{"title":"在晚期非小细胞肺癌和其他恶性肿瘤患者中使用沙生利单抗替代给药方案的药代动力学、安全性和疗效。","authors":"Konstantin Penkov,Igor Bondarenko,Daria Viktorovna Saenko,Yaroslav Kulyaba,Jun Guo,Yi Gong,Noboru Yamamoto,Yevhen Stepanovych Hotko,Vasyl Boyko,Natalya Vladimirovna Fadeeva,Grygorii Mykolaiovych Ursol,Hee Kyung Ahn,Nikolay Viktorovich Kislov,Chia-I Shen,Craig Davis,Karey Kowalski,Elisabete Michelon,Dmitri Pavlov,Tomoko Hirohashi,Byoung Chul Cho","doi":"10.1177/17588359241274592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\r\nSasanlimab (PF-06801591), a humanized immunoglobulin G4 monoclonal antibody, binds to programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1), preventing ligand (PD-L1) interaction.\r\n\r\nObjectives\r\nTo evaluate pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, tolerability, and efficacy of two subcutaneous sasanlimab dosing regimens.\r\n\r\nDesign\r\nAn open-label study consisting of phases Ib and II. Phase Ib: non-randomized, dose escalation, and expansion study in Asian participants with advanced malignancies.\r\n\r\nPhase II\r\nconducted globally in participants with non-small-cell lung cancer with PD-L1 positive or PD-L1 status unknown tumors; participants were randomized 1:2 to receive subcutaneous sasanlimab 300 mg once every 4 weeks (300 mg-Q4W) or 600 mg once every 6 weeks (600 mg-Q6W).\r\n\r\nMethods\r\nPrimary endpoint in phase Ib: dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) occurring in first treatment cycle; in phase II: C trough and AUC.\r\n\r\nResults\r\nA total of 155 participants (phase Ib, n = 34; phase II, n = 121) received sasanlimab. Phase Ib: no DLT reported. Phase II: ratio of adjusted geometric mean for AUCtau was 231.2 (90% CI, 190.1-281.2) and C trough was 111.5 (90% CI, 86.3-144.0) following 600 mg-Q6W (test) versus 300 mg-Q4W (reference). Phase Ib: grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 1/4 (25%) and 3/12 (25%) participants treated in 300 mg-Q4W dose escalation and expansion cohorts, respectively. Phase II: grade 3 TRAEs occurred in 3/41 (7.3%) and 3/80 (3.8%) participants treated with 300 mg-Q4W and 600 mg-Q6W, respectively; no grade 4/5 TRAEs. Phase II: confirmed objective response was observed in 11/41 (26.8% (95% CI, 14.2-42.9)) and 12/80 (15.0% (95% CI, 8.0-24.7)) participants treated with 300 mg-Q4W and 600 mg-Q6W, respectively.\r\n\r\nConclusions\r\nPhase Ib regimens were considered safe with no DLTs reported. In phase II, 600 mg-Q6W regimen criteria were met for AUCtau and C trough metrics to support PK-based extrapolation of efficacy of alternative regimen. Regimens were well tolerated, showing anti-tumor activity in participants with advanced solid tumors. Administration of sasanlimab at a dose of 600 mg-Q6W subcutaneously may serve as a convenient alternative to 300 mg-Q4W administration.\r\n\r\nTrial registration\r\nNCT04181788 (ClinicalTrials.gov); 2019-003818-14 (EudraCT).","PeriodicalId":23053,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology","volume":"24 1","pages":"17588359241274592"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of an alternative dosing regimen of sasanlimab in participants with advanced NSCLC and other malignancies.\",\"authors\":\"Konstantin Penkov,Igor Bondarenko,Daria Viktorovna Saenko,Yaroslav Kulyaba,Jun Guo,Yi Gong,Noboru Yamamoto,Yevhen Stepanovych Hotko,Vasyl Boyko,Natalya Vladimirovna Fadeeva,Grygorii Mykolaiovych Ursol,Hee Kyung Ahn,Nikolay Viktorovich Kislov,Chia-I Shen,Craig Davis,Karey Kowalski,Elisabete Michelon,Dmitri Pavlov,Tomoko Hirohashi,Byoung Chul Cho\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17588359241274592\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background\\r\\nSasanlimab (PF-06801591), a humanized immunoglobulin G4 monoclonal antibody, binds to programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1), preventing ligand (PD-L1) interaction.\\r\\n\\r\\nObjectives\\r\\nTo evaluate pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, tolerability, and efficacy of two subcutaneous sasanlimab dosing regimens.\\r\\n\\r\\nDesign\\r\\nAn open-label study consisting of phases Ib and II. Phase Ib: non-randomized, dose escalation, and expansion study in Asian participants with advanced malignancies.\\r\\n\\r\\nPhase II\\r\\nconducted globally in participants with non-small-cell lung cancer with PD-L1 positive or PD-L1 status unknown tumors; participants were randomized 1:2 to receive subcutaneous sasanlimab 300 mg once every 4 weeks (300 mg-Q4W) or 600 mg once every 6 weeks (600 mg-Q6W).\\r\\n\\r\\nMethods\\r\\nPrimary endpoint in phase Ib: dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) occurring in first treatment cycle; in phase II: C trough and AUC.