奶杯内套的几何形状影响奶牛的挤奶性能

IF 1.6 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Journal of Dairy Research Pub Date : 2024-09-16 DOI:10.1017/s002202992400027x
H. M Gayani P. Herath, Dino Kudrass, Racheal H. Bryant, Omar Al-Marashdeh
{"title":"奶杯内套的几何形状影响奶牛的挤奶性能","authors":"H. M Gayani P. Herath, Dino Kudrass, Racheal H. Bryant, Omar Al-Marashdeh","doi":"10.1017/s002202992400027x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The geometry of milk liners may affect milking performance and cow comfort as the milk liner is the only part of the milking machine that comes into contact with the teat. To determine the effect of alternative shape of milk liners we compared square (SQR) <span>vs.</span> the conventional round (RND) teat cup liner on milking performance and comfort of dairy cows. Treatment milk liners were randomly allocated to clusters within each side of the 12 a side double up-herringbone dairy shed in a complete randomised block design over two periods. Milking performance data from a total of 10 065 (late stage of lactation and once-a-day milking frequency, LATE) and 18 048 (early stage of lactation and twice-a-day milking frequency, EARLY) milking events were automatically recorded by a DeLaval milk meter, and separately analysed for LATE and EARLY, respectively. In EARLY, cow comfort behaviour was also recorded during afternoon milking sessions. Across the two study periods, average milk flow rate, milk flow rate during 0–15, 15–30 and 30–60 s after cluster attachment, and milk flow rate at cluster take-off were higher in SQR compared to RND treatment. Proportion of time in a milking session with low milk flow rate and duration of milking session were less in SQR compared to RND treatment. However, effect of geometry of milk liner on peak milk flow rate was inconsistent across the two-study periods. Peak milk flow rate was higher (<span>P</span> &lt; 0.001) in SQR than RND in LATE, but higher (<span>P</span> &lt; 0.001) in RND than SQR in EARLY. Stomping and kicking behaviours of cows were similar between treatments. Results of this study suggest that square milk liners potentially improve milking performance, without adverse effect on cow comfort compared to conventional round liners. Long-term, multi-site studies are required to confirm potential teat-end health benefits associated with square milk liners and further verify these results.</p>","PeriodicalId":15615,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dairy Research","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Geometry of milk liners affects milking performance in dairy cows\",\"authors\":\"H. M Gayani P. Herath, Dino Kudrass, Racheal H. Bryant, Omar Al-Marashdeh\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/s002202992400027x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The geometry of milk liners may affect milking performance and cow comfort as the milk liner is the only part of the milking machine that comes into contact with the teat. To determine the effect of alternative shape of milk liners we compared square (SQR) <span>vs.</span> the conventional round (RND) teat cup liner on milking performance and comfort of dairy cows. Treatment milk liners were randomly allocated to clusters within each side of the 12 a side double up-herringbone dairy shed in a complete randomised block design over two periods. Milking performance data from a total of 10 065 (late stage of lactation and once-a-day milking frequency, LATE) and 18 048 (early stage of lactation and twice-a-day milking frequency, EARLY) milking events were automatically recorded by a DeLaval milk meter, and separately analysed for LATE and EARLY, respectively. In EARLY, cow comfort behaviour was also recorded during afternoon milking sessions. Across the two study periods, average milk flow rate, milk flow rate during 0–15, 15–30 and 30–60 s after cluster attachment, and milk flow rate at cluster take-off were higher in SQR compared to RND treatment. Proportion of time in a milking session with low milk flow rate and duration of milking session were less in SQR compared to RND treatment. However, effect of geometry of milk liner on peak milk flow rate was inconsistent across the two-study periods. Peak milk flow rate was higher (<span>P</span> &lt; 0.001) in SQR than RND in LATE, but higher (<span>P</span> &lt; 0.001) in RND than SQR in EARLY. Stomping and kicking behaviours of cows were similar between treatments. Results of this study suggest that square milk liners potentially improve milking performance, without adverse effect on cow comfort compared to conventional round liners. Long-term, multi-site studies are required to confirm potential teat-end health benefits associated with square milk liners and further verify these results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15615,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Dairy Research\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Dairy Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/s002202992400027x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dairy Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s002202992400027x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

