.7 [1.1–2.7] vs. preterm aOR 1.2 [0.9–1.6]; <i>p</i>-interaction &lt; 0.01) and Asian ethnicity compared with White (<i>p</i>-interaction &lt; 0.01). A weaker or lack of association with term, compared to preterm, stillbirth was observed for older maternal age, smoking and pre-eclampsia.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Differences in association exist between mothers experiencing preterm and term stillbirth. These differences could contribute to design of timely surveillance and interventions to further mitigate the risk of stillbirth.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50729,"journal":{"name":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"132 1","pages":"89-98"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1471-0528.17951","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in Factors Associated With Preterm and Term Stillbirth: A Secondary Cohort Analysis of the DESiGN Trial\",\"authors\":\"Chivon Winsloe,&nbsp;James Elhindi,&nbsp;Matias C. Vieira,&nbsp;Sophie Relph,&nbsp;Charles G. Arcus,&nbsp;Alessandro Alagna,&nbsp;Annette Briley,&nbsp;Mark Johnson,&nbsp;Louise M. Page,&nbsp;Andrew Shennan,&nbsp;Baskaran Thilaganathan,&nbsp;Neil Marlow,&nbsp;Christoph Lees,&nbsp;Deborah A. Lawlor,&nbsp;Asma Khalil,&nbsp;Jane Sandall,&nbsp;Andrew Copas,&nbsp;Dharmintra Pasupathy,&nbsp;the DESiGN Trial team\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1471-0528.17951\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>To identify whether maternal and pregnancy characteristics associated with stillbirth differ between preterm and term stillbirth.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Design</h3>\\n \\n <p>Secondary cohort analysis of the DESiGN RCT.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Setting</h3>\\n \\n <p>Thirteen UK maternity units.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Population</h3>\\n \\n <p>Singleton pregnant women and their babies.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Multiple logistic regression was used to assess whether the 12 factors explored were associated with stillbirth. Interaction tests assessed for a difference in these associations between the preterm and term periods.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Main Outcome Measure</h3>\\n \\n <p>Stillbirth stratified by preterm (&lt;37<sup>+0</sup> weeks') and term (37<sup>+0</sup>–42<sup>+6</sup> weeks') births.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 195 344 pregnancies were included. Six hundred and sixty-seven were stillborn (3.4 per 1000 births), of which 431 (65%) were preterm. Significant interactions were observed for maternal age, ethnicity, IMD, BMI, parity, smoking, PAPP-A, gestational hypertension, pre-eclampsia and gestational diabetes but not for chronic hypertension and pre-existing diabetes. Stronger associations with term stillbirth were observed in women with obesity compared to BMI 18.5–24.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup> (BMI 30.0–34.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup> term adjusted OR 2.1 [95% CI 1.4–3.0] vs. preterm aOR 1.1 [0.8–1.7]; BMI ≥ 35.0 kg/m<sup>2</sup> term aOR 2.2 [1.4–3.4] vs. preterm aOR 1.5 [1.2–1.8]; <i>p</i>-interaction &lt; 0.01), nulliparity compared to parity 1 (term aOR 1.7 [1.1–2.7] vs. preterm aOR 1.2 [0.9–1.6]; <i>p</i>-interaction &lt; 0.01) and Asian ethnicity compared with White (<i>p</i>-interaction &lt; 0.01). A weaker or lack of association with term, compared to preterm, stillbirth was observed for older maternal age, smoking and pre-eclampsia.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Differences in association exist between mothers experiencing preterm and term stillbirth. These differences could contribute to design of timely surveillance and interventions to further mitigate the risk of stillbirth.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology\",\"volume\":\"132 1\",\"pages\":\"89-98\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1471-0528.17951\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.17951\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bjog-An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.17951","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的确定与死胎相关的孕产妇和妊娠特征在早产和足月死胎之间是否存在差异.设计DESiGN RCT的二次队列分析.设置英国13家产科医院.人群足月孕妇及其婴儿.方法使用多重逻辑回归评估所探讨的12个因素是否与死胎相关。结果共纳入 195 344 名孕妇。有 667 例死胎(每 1000 例分娩中有 3.4 例),其中 431 例(65%)为早产儿。观察到产妇年龄、种族、IMD、体重指数、胎次、吸烟、PAPP-A、妊娠高血压、子痫前期和妊娠糖尿病之间存在显著的交互作用,但慢性高血压和原有糖尿病之间不存在交互作用。与 BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m2 相比,肥胖妇女与足月死胎的关系更密切(BMI 30.0-34.9 kg/m2 足月调整 OR 2.1 [95% CI 1.4-3.0] vs. 早产 aOR 1.1 [0.8-1.7];BMI ≥ 35.0 kg/m2 足月 aOR 2.2 [1.4-3.4] vs. 早产 aOR 1.5 [1.2-1.8]; p-交互作用 < 0.01),无产褥期 vs. 产褥期 1(足月 aOR 1.7 [1.1-2.7] vs. 早产 aOR 1.2 [0.9-1.6]; p-交互作用 < 0.01),亚裔 vs. 白人(p-交互作用 < 0.01)。与早产相比,高龄产妇、吸烟和先兆子痫与足月死胎的关联较弱或缺乏关联。这些差异有助于设计及时的监测和干预措施,以进一步降低死胎风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Differences in Factors Associated With Preterm and Term Stillbirth: A Secondary Cohort Analysis of the DESiGN Trial

