作为护理工作的 STEM 学习

IF 1.3 4区 教育学 Q2 CULTURAL STUDIES Cultural Studies of Science Education Pub Date : 2024-09-18 DOI:10.1007/s11422-024-10223-5
Katie Headrick Taylor, Jiyoung Lee, Erin Riesland, Mack Ikeru, Leslie Rupert Herrenkohl
{"title":"作为护理工作的 STEM 学习","authors":"Katie Headrick Taylor, Jiyoung Lee, Erin Riesland, Mack Ikeru, Leslie Rupert Herrenkohl","doi":"10.1007/s11422-024-10223-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In reckoning with anti-Blackness and white hegemony in STEM, this study recommits to critical feminist orientations and explores alternative engagements with STEM education that center “matters of care” where learners are encouraged to build upon their existing values of family and collectivism to reinvigorate rather than disrupt relations with/to community. Our view of STEM learning is informed by feminist critiques of technoscience as well as sociocultural studies of learning in classrooms, homes, and community settings. These models acknowledge and value pluralism, affect, context, esthetics, and the ambivalence of labor/care in STEM learning. Within these frames, our research-practice partnership (RPP, named “STUDIO”) reported on here commits to de-centering the myth of individual accomplishment in out-of-school time (OST) STEM learning by engaging the whole scientist (in the context of their community) while also working across various explanatory frameworks. We explore these commitments through literature, showing how we were informed by extant STEM education research, and also extant critiques. Looking at our programming through a critical feminist lens of care, we found STEM learning in STUDIO to be nourishment for participants, a form of maintenance, and supporting families of choice for youth and adult facilitators. In this paper, we provide examples of these findings, as well as implications for STEM educators working in school and OST contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":47132,"journal":{"name":"Cultural Studies of Science Education","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"STEM learning as care work\",\"authors\":\"Katie Headrick Taylor, Jiyoung Lee, Erin Riesland, Mack Ikeru, Leslie Rupert Herrenkohl\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11422-024-10223-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In reckoning with anti-Blackness and white hegemony in STEM, this study recommits to critical feminist orientations and explores alternative engagements with STEM education that center “matters of care” where learners are encouraged to build upon their existing values of family and collectivism to reinvigorate rather than disrupt relations with/to community. Our view of STEM learning is informed by feminist critiques of technoscience as well as sociocultural studies of learning in classrooms, homes, and community settings. These models acknowledge and value pluralism, affect, context, esthetics, and the ambivalence of labor/care in STEM learning. Within these frames, our research-practice partnership (RPP, named “STUDIO”) reported on here commits to de-centering the myth of individual accomplishment in out-of-school time (OST) STEM learning by engaging the whole scientist (in the context of their community) while also working across various explanatory frameworks. We explore these commitments through literature, showing how we were informed by extant STEM education research, and also extant critiques. Looking at our programming through a critical feminist lens of care, we found STEM learning in STUDIO to be nourishment for participants, a form of maintenance, and supporting families of choice for youth and adult facilitators. In this paper, we provide examples of these findings, as well as implications for STEM educators working in school and OST contexts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47132,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cultural Studies of Science Education\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cultural Studies of Science Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-024-10223-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CULTURAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultural Studies of Science Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-024-10223-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在反思科学、技术、工程和数学领域的反黑人现象和白人霸权的过程中,本研究重新致力于批判性的女权主义取向,并探索以 "关爱问题 "为中心的科学、技术、工程和数学教育的替代性参与方式,鼓励学习者以现有的家庭和集体主义价值观为基础,重振而不是破坏与社区的关系。我们对 STEM 学习的看法受到了女权主义对技术科学的批判以及对课堂、家庭和社区学习的社会文化研究的启发。这些模式承认并重视多元化、情感、背景、美学以及 STEM 学习中劳动/护理的矛盾性。在这些框架内,我们在此报告的研究与实践伙伴关系(RPP,名为 "STUDIO")致力于在校外时间(OST)STEM 学习中去中心化个人成就的神话,通过让整个科学家(在其社区背景下)参与进来,同时也在各种解释框架内开展工作。我们通过文献来探讨这些承诺,说明我们是如何从现有的 STEM 教育研究和现有的批评中获得启发的。通过女权主义的批判性关怀视角来审视我们的计划,我们发现 STUDIO 中的 STEM 学习对参与者来说是一种滋养,是一种维护,也是对青少年和成人辅导员选择家庭的支持。在本文中,我们将举例说明这些发现,以及对在学校和 OST 环境中工作的 STEM 教育工作者的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
STEM learning as care work

In reckoning with anti-Blackness and white hegemony in STEM, this study recommits to critical feminist orientations and explores alternative engagements with STEM education that center “matters of care” where learners are encouraged to build upon their existing values of family and collectivism to reinvigorate rather than disrupt relations with/to community. Our view of STEM learning is informed by feminist critiques of technoscience as well as sociocultural studies of learning in classrooms, homes, and community settings. These models acknowledge and value pluralism, affect, context, esthetics, and the ambivalence of labor/care in STEM learning. Within these frames, our research-practice partnership (RPP, named “STUDIO”) reported on here commits to de-centering the myth of individual accomplishment in out-of-school time (OST) STEM learning by engaging the whole scientist (in the context of their community) while also working across various explanatory frameworks. We explore these commitments through literature, showing how we were informed by extant STEM education research, and also extant critiques. Looking at our programming through a critical feminist lens of care, we found STEM learning in STUDIO to be nourishment for participants, a form of maintenance, and supporting families of choice for youth and adult facilitators. In this paper, we provide examples of these findings, as well as implications for STEM educators working in school and OST contexts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: Cultural Studies of Science Education is a peer reviewed journal that provides an interactive platform for researchers working in the multidisciplinary fields of cultural studies and science education. By taking a cultural approach and paying attention to theories from cultural studies, this new journal reflects the current diversity in the study of science education in a variety of contexts, including schools, museums, zoos, laboratories, parks and gardens, aquariums and community development, maintenance and restoration. This journal focuses on science education as a cultural, cross-age, cross-class, and cross-disciplinary phenomenon; publishes articles that have an explicit and appropriate connection with and immersion in cultural studies; seeks articles that have theory development as an integral aspect of the data presentation; establishes bridges between science education and social studies of science, public understanding of science, science/technology and human values, and science and literacy; builds new communities at the interface of currently distinct discourses; aims to be a catalyst that forges new genres of and for scholarly dissemination; provides an interactive dialogue that includes the editors, members of the review board, and selected international scholars; publishes manuscripts that encompass all forms of scholarly activity; includes research articles, essays, OP-ED, critical, comments, criticisms and letters on emerging issues of significance.
期刊最新文献
STEM learning as care work Languaging-as-practice in science education: an alternative to metaphors of language-as-tool “The joy of being a cause” versus “the pleasure of finding things out”: subalternity and Bildung in higher education engineering and physics How materialities and space–time travellings in class can breathe new life into Swedish secondary school Natural Science sexuality education Communities of practice and the elevation of urban elementary teacher discourse about critical pedagogy of place
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1