Marco Aurélio Bianchini, Mario Escobar, Maria Elisa Galarraga-Vinueza, Thalles Yurgen Balduino, Sergio Alexandre Gehrke
{"title":"种植体周围组织稳定性:关于创新种植体设计的五例系列报告","authors":"Marco Aurélio Bianchini, Mario Escobar, Maria Elisa Galarraga-Vinueza, Thalles Yurgen Balduino, Sergio Alexandre Gehrke","doi":"10.3390/app14188354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background/Aim: The stability of peri-implant tissues is crucial for the long-term success of dental implant treatments. A new cervical implant design has been developed to address the challenges associated with peri-implant tissue stability, featuring a concave cervical portion to increase tissue volume in this area. The present study aimed to clinically evaluate the effectiveness of the new cervical implant design in maintaining peri-implant tissue stability. Materials and Methods: Five clinical cases involving completely edentulous patients were selected, in which 25 implants were installed. The marginal bone level around each implant was assessed at three different time points—T0: immediately after the prosthesis installation, T1: 6 months post installation, and T2: at the last control visit, up to 38 months later. Measurements were taken to analyze changes in marginal bone levels (MBLs) and the keratinized mucosa (KM) over time. Furthermore, the keratinized mucosa (KM) around the implants was evaluated. Results: The mean and standard deviation values of the marginal bone levels at each time point were as follows—T0: 0.59 ± 0.55 mm; T1: 1.41 ± 0.59 mm; T2: 1.76 ± 0.69 mm. Statistical analysis showed significant differences across the time points (ANOVA p < 0.0001). The overall mean KM values were 3.85 mm for T1 and T2, showing the stability of the peri-implant soft tissues at ≥1-year controls. Conclusion: Within the limitations of the present study, the results showed that the Collo implants presented measured MBL values increasing within the time range analyzed in each case but within the normal values cited in the literature for these types of rehabilitation treatments. However, the measured KM values presented, in all cases, an average above the values referenced in the literature as a minimum for maintaining the health of the peri-implant tissues.","PeriodicalId":8224,"journal":{"name":"Applied Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peri-Implant Tissue Stability: A Series of Five Case Reports on an Innovative Implant Design\",\"authors\":\"Marco Aurélio Bianchini, Mario Escobar, Maria Elisa Galarraga-Vinueza, Thalles Yurgen Balduino, Sergio Alexandre Gehrke\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/app14188354\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background/Aim: The stability of peri-implant tissues is crucial for the long-term success of dental implant treatments. A new cervical implant design has been developed to address the challenges associated with peri-implant tissue stability, featuring a concave cervical portion to increase tissue volume in this area. The present study aimed to clinically evaluate the effectiveness of the new cervical implant design in maintaining peri-implant tissue stability. Materials and Methods: Five clinical cases involving completely edentulous patients were selected, in which 25 implants were installed. The marginal bone level around each implant was assessed at three different time points—T0: immediately after the prosthesis installation, T1: 6 months post installation, and T2: at the last control visit, up to 38 months later. Measurements were taken to analyze changes in marginal bone levels (MBLs) and the keratinized mucosa (KM) over time. Furthermore, the keratinized mucosa (KM) around the implants was evaluated. Results: The mean and standard deviation values of the marginal bone levels at each time point were as follows—T0: 0.59 ± 0.55 mm; T1: 1.41 ± 0.59 mm; T2: 1.76 ± 0.69 mm. Statistical analysis showed significant differences across the time points (ANOVA p < 0.0001). The overall mean KM values were 3.85 mm for T1 and T2, showing the stability of the peri-implant soft tissues at ≥1-year controls. Conclusion: Within the limitations of the present study, the results showed that the Collo implants presented measured MBL values increasing within the time range analyzed in each case but within the normal values cited in the literature for these types of rehabilitation treatments. However, the measured KM values presented, in all cases, an average above the values referenced in the literature as a minimum for maintaining the health of the peri-implant tissues.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8224,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/app14188354\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Mathematics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/app14188354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
Peri-Implant Tissue Stability: A Series of Five Case Reports on an Innovative Implant Design
Background/Aim: The stability of peri-implant tissues is crucial for the long-term success of dental implant treatments. A new cervical implant design has been developed to address the challenges associated with peri-implant tissue stability, featuring a concave cervical portion to increase tissue volume in this area. The present study aimed to clinically evaluate the effectiveness of the new cervical implant design in maintaining peri-implant tissue stability. Materials and Methods: Five clinical cases involving completely edentulous patients were selected, in which 25 implants were installed. The marginal bone level around each implant was assessed at three different time points—T0: immediately after the prosthesis installation, T1: 6 months post installation, and T2: at the last control visit, up to 38 months later. Measurements were taken to analyze changes in marginal bone levels (MBLs) and the keratinized mucosa (KM) over time. Furthermore, the keratinized mucosa (KM) around the implants was evaluated. Results: The mean and standard deviation values of the marginal bone levels at each time point were as follows—T0: 0.59 ± 0.55 mm; T1: 1.41 ± 0.59 mm; T2: 1.76 ± 0.69 mm. Statistical analysis showed significant differences across the time points (ANOVA p < 0.0001). The overall mean KM values were 3.85 mm for T1 and T2, showing the stability of the peri-implant soft tissues at ≥1-year controls. Conclusion: Within the limitations of the present study, the results showed that the Collo implants presented measured MBL values increasing within the time range analyzed in each case but within the normal values cited in the literature for these types of rehabilitation treatments. However, the measured KM values presented, in all cases, an average above the values referenced in the literature as a minimum for maintaining the health of the peri-implant tissues.
期刊介绍:
APPS is an international journal. APPS covers a wide spectrum of pure and applied mathematics in science and technology, promoting especially papers presented at Carpato-Balkan meetings. The Editorial Board of APPS takes a very active role in selecting and refereeing papers, ensuring the best quality of contemporary mathematics and its applications. APPS is abstracted in Zentralblatt für Mathematik. The APPS journal uses Double blind peer review.