Objective

To identify whether maternal and pregnancy characteristics associated with stillbirth differ between preterm and term stillbirth.

Design

Secondary cohort analysis of the DESiGN RCT.

Setting

Thirteen UK maternity units.

Population

Singleton pregnant women and their babies.

Methods

Multiple logistic regression was used to assess whether the 12 factors explored were associated with stillbirth. Interaction tests assessed for a difference in these associations between the preterm and term periods.

Main Outcome Measure

Stillbirth stratified by preterm (<37+0 weeks') and term (37+0–42+6 weeks') births.

Results

A total of 195 344 pregnancies were included. Six hundred and sixty-seven were stillborn (3.4 per 1000 births), of which 431 (65%) were preterm. Significant interactions were observed for maternal age, ethnicity, IMD, BMI, parity, smoking, PAPP-A, gestational hypertension, pre-eclampsia and gestational diabetes but not for chronic hypertension and pre-existing diabetes. Stronger associations with term stillbirth were observed in women with obesity compared to BMI 18.5–24.9 kg/m2 (BMI 30.0–34.9 kg/m2 term adjusted OR 2.1 [95% CI 1.4–3.0] vs. preterm aOR 1.1 [0.8–1.7]; BMI ≥ 35.0 kg/m2 term aOR 2.2 [1.4–3.4] vs. preterm aOR 1.5 [1.2–1.8]; p-interaction < 0.01), nulliparity compared to parity 1 (term aOR 1.7 [1.1–2.7] vs. preterm aOR 1.2 [0.9–1.6]; p-interaction < 0.01) and Asian ethnicity compared with White (p-interaction < 0.01). A weaker or lack of association with term, compared to preterm, stillbirth was observed for older maternal age, smoking and pre-eclampsia.

Conclusion

Differences in association exist between mothers experiencing preterm and term stillbirth. These differences could contribute to design of timely surveillance and interventions to further mitigate the risk of stillbirth.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
5.20%
发文量
345
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BJOG is an editorially independent publication owned by the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG). The Journal publishes original, peer-reviewed work in all areas of obstetrics and gynaecology, including contraception, urogynaecology, fertility, oncology and clinical practice. Its aim is to publish the highest quality medical research in women''s health, worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Fetal Fraction of Cell-Free DNA in the Prediction of Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: A Nationwide Retrospective Cohort Study. The Contribution of Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy to Neonatal Unit Admissions and Iatrogenic Preterm Delivery at < 34+0 Weeks' Gestation in the UK: A Population-Based Study Using the National Neonatal Research Database. Unilateral Oophorectomy and Age at Natural Menopause: A Longitudinal Community-Based Cohort Study. Biopsychosocial Approaches for the Management of Female Chronic Pelvic Pain: A Systematic Review. Outcome Reporting in Studies Investigating Treatment for Caesarean Scar Ectopic Pregnancy: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1