\\r\\n\\r\\nResults\\r\\nA total of 155 participants (phase Ib, n = 34; phase II, n = 121) received sasanlimab. Phase Ib: no DLT reported. Phase II: ratio of adjusted geometric mean for AUCtau was 231.2 (90% CI, 190.1-281.2) and C trough was 111.5 (90% CI, 86.3-144.0) following 600 mg-Q6W (test) versus 300 mg-Q4W (reference). Phase Ib: grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 1/4 (25%) and 3/12 (25%) participants treated in 300 mg-Q4W dose escalation and expansion cohorts, respectively. Phase II: grade 3 TRAEs occurred in 3/41 (7.3%) and 3/80 (3.8%) participants treated with 300 mg-Q4W and 600 mg-Q6W, respectively; no grade 4/5 TRAEs. Phase II: confirmed objective response was observed in 11/41 (26.8% (95% CI, 14.2-42.9)) and 12/80 (15.0% (95% CI, 8.0-24.7)) participants treated with 300 mg-Q4W and 600 mg-Q6W, respectively.\\r\\n\\r\\nConclusions\\r\\nPhase Ib regimens were considered safe with no DLTs reported. In phase II, 600 mg-Q6W regimen criteria were met for AUCtau and C trough metrics to support PK-based extrapolation of efficacy of alternative regimen. Regimens were well tolerated, showing anti-tumor activity in participants with advanced solid tumors. Administration of sasanlimab at a dose of 600 mg-Q6W subcutaneously may serve as a convenient alternative to 300 mg-Q4W administration.\\r\\n\\r\\nTrial registration\\r\\nNCT04181788 (ClinicalTrials.gov); 2019-003818-14 (EudraCT).\",\"PeriodicalId\":23053,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"17588359241274592\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17588359241274592\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17588359241274592","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy of an alternative dosing regimen of sasanlimab in participants with advanced NSCLC and other malignancies.
Background
Sasanlimab (PF-06801591), a humanized immunoglobulin G4 monoclonal antibody, binds to programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1), preventing ligand (PD-L1) interaction.
Objectives
To evaluate pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, tolerability, and efficacy of two subcutaneous sasanlimab dosing regimens.
Design
An open-label study consisting of phases Ib and II. Phase Ib: non-randomized, dose escalation, and expansion study in Asian participants with advanced malignancies.
Phase II
conducted globally in participants with non-small-cell lung cancer with PD-L1 positive or PD-L1 status unknown tumors; participants were randomized 1:2 to receive subcutaneous sasanlimab 300 mg once every 4 weeks (300 mg-Q4W) or 600 mg once every 6 weeks (600 mg-Q6W).
Methods
Primary endpoint in phase Ib: dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) occurring in first treatment cycle; in phase II: C trough and AUC.
Results
A total of 155 participants (phase Ib, n = 34; phase II, n = 121) received sasanlimab. Phase Ib: no DLT reported. Phase II: ratio of adjusted geometric mean for AUCtau was 231.2 (90% CI, 190.1-281.2) and C trough was 111.5 (90% CI, 86.3-144.0) following 600 mg-Q6W (test) versus 300 mg-Q4W (reference). Phase Ib: grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 1/4 (25%) and 3/12 (25%) participants treated in 300 mg-Q4W dose escalation and expansion cohorts, respectively. Phase II: grade 3 TRAEs occurred in 3/41 (7.3%) and 3/80 (3.8%) participants treated with 300 mg-Q4W and 600 mg-Q6W, respectively; no grade 4/5 TRAEs. Phase II: confirmed objective response was observed in 11/41 (26.8% (95% CI, 14.2-42.9)) and 12/80 (15.0% (95% CI, 8.0-24.7)) participants treated with 300 mg-Q4W and 600 mg-Q6W, respectively.
Conclusions
Phase Ib regimens were considered safe with no DLTs reported. In phase II, 600 mg-Q6W regimen criteria were met for AUCtau and C trough metrics to support PK-based extrapolation of efficacy of alternative regimen. Regimens were well tolerated, showing anti-tumor activity in participants with advanced solid tumors. Administration of sasanlimab at a dose of 600 mg-Q6W subcutaneously may serve as a convenient alternative to 300 mg-Q4W administration.
Trial registration
NCT04181788 (ClinicalTrials.gov); 2019-003818-14 (EudraCT).
期刊介绍:
Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal delivering the highest quality articles, reviews, and scholarly comment on pioneering efforts and innovative studies in the medical treatment of cancer. The journal has a strong clinical and pharmacological focus and is aimed at clinicians and researchers in medical oncology, providing a forum in print and online for publishing the highest quality articles in this area. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).