脑动脉瘤患者术中破裂的预后和预测因素

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Acta Neurochirurgica Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI:10.1007/s00701-024-06262-0
Dongkyu Kim, Sang Kyu Park, Joonho Chung
{"title":"脑动脉瘤患者术中破裂的预后和预测因素","authors":"Dongkyu Kim, Sang Kyu Park, Joonho Chung","doi":"10.1007/s00701-024-06262-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Intraprocedural rupture (IPR) is a devastating complication of cerebral aneurysm treatment. While several studies have investigated its risk factors and clinical impact, further research with larger populations is warranted.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>We retrospectively reviewed data from 4,039 patients with 4,233 cerebral aneurysms treated at our institution between January 2009 and December 2018. Multivariate logistic regression with stepwise elimination was performed to identify the independent risk factors of IPR. Unfavorable clinical outcome was defined as a Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≥ 3 points at 3 months post-treatment.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>IPR occurred in 61 (1.44%) of the 4,233 aneurysms. Multivariate analysis showed that previously ruptured aneurysms (odds ratio [OR] 3.182; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.851–5.470; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), surgical clipping (OR 3.598; 95% CI 1.894–6.836; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), and higher aspect ratio (OR 1.310; 95% CI 1.032–1.663; <i>p</i> = 0.024) were independent risk factors for IPR. Patients with IPR had significantly higher rates of unfavorable clinical outcomes (mRS ≥ 3) compared to those without (18.0% vs. 3.3%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). However, within the ruptured aneurysm subgroup, the rate of unfavorable outcomes did not differ significantly between IPR and non-IPR groups (22.7% vs. 19.2%, <i>p</i> = 0.594).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Ruptured aneurysms, surgical clipping, and higher aspect ratio were independently associated with IPR. IPR significantly increased the risk of unfavorable clinical outcomes regardless of treatment approach, except in the subgroup of ruptured aneurysms.</p>","PeriodicalId":7370,"journal":{"name":"Acta Neurochirurgica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes and predictors of intraprocedural rupture in patients with cerebral aneurysm\",\"authors\":\"Dongkyu Kim, Sang Kyu Park, Joonho Chung\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00701-024-06262-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Background</h3><p>Intraprocedural rupture (IPR) is a devastating complication of cerebral aneurysm treatment. While several studies have investigated its risk factors and clinical impact, further research with larger populations is warranted.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>We retrospectively reviewed data from 4,039 patients with 4,233 cerebral aneurysms treated at our institution between January 2009 and December 2018. Multivariate logistic regression with stepwise elimination was performed to identify the independent risk factors of IPR. Unfavorable clinical outcome was defined as a Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≥ 3 points at 3 months post-treatment.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>IPR occurred in 61 (1.44%) of the 4,233 aneurysms. Multivariate analysis showed that previously ruptured aneurysms (odds ratio [OR] 3.182; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.851–5.470; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), surgical clipping (OR 3.598; 95% CI 1.894–6.836; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), and higher aspect ratio (OR 1.310; 95% CI 1.032–1.663; <i>p</i> = 0.024) were independent risk factors for IPR. Patients with IPR had significantly higher rates of unfavorable clinical outcomes (mRS ≥ 3) compared to those without (18.0% vs. 3.3%, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). However, within the ruptured aneurysm subgroup, the rate of unfavorable outcomes did not differ significantly between IPR and non-IPR groups (22.7% vs. 19.2%, <i>p</i> = 0.594).</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusion</h3><p>Ruptured aneurysms, surgical clipping, and higher aspect ratio were independently associated with IPR. IPR significantly increased the risk of unfavorable clinical outcomes regardless of treatment approach, except in the subgroup of ruptured aneurysms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Neurochirurgica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Neurochirurgica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-024-06262-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Neurochirurgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-024-06262-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景序贯破裂(IPR)是脑动脉瘤治疗过程中的一种破坏性并发症。虽然已有多项研究对其风险因素和临床影响进行了调查,但仍需对更大的人群进行进一步研究。方法我们回顾性地审查了 2009 年 1 月至 2018 年 12 月期间在我院接受治疗的 4233 名脑动脉瘤患者的数据。采用逐步剔除法进行多变量逻辑回归,以确定 IPR 的独立风险因素。不利的临床结局定义为治疗后3个月时改良Rankin量表(mRS)≥3分。结果 4233个动脉瘤中有61个(1.44%)发生了IPR。多变量分析显示,先前破裂的动脉瘤(几率比[OR] 3.182;95% 置信区间[CI] 1.851-5.470;p <;0.001)、手术夹闭(OR 3.598;95% CI 1.894-6.836;p <;0.001)和较高的纵横比(OR 1.310;95% CI 1.032-1.663;p = 0.024)是 IPR 的独立风险因素。与无 IPR 的患者相比,有 IPR 的患者出现不良临床结果(mRS ≥ 3)的比例明显更高(18.0% vs. 3.3%,p < 0.001)。然而,在动脉瘤破裂亚组中,IPR 组和非 IPR 组的不良后果发生率没有显著差异(22.7% vs. 19.2%,p = 0.594)。除破裂动脉瘤亚组外,无论采用哪种治疗方法,IPR都会明显增加不利临床结果的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Outcomes and predictors of intraprocedural rupture in patients with cerebral aneurysm

