多中心改进脑瘫青少年肌张力障碍筛查工作

Bhooma Rajagopalan Aravamuthan, Emma Lott, Esra Pehlivan, Keerthana Chintalapati, Deborah Grenard, Desiree Roge, Rose Gelineau-Morel, Dante Kyle, Christie Becu, Michael C Kruer, Linn Katus, Paul Gross, Amy F. Bailes, Cerebral Palsy Research Network
{"title":"多中心改进脑瘫青少年肌张力障碍筛查工作","authors":"Bhooma Rajagopalan Aravamuthan, Emma Lott, Esra Pehlivan, Keerthana Chintalapati, Deborah Grenard, Desiree Roge, Rose Gelineau-Morel, Dante Kyle, Christie Becu, Michael C Kruer, Linn Katus, Paul Gross, Amy F. Bailes, Cerebral Palsy Research Network","doi":"10.1101/2024.09.13.24313431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Objectives: Dystonia is a common, debilitating, and often treatment refractory motor symptom of cerebral palsy (CP), affecting 70-80% of this population based on research assessments. However, routine clinical evaluation for dystonia in CP has failed to match these expected numbers. Addressing this diagnostic gap is a medical imperative because the presence of dystonia rules in or out certain treatments for motor symptoms in CP. Therefore, our objective was to optimize rates of clinical dystonia screening to improve rates of clinical dystonia diagnosis. Methods: Using the quality improvement (QI) infrastructure of the Cerebral Palsy Research Network (CPRN), we developed and implemented interventions to increase the documentation percentage of five features of dystonia in young people with CP, aged 3-21 years old. This QI initiative was implemented by seven physiatry and pediatric movement disorders physicians at four tertiary-care pediatric hospitals between 10/10/21 and 7/1/23. We collected visit data cross-sectionally across all participating sites every 2 weeks and tracked our progress using control charts. Results: We assessed 847 unique visits, mostly for established patients (719/847, 85%) who were 9.2 years old on average (95% CI 8.8-9.5). By 4/10/22, the mean percentage of dystonia screening elements documented across all sites rose from 39% to 90% and the mean percentage of visits explicitly documenting the presence or absence of dystonia rose from 65% to 94%. By 10/23/22, the percentage of visits diagnosing dystonia rose from 57% to 74%. These increases were all sustained through the end of the study period in 7/1/23. Discussion: Using a rigorous QI-driven process across four member sites of a North American learning health network (CPRN), we demonstrated that we could increase screening for dystonia and that this was associated with increased clinical dystonia diagnosis, matching expected research-based rates. We propose that similar screening should take place across all sites caring for people with CP.","PeriodicalId":501367,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Neurology","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multi-center improvement in screening for dystonia in young people with cerebral palsy\",\"authors\":\"Bhooma Rajagopalan Aravamuthan, Emma Lott, Esra Pehlivan, Keerthana Chintalapati, Deborah Grenard, Desiree Roge, Rose Gelineau-Morel, Dante Kyle, Christie Becu, Michael C Kruer, Linn Katus, Paul Gross, Amy F. Bailes, Cerebral Palsy Research Network\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.09.13.24313431\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and Objectives: Dystonia is a common, debilitating, and often treatment refractory motor symptom of cerebral palsy (CP), affecting 70-80% of this population based on research assessments. However, routine clinical evaluation for dystonia in CP has failed to match these expected numbers. Addressing this diagnostic gap is a medical imperative because the presence of dystonia rules in or out certain treatments for motor symptoms in CP. Therefore, our objective was to optimize rates of clinical dystonia screening to improve rates of clinical dystonia diagnosis. Methods: Using the quality improvement (QI) infrastructure of the Cerebral Palsy Research Network (CPRN), we developed and implemented interventions to increase the documentation percentage of five features of dystonia in young people with CP, aged 3-21 years old. This QI initiative was implemented by seven physiatry and pediatric movement disorders physicians at four tertiary-care pediatric hospitals between 10/10/21 and 7/1/23. We collected visit data cross-sectionally across all participating sites every 2 weeks and tracked our progress using control charts. Results: We assessed 847 unique visits, mostly for established patients (719/847, 85%) who were 9.2 years old on average (95% CI 8.8-9.5). By 4/10/22, the mean percentage of dystonia screening elements documented across all sites rose from 39% to 90% and the mean percentage of visits explicitly documenting the presence or absence of dystonia rose from 65% to 94%. By 10/23/22, the percentage of visits diagnosing dystonia rose from 57% to 74%. These increases were all sustained through the end of the study period in 7/1/23. Discussion: Using a rigorous QI-driven process across four member sites of a North American learning health network (CPRN), we demonstrated that we could increase screening for dystonia and that this was associated with increased clinical dystonia diagnosis, matching expected research-based rates. We propose that similar screening should take place across all sites caring for people with CP.