{"title":"基态能量并不总是与电子数呈凸性关系","authors":"Simone Di Marino, Mathieu Lewin, Luca Nenna","doi":"arxiv-2409.08632","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We provide the first counter-example showing that the ground state energy of\nelectrons in an external Coulomb potential is not always a convex function of\nthe number of electrons. This property had been conjectured to hold for decades\nand it plays an important role in quantum chemistry. Our counter-example\ninvolves an external potential generated by six nuclei of small fractional\ncharges, placed far away from each other. The ground state energy of 3\nelectrons is proved to be higher than the average of the energies for 2 and 4\nelectrons. In addition, we show that the nuclei can bind 2 or 4 electrons, but\nnot 3. Although the conjecture remains open for real nuclei (of integer\ncharges), our work sets some doubt on the validity of the energy convexity for\ngeneral atoms and molecules.","PeriodicalId":501373,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - MATH - Spectral Theory","volume":"65 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The ground state energy is not always convex in the number of electrons\",\"authors\":\"Simone Di Marino, Mathieu Lewin, Luca Nenna\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.08632\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We provide the first counter-example showing that the ground state energy of\\nelectrons in an external Coulomb potential is not always a convex function of\\nthe number of electrons. This property had been conjectured to hold for decades\\nand it plays an important role in quantum chemistry. Our counter-example\\ninvolves an external potential generated by six nuclei of small fractional\\ncharges, placed far away from each other. The ground state energy of 3\\nelectrons is proved to be higher than the average of the energies for 2 and 4\\nelectrons. In addition, we show that the nuclei can bind 2 or 4 electrons, but\\nnot 3. Although the conjecture remains open for real nuclei (of integer\\ncharges), our work sets some doubt on the validity of the energy convexity for\\ngeneral atoms and molecules.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501373,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - MATH - Spectral Theory\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - MATH - Spectral Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.08632\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - MATH - Spectral Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.08632","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The ground state energy is not always convex in the number of electrons
We provide the first counter-example showing that the ground state energy of
electrons in an external Coulomb potential is not always a convex function of
the number of electrons. This property had been conjectured to hold for decades
and it plays an important role in quantum chemistry. Our counter-example
involves an external potential generated by six nuclei of small fractional
charges, placed far away from each other. The ground state energy of 3
electrons is proved to be higher than the average of the energies for 2 and 4
electrons. In addition, we show that the nuclei can bind 2 or 4 electrons, but
not 3. Although the conjecture remains open for real nuclei (of integer
charges), our work sets some doubt on the validity of the energy convexity for
general atoms and molecules.