Background

Intraprocedural rupture (IPR) is a devastating complication of cerebral aneurysm treatment. While several studies have investigated its risk factors and clinical impact, further research with larger populations is warranted.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed data from 4,039 patients with 4,233 cerebral aneurysms treated at our institution between January 2009 and December 2018. Multivariate logistic regression with stepwise elimination was performed to identify the independent risk factors of IPR. Unfavorable clinical outcome was defined as a Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≥ 3 points at 3 months post-treatment.

Results

IPR occurred in 61 (1.44%) of the 4,233 aneurysms. Multivariate analysis showed that previously ruptured aneurysms (odds ratio [OR] 3.182; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.851–5.470; p < 0.001), surgical clipping (OR 3.598; 95% CI 1.894–6.836; p < 0.001), and higher aspect ratio (OR 1.310; 95% CI 1.032–1.663; p = 0.024) were independent risk factors for IPR. Patients with IPR had significantly higher rates of unfavorable clinical outcomes (mRS ≥ 3) compared to those without (18.0% vs. 3.3%, p < 0.001). However, within the ruptured aneurysm subgroup, the rate of unfavorable outcomes did not differ significantly between IPR and non-IPR groups (22.7% vs. 19.2%, p = 0.594).

Conclusion

Ruptured aneurysms, surgical clipping, and higher aspect ratio were independently associated with IPR. IPR significantly increased the risk of unfavorable clinical outcomes regardless of treatment approach, except in the subgroup of ruptured aneurysms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Neurochirurgica
Acta Neurochirurgica 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
342
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The journal "Acta Neurochirurgica" publishes only original papers useful both to research and clinical work. Papers should deal with clinical neurosurgery - diagnosis and diagnostic techniques, operative surgery and results, postoperative treatment - or with research work in neuroscience if the underlying questions or the results are of neurosurgical interest. Reports on congresses are given in brief accounts. As official organ of the European Association of Neurosurgical Societies the journal publishes all announcements of the E.A.N.S. and reports on the activities of its member societies. Only contributions written in English will be accepted.
期刊最新文献
Contusion expansion, low platelet count and bifrontal contusions are associated with worse patient outcome following traumatic brain injury-a retrospective single-center study. Neuroanatomical photogrammetric models using smartphones: a comparison of apps. How I do it: safe resection of a complex type 3 foramen magnum meningioma with dorsal displacement of the neurovascular bundle. Correction to: Influence of preoperative embolisation on resection of brain arteriovenous malformations: cohort study. Retraction Note: Inhibition of c-Jun N-terminal kinase prevents blood-brain barrier disruption and normalizes the expression of tight junction proteins clautin-5 and ZO-1 in a rat model of subarachnoid hemorrhage.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1