奶杯内套的几何形状可能会影响挤奶性能和奶牛舒适度,因为奶杯内套是挤奶机与乳头接触的唯一部件。为了确定奶杯内套的替代形状对奶牛挤奶性能和舒适度的影响,我们比较了方形(SQR)奶杯内套和传统圆形(RND)奶杯内套。采用完全随机区组设计,在两个时期内将处理奶杯内套随机分配到每侧12个双上人字形奶牛舍内的各组中。利拉伐奶量计自动记录了总共10 065次(泌乳晚期,一天挤奶一次,LATE)和18 048次(泌乳早期,一天挤奶两次,EARLY)挤奶数据,并分别对LATE和EARLY进行了分析。在 "早 "挤奶期,下午挤奶时也记录奶牛的舒适行为。在两个研究期间,与RND处理相比,SQR处理的平均奶流量、套杯后0-15秒、15-30秒和30-60秒期间的奶流量以及脱杯时的奶流量更高。与 RND 处理相比,SQR 处理中低奶流率挤奶时间比例和挤奶持续时间较短。然而,奶衬的几何形状对峰值奶流量的影响在两个研究期间并不一致。在晚期,SQR 比 RND 的峰值奶流量高(P < 0.001),但在早期,RND 比 SQR 的峰值奶流量高(P < 0.001)。不同处理间奶牛的蹬踢行为相似。本研究结果表明,与传统的圆形奶杯内套相比,方形奶杯内套可提高挤奶性能,而不会对奶牛的舒适度产生不利影响。需要进行长期、多站点研究,以确认方形奶杯内套对乳头末端健康的潜在益处,并进一步验证这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Geometry of milk liners affects milking performance in dairy cows

The geometry of milk liners may affect milking performance and cow comfort as the milk liner is the only part of the milking machine that comes into contact with the teat. To determine the effect of alternative shape of milk liners we compared square (SQR) vs. the conventional round (RND) teat cup liner on milking performance and comfort of dairy cows. Treatment milk liners were randomly allocated to clusters within each side of the 12 a side double up-herringbone dairy shed in a complete randomised block design over two periods. Milking performance data from a total of 10 065 (late stage of lactation and once-a-day milking frequency, LATE) and 18 048 (early stage of lactation and twice-a-day milking frequency, EARLY) milking events were automatically recorded by a DeLaval milk meter, and separately analysed for LATE and EARLY, respectively. In EARLY, cow comfort behaviour was also recorded during afternoon milking sessions. Across the two study periods, average milk flow rate, milk flow rate during 0–15, 15–30 and 30–60 s after cluster attachment, and milk flow rate at cluster take-off were higher in SQR compared to RND treatment. Proportion of time in a milking session with low milk flow rate and duration of milking session were less in SQR compared to RND treatment. However, effect of geometry of milk liner on peak milk flow rate was inconsistent across the two-study periods. Peak milk flow rate was higher (P < 0.001) in SQR than RND in LATE, but higher (P < 0.001) in RND than SQR in EARLY. Stomping and kicking behaviours of cows were similar between treatments. Results of this study suggest that square milk liners potentially improve milking performance, without adverse effect on cow comfort compared to conventional round liners. Long-term, multi-site studies are required to confirm potential teat-end health benefits associated with square milk liners and further verify these results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Dairy Research
Journal of Dairy Research 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
117
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Dairy Research is an international Journal of high-standing that publishes original scientific research on all aspects of the biology, wellbeing and technology of lactating animals and the foods they produce. The Journal’s ability to cover the entire dairy foods chain is a major strength. Cross-disciplinary research is particularly welcomed, as is comparative lactation research in different dairy and non-dairy species and research dealing with consumer health aspects of dairy products. Journal of Dairy Research: an international Journal of the lactation sciences.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of the effects of two soy waste-based culture media on the technological properties of Lacticaseibacillus paracasei 90 as adjunct culture in miniature Cremoso cheese. Cultured blame. Vechur cow milk yoghurt: response surface methodology-based process optimization and storage studies. Physico-chemical, textural, microbiological and sensory properties together with fatty acid profiles of presumptive probiotic yoghurts fortified with persimmon (Diospyros kaki) powder. Formulation and characterization of novel dairy-based dip utilizing heat-acid-coagulated milk gel and whey.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1