反思欧盟一级的目标:提高各国实现欧洲教育区目标的绩效的不同战略

IF 3.1 4区 管理学 Q2 MANAGEMENT International Transactions in Operational Research Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI:10.1111/itor.13546
Dovilė Stumbrienė, José L. Ruiz, Inmaculada Sirvent
{"title":"反思欧盟一级的目标:提高各国实现欧洲教育区目标的绩效的不同战略","authors":"Dovilė Stumbrienė, José L. Ruiz, Inmaculada Sirvent","doi":"10.1111/itor.13546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The European Education Area strategic framework is the outcome of the continuous construction of European cooperation in education. It sets EU‐level goals for seven indicators, which should be achieved within a given timeframe. Previous researchers have shown that the national capacity of some countries to implement measurement standards can lag behind the ambition of EU‐level goals. This paper aims to propose a benchmarking approach to set country‐specific targets and identify different strategies for improving national performance toward strategic objectives. We proposed a benefit‐of‐doubt approach that incorporates information on EU‐level goals and employed it with the most recent data for 29 European countries. The model solves a bi‐objective problem that imposes two objectives of closeness, namely that between actual performances and targets (effort) and that between targets and EU‐level goals (adjustment). Managers involved in planning may choose the most appropriate plan based on targets common to all countries or others that consider individual circumstances.","PeriodicalId":49176,"journal":{"name":"International Transactions in Operational Research","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rethinking EU‐level goals: different strategies to improve national performance toward the European Education Area objectives\",\"authors\":\"Dovilė Stumbrienė, José L. Ruiz, Inmaculada Sirvent\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/itor.13546\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The European Education Area strategic framework is the outcome of the continuous construction of European cooperation in education. It sets EU‐level goals for seven indicators, which should be achieved within a given timeframe. Previous researchers have shown that the national capacity of some countries to implement measurement standards can lag behind the ambition of EU‐level goals. This paper aims to propose a benchmarking approach to set country‐specific targets and identify different strategies for improving national performance toward strategic objectives. We proposed a benefit‐of‐doubt approach that incorporates information on EU‐level goals and employed it with the most recent data for 29 European countries. The model solves a bi‐objective problem that imposes two objectives of closeness, namely that between actual performances and targets (effort) and that between targets and EU‐level goals (adjustment). Managers involved in planning may choose the most appropriate plan based on targets common to all countries or others that consider individual circumstances.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Transactions in Operational Research\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Transactions in Operational Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.13546\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Transactions in Operational Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/itor.13546","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欧洲教育领域战略框架是欧洲教育合作持续建设的成果。它为七项指标设定了欧盟层面的目标,这些目标应在给定的时间框架内实现。以往的研究表明,一些国家实施衡量标准的国家能力可能落后于欧盟层面目标的雄心。本文旨在提出一种基准方法,以设定针对具体国家的目标,并确定不同的战略来提高国家在实现战略目标方面的绩效。我们提出了一种 "疑点利益 "方法,其中包含了欧盟层面目标的信息,并利用了 29 个欧洲国家的最新数据。该模型解决了一个双目标问题,即实际绩效与目标(努力)之间以及目标与欧盟层面目标(调整)之间的两个接近目标。参与规划的管理人员可以根据所有国家的共同目标或考虑到个别情况的其他目标,选择最合适的计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rethinking EU‐level goals: different strategies to improve national performance toward the European Education Area objectives
The European Education Area strategic framework is the outcome of the continuous construction of European cooperation in education. It sets EU‐level goals for seven indicators, which should be achieved within a given timeframe. Previous researchers have shown that the national capacity of some countries to implement measurement standards can lag behind the ambition of EU‐level goals. This paper aims to propose a benchmarking approach to set country‐specific targets and identify different strategies for improving national performance toward strategic objectives. We proposed a benefit‐of‐doubt approach that incorporates information on EU‐level goals and employed it with the most recent data for 29 European countries. The model solves a bi‐objective problem that imposes two objectives of closeness, namely that between actual performances and targets (effort) and that between targets and EU‐level goals (adjustment). Managers involved in planning may choose the most appropriate plan based on targets common to all countries or others that consider individual circumstances.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Transactions in Operational Research
International Transactions in Operational Research OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE-
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
12.90%
发文量
146
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Transactions in Operational Research (ITOR) aims to advance the understanding and practice of Operational Research (OR) and Management Science internationally. Its scope includes: International problems, such as those of fisheries management, environmental issues, and global competitiveness International work done by major OR figures Studies of worldwide interest from nations with emerging OR communities National or regional OR work which has the potential for application in other nations Technical developments of international interest Specific organizational examples that can be applied in other countries National and international presentations of transnational interest Broadly relevant professional issues, such as those of ethics and practice Applications relevant to global industries, such as operations management, manufacturing, and logistics.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Special Issue on “Managing Supply Chain Resilience in the Digital Economy Era” Special Issue on “Sharing Platforms for Sustainability: Exploring Strategies, Trade-offs, and Applications” Special Issue on “Optimizing Port and Maritime Logistics: Advances for Sustainable and Efficient Operations” Special issue on “Multiple Criteria Decision Making for Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1