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501367,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Neurology\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.13.24313431\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.13.24313431","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目标:肌张力障碍是脑性瘫痪(CP)的一种常见、使人衰弱且常常难以治疗的运动症状,根据研究评估,70%-80%的脑性瘫痪患者都会出现这种症状。然而,对 CP 肌张力障碍的常规临床评估却未能达到这些预期数字。由于肌张力障碍的存在排除了某些治疗 CP 运动症状的方法,因此解决这一诊断空白是医学界的当务之急。因此,我们的目标是优化临床肌张力障碍筛查率,以提高临床肌张力障碍诊断率。方法:利用脑性瘫痪研究网络(CPRN)的质量改进(QI)基础设施,我们制定并实施了干预措施,以提高 3 至 21 岁患有肌张力障碍的青少年中五个肌张力障碍特征的记录比例。21 年 10 月 10 日至 23 年 1 月 7 日期间,四家三级儿科医院的七名理疗科和小儿运动障碍科医生实施了这项 QI 计划。我们每两周收集一次所有参与地点的横截面访问数据,并使用控制图跟踪进展情况。结果:我们评估了 847 次就诊,其中大部分是已确诊的患者(719/847,85%),他们的平均年龄为 9.2 岁(95% CI 8.8-9.5)。到 22 年 10 月 4 日,所有地点记录的肌张力障碍筛查要素的平均百分比从 39% 上升到 90%,明确记录存在或不存在肌张力障碍的就诊百分比从 65% 上升到 94%。截至 10/23/22 日,诊断为肌张力障碍的就诊百分比从 57% 上升至 74%。这些增长一直持续到研究期结束(7/1/23)。讨论:我们在北美学习型医疗网络(CPRN)的四个成员机构中采用了严格的 QI 驱动流程,证明我们可以提高肌张力障碍筛查率,而且这与临床肌张力障碍诊断率的提高有关,符合预期的研究结果。我们建议在所有为肌张力障碍患者提供医疗服务的机构中开展类似的筛查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Multi-center improvement in screening for dystonia in young people with cerebral palsy
Background and Objectives: Dystonia is a common, debilitating, and often treatment refractory motor symptom of cerebral palsy (CP), affecting 70-80% of this population based on research assessments. However, routine clinical evaluation for dystonia in CP has failed to match these expected numbers. Addressing this diagnostic gap is a medical imperative because the presence of dystonia rules in or out certain treatments for motor symptoms in CP. Therefore, our objective was to optimize rates of clinical dystonia screening to improve rates of clinical dystonia diagnosis. Methods: Using the quality improvement (QI) infrastructure of the Cerebral Palsy Research Network (CPRN), we developed and implemented interventions to increase the documentation percentage of five features of dystonia in young people with CP, aged 3-21 years old. This QI initiative was implemented by seven physiatry and pediatric movement disorders physicians at four tertiary-care pediatric hospitals between 10/10/21 and 7/1/23. We collected visit data cross-sectionally across all participating sites every 2 weeks and tracked our progress using control charts. Results: We assessed 847 unique visits, mostly for established patients (719/847, 85%) who were 9.2 years old on average (95% CI 8.8-9.5). By 4/10/22, the mean percentage of dystonia screening elements documented across all sites rose from 39% to 90% and the mean percentage of visits explicitly documenting the presence or absence of dystonia rose from 65% to 94%. By 10/23/22, the percentage of visits diagnosing dystonia rose from 57% to 74%. These increases were all sustained through the end of the study period in 7/1/23. Discussion: Using a rigorous QI-driven process across four member sites of a North American learning health network (CPRN), we demonstrated that we could increase screening for dystonia and that this was associated with increased clinical dystonia diagnosis, matching expected research-based rates. We propose that similar screening should take place across all sites caring for people with CP.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Biological markers of brain network connectivity and pain sensitivity distinguish low coping from high coping Veterans with persistent post-traumatic headache Association of Item-Level Responses to Cognitive Function Index with Tau Pathology and Hippocampal volume in The A4 Study EpiSemoLLM: A Fine-tuned Large Language Model for Epileptogenic Zone Localization Based on Seizure Semiology with a Performance Comparable to Epileptologists Selective effects of dopaminergic and noradrenergic degeneration on cognition in Parkinson's disease The Relationship Between Electrodermal Activity and Cardiac Troponin in Patients with Paroxysmal Sympathetic Hyperactivity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1