钢框架的瑞利阻尼与模态阻尼矩阵叠加以及高模态贡献评估

IF 1.7 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI:10.1007/s40996-024-01615-2
Mario D. Llanes-Tizoc, Federico Valenzuela-Beltrán, Edén Bojórquez, Juan Bojórquez, José R. Gaxiola-Camacho, Jesus M. Leal-Graciano, Robespierre Chavez-López, Alfredo Reyes-Salazar
{"title":"钢框架的瑞利阻尼与模态阻尼矩阵叠加以及高模态贡献评估","authors":"Mario D. Llanes-Tizoc, Federico Valenzuela-Beltrán, Edén Bojórquez, Juan Bojórquez, José R. Gaxiola-Camacho, Jesus M. Leal-Graciano, Robespierre Chavez-López, Alfredo Reyes-Salazar","doi":"10.1007/s40996-024-01615-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Rayleigh damping is usually adopted in seismic analysis of steel buildings to develop the damping matrix (<i>C</i><sup><i>R</i></sup>), where the initial stiffness (<i>K</i><sub><i>i</i></sub>) and the lumped mass (<i>M</i><sub><i>L</i></sub>) matrices, and the first two lateral vibration modes are often used. Additionally, it is a widespread practice to use <i>M</i><sub><i>L</i></sub> in the nonlinear dynamic equilibrium equation. Similarly, the contributions to the response of higher modes related to rotations and vertical displacement of joints (JR-VD) are generally ignored. In this study, some issues related to these practices are addressed, contrasting the results obtained through the use of <i>C</i><sup><i>R</i></sup> with those of a damping matrix (<i>C</i><sup><i>M</i></sup>) obtained with a more accurate model as that of modal damping matrix superposition (MDMS) procedure, and by comparing the responses derived from <i>M</i><sub><i>L</i></sub> with those of the consistent mass matrix (<i>M</i><sub><i>C</i></sub>). Three steel building models are used, which are considered low, medium and high height. If <i>C</i><sup><i>R</i></sup> is adopted, axial loads, bending moments, drifts, and interstory shears are underestimated, on average, by up to 42%, 23%, 22% and 20%, respectively, compared to the results obtained with the MDMS procedure; the horizontal damping forces are overestimated by up to 232%. The contribution of the JR-VD modes can be up 41% for axial loads and up to 20% for bending moments, interstory shears and drifts. If <i>M</i><sub><i>L</i></sub> and <i>K</i><sub><i>i</i></sub> are used, average overestimations of up to 80% are observed for axial loads with respect to those of <i>M</i><sub><i>C</i></sub> and the tangent stiffness matrix (<i>K</i><sub><i>t</i></sub>); bending moments and interstory shears, in contrast, can be underestimated by up to 24% and 16%, respectively. Hence, the <i>C</i><sup><i>M</i></sup>, <i>K</i><sub><i>t</i></sub> and <i>M</i><sub><i>C</i></sub> matrices should be used; the contributions of the JR-VD modes should not be overlooked; and if <i>C</i><sup><i>R</i></sup> is used, to increase the accuracy, mode 1 and a mode greater than the second must be considered to obtain the Rayleigh damping matrix. Failure to do so may result in non-conservative designs.</p>","PeriodicalId":14550,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rayleigh Damping vs. Modal Damping Matrix Superposition for Steel Frames and Evaluation of Higher-Mode Contribution\",\"authors\":\"Mario D. Llanes-Tizoc, Federico Valenzuela-Beltrán, Edén Bojórquez, Juan Bojórquez, José R. Gaxiola-Camacho, Jesus M. Leal-Graciano, Robespierre Chavez-López, Alfredo Reyes-Salazar\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40996-024-01615-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Rayleigh damping is usually adopted in seismic analysis of steel buildings to develop the damping matrix (<i>C</i><sup><i>R</i></sup>), where the initial stiffness (<i>K</i><sub><i>i</i></sub>) and the lumped mass (<i>M</i><sub><i>L</i></sub>) matrices, and the first two lateral vibration modes are often used. Additionally, it is a widespread practice to use <i>M</i><sub><i>L</i></sub> in the nonlinear dynamic equilibrium equation. Similarly, the contributions to the response of higher modes related to rotations and vertical displacement of joints (JR-VD) are generally ignored. In this study, some issues related to these practices are addressed, contrasting the results obtained through the use of <i>C</i><sup><i>R</i></sup> with those of a damping matrix (<i>C</i><sup><i>M</i></sup>) obtained with a more accurate model as that of modal damping matrix superposition (MDMS) procedure, and by comparing the responses derived from <i>M</i><sub><i>L</i></sub> with those of the consistent mass matrix (<i>M</i><sub><i>C</i></sub>). Three steel building models are used, which are considered low, medium and high height. If <i>C</i><sup><i>R</i></sup> is adopted, axial loads, bending moments, drifts, and interstory shears are underestimated, on average, by up to 42%, 23%, 22% and 20%, respectively, compared to the results obtained with the MDMS procedure; the horizontal damping forces are overestimated by up to 232%. The contribution of the JR-VD modes can be up 41% for axial loads and up to 20% for bending moments, interstory shears and drifts. If <i>M</i><sub><i>L</i></sub> and <i>K</i><sub><i>i</i></sub> are used, average overestimations of up to 80% are observed for axial loads with respect to those of <i>M</i><sub><i>C</i></sub> and the tangent stiffness matrix (<i>K</i><sub><i>t</i></sub>); bending moments and interstory shears, in contrast, can be underestimated by up to 24% and 16%, respectively. Hence, the <i>C</i><sup><i>M</i></sup>, <i>K</i><sub><i>t</i></sub> and <i>M</i><sub><i>C</i></sub> matrices should be used; the contributions of the JR-VD modes should not be overlooked; and if <i>C</i><sup><i>R</i></sup> is used, to increase the accuracy, mode 1 and a mode greater than the second must be considered to obtain the Rayleigh damping matrix. Failure to do so may result in non-conservative designs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14550,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-024-01615-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-024-01615-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在钢结构建筑的抗震分析中,通常采用瑞利阻尼来建立阻尼矩阵 (CR),其中初始刚度 (Ki) 和总质量 (ML) 矩阵以及前两个侧向振动模式通常都会用到。此外,在非线性动力平衡方程中使用 ML 也是一种普遍做法。同样,与旋转和关节垂直位移(JR-VD)相关的较高模态对响应的贡献通常也被忽略。本研究探讨了与这些做法相关的一些问题,将使用 CR 得出的结果与使用模态阻尼矩阵叠加(MDMS)程序等更精确模型得出的阻尼矩阵(CM)的结果进行对比,并将 ML 得出的响应与一致质量矩阵(MC)的响应进行对比。我们使用了三种钢结构建筑模型,分别为低层、中层和高层建筑。如果采用 CR,与 MDMS 程序得出的结果相比,轴向荷载、弯矩、漂移和层间剪力平均分别被低估了 42%、23%、22% 和 20%;水平阻尼力被高估了 232%。对于轴向荷载,JR-VD 模式的贡献率可达 41%,对于弯矩、层间剪力和漂移,JR-VD 模式的贡献率可达 20%。如果使用 ML 和 Ki,与 MC 和切线刚度矩阵 (Kt) 相比,轴向荷载的平均高估率高达 80%;相反,弯矩和层间剪力的低估率分别高达 24% 和 16%。因此,应使用 CM、Kt 和 MC 矩阵;不应忽视 JR-VD 模式的贡献;如果使用 CR,为提高精度,必须考虑模式 1 和大于模式 2 的模式,以获得瑞利阻尼矩阵。否则可能导致非保守设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rayleigh Damping vs. Modal Damping Matrix Superposition for Steel Frames and Evaluation of Higher-Mode Contribution

Rayleigh damping is usually adopted in seismic analysis of steel buildings to develop the damping matrix (CR), where the initial stiffness (Ki) and the lumped mass (ML) matrices, and the first two lateral vibration modes are often used. Additionally, it is a widespread practice to use ML in the nonlinear dynamic equilibrium equation. Similarly, the contributions to the response of higher modes related to rotations and vertical displacement of joints (JR-VD) are generally ignored. In this study, some issues related to these practices are addressed, contrasting the results obtained through the use of CR with those of a damping matrix (CM) obtained with a more accurate model as that of modal damping matrix superposition (MDMS) procedure, and by comparing the responses derived from ML with those of the consistent mass matrix (MC). Three steel building models are used, which are considered low, medium and high height. If CR is adopted, axial loads, bending moments, drifts, and interstory shears are underestimated, on average, by up to 42%, 23%, 22% and 20%, respectively, compared to the results obtained with the MDMS procedure; the horizontal damping forces are overestimated by up to 232%. The contribution of the JR-VD modes can be up 41% for axial loads and up to 20% for bending moments, interstory shears and drifts. If ML and Ki are used, average overestimations of up to 80% are observed for axial loads with respect to those of MC and the tangent stiffness matrix (Kt); bending moments and interstory shears, in contrast, can be underestimated by up to 24% and 16%, respectively. Hence, the CM, Kt and MC matrices should be used; the contributions of the JR-VD modes should not be overlooked; and if CR is used, to increase the accuracy, mode 1 and a mode greater than the second must be considered to obtain the Rayleigh damping matrix. Failure to do so may result in non-conservative designs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
11.80%
发文量
203
期刊介绍: The aim of the Iranian Journal of Science and Technology is to foster the growth of scientific research among Iranian engineers and scientists and to provide a medium by means of which the fruits of these researches may be brought to the attention of the world’s civil Engineering communities. This transaction focuses on all aspects of Civil Engineering and will accept the original research contributions (previously unpublished) from all areas of established engineering disciplines. The papers may be theoretical, experimental or both. The journal publishes original papers within the broad field of civil engineering which include, but are not limited to, the following: -Structural engineering- Earthquake engineering- Concrete engineering- Construction management- Steel structures- Engineering mechanics- Water resources engineering- Hydraulic engineering- Hydraulic structures- Environmental engineering- Soil mechanics- Foundation engineering- Geotechnical engineering- Transportation engineering- Surveying and geomatics.
期刊最新文献
Coupled Rainfall-Runoff and Hydrodynamic Modeling using MIKE + for Flood Simulation Mechanical and Microstructural Characteristics of Fly Ash-Nano-Silica Composites Enhancement of the Mechanical Characteristics of a Green Mortar Under Extreme Conditions: Experimental Study and Optimization Analysis A Case Study on the Effect of Multiple Earthquakes on Mid-rise RC Buildings with Mass and Stiffness Irregularity in Height Incremental Plastic Analysis of Confined Concrete Considering the Variation of Elastic Moduli
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1