Sebastian Towers, Aleksandra Kalisz, Alicia Higueruelo, Francesca Vianello, Ming-Han Chloe Tsai, Harrison Steel, Jakob N. Foerster
{"title":"为抗体开发塑造对手","authors":"Sebastian Towers, Aleksandra Kalisz, Alicia Higueruelo, Francesca Vianello, Ming-Han Chloe Tsai, Harrison Steel, Jakob N. Foerster","doi":"arxiv-2409.10588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Anti-viral therapies are typically designed or evolved towards the current\nstrains of a virus. In learning terms, this corresponds to a myopic best\nresponse, i.e., not considering the possible adaptive moves of the opponent.\nHowever, therapy-induced selective pressures act on viral antigens to drive the\nemergence of mutated strains, against which initial therapies have reduced\nefficacy. To motivate our work, we consider antibody designs that target not\nonly the current viral strains but also the wide range of possible future\nvariants that the virus might evolve into under the evolutionary pressure\nexerted by said antibodies. Building on a computational model of binding\nbetween antibodies and viral antigens (the Absolut! framework), we design and\nimplement a genetic simulation of the viral evolutionary escape. Crucially,\nthis allows our antibody optimisation algorithm to consider and influence the\nentire escape curve of the virus, i.e. to guide (or ''shape'') the viral\nevolution. This is inspired by opponent shaping which, in general-sum learning,\naccounts for the adaptation of the co-player rather than playing a myopic best\nresponse. Hence we call the optimised antibodies shapers. Within our\nsimulations, we demonstrate that our shapers target both current and simulated\nfuture viral variants, outperforming the antibodies chosen in a myopic way.\nFurthermore, we show that shapers exert specific evolutionary pressure on the\nvirus compared to myopic antibodies. Altogether, shapers modify the\nevolutionary trajectories of viral strains and minimise the viral escape\ncompared to their myopic counterparts. While this is a simple model, we hope\nthat our proposed paradigm will enable the discovery of better long-lived\nvaccines and antibody therapies in the future, enabled by rapid advancements in\nthe capabilities of simulation tools.","PeriodicalId":501044,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuanBio - Populations and Evolution","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Opponent Shaping for Antibody Development\",\"authors\":\"Sebastian Towers, Aleksandra Kalisz, Alicia Higueruelo, Francesca Vianello, Ming-Han Chloe Tsai, Harrison Steel, Jakob N. Foerster\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.10588\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Anti-viral therapies are typically designed or evolved towards the current\\nstrains of a virus. In learning terms, this corresponds to a myopic best\\nresponse, i.e., not considering the possible adaptive moves of the opponent.\\nHowever, therapy-induced selective pressures act on viral antigens to drive the\\nemergence of mutated strains, against which initial therapies have reduced\\nefficacy. To motivate our work, we consider antibody designs that target not\\nonly the current viral strains but also the wide range of possible future\\nvariants that the virus might evolve into under the evolutionary pressure\\nexerted by said antibodies. Building on a computational model of binding\\nbetween antibodies and viral antigens (the Absolut! framework), we design and\\nimplement a genetic simulation of the viral evolutionary escape. Crucially,\\nthis allows our antibody optimisation algorithm to consider and influence the\\nentire escape curve of the virus, i.e. to guide (or ''shape'') the viral\\nevolution. This is inspired by opponent shaping which, in general-sum learning,\\naccounts for the adaptation of the co-player rather than playing a myopic best\\nresponse. Hence we call the optimised antibodies shapers. Within our\\nsimulations, we demonstrate that our shapers target both current and simulated\\nfuture viral variants, outperforming the antibodies chosen in a myopic way.\\nFurthermore, we show that shapers exert specific evolutionary pressure on the\\nvirus compared to myopic antibodies. Altogether, shapers modify the\\nevolutionary trajectories of viral strains and minimise the viral escape\\ncompared to their myopic counterparts. While this is a simple model, we hope\\nthat our proposed paradigm will enable the discovery of better long-lived\\nvaccines and antibody therapies in the future, enabled by rapid advancements in\\nthe capabilities of simulation tools.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - QuanBio - Populations and Evolution\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - QuanBio - Populations and Evolution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.10588\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuanBio - Populations and Evolution","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.10588","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Anti-viral therapies are typically designed or evolved towards the current
strains of a virus. In learning terms, this corresponds to a myopic best
response, i.e., not considering the possible adaptive moves of the opponent.
However, therapy-induced selective pressures act on viral antigens to drive the
emergence of mutated strains, against which initial therapies have reduced
efficacy. To motivate our work, we consider antibody designs that target not
only the current viral strains but also the wide range of possible future
variants that the virus might evolve into under the evolutionary pressure
exerted by said antibodies. Building on a computational model of binding
between antibodies and viral antigens (the Absolut! framework), we design and
implement a genetic simulation of the viral evolutionary escape. Crucially,
this allows our antibody optimisation algorithm to consider and influence the
entire escape curve of the virus, i.e. to guide (or ''shape'') the viral
evolution. This is inspired by opponent shaping which, in general-sum learning,
accounts for the adaptation of the co-player rather than playing a myopic best
response. Hence we call the optimised antibodies shapers. Within our
simulations, we demonstrate that our shapers target both current and simulated
future viral variants, outperforming the antibodies chosen in a myopic way.
Furthermore, we show that shapers exert specific evolutionary pressure on the
virus compared to myopic antibodies. Altogether, shapers modify the
evolutionary trajectories of viral strains and minimise the viral escape
compared to their myopic counterparts. While this is a simple model, we hope
that our proposed paradigm will enable the discovery of better long-lived
vaccines and antibody therapies in the future, enabled by rapid advancements in
the capabilities of simulation tools.