Daniele Dala Pola, Thaiuana Maia, Elis Moraes, Leticia Ogochi, Arthur Mesas, Fabio Pitta
{"title":"慢性阻塞性肺病患者的 \"肌肉疏松症 \"和睡眠问题","authors":"Daniele Dala Pola, Thaiuana Maia, Elis Moraes, Leticia Ogochi, Arthur Mesas, Fabio Pitta","doi":"10.1007/s11325-024-03126-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Objective</h3><p>To verify the relationship between sarcopenia and sleep in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>Individuals with COPD were cross-sectionally assessed for lung function (spirometry), sleep (both subjectively [Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, PSQI] and objectively [Actiwatch sleep monitor]) and the presence of sarcopenia (handgrip strength by dynamometry). All tests were carried out in accordance with international standards.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Twenty-nine individuals with COPD were analyzed (16 women; 69 ± 7 years; BMI 27 ± 5 kg/m<sup>2</sup>; FEV<sub>1</sub> 59 ± 19% predicted). Upon division in groups according to the presence or absence of sarcopenia, individuals with sarcopenia (in comparison to those without sarcopenia) had shorter sleep time (81 [75–85] vs. 86 [81–90] %; <i>p</i> = 0.043), lower sleep efficiency (77 [69–83] vs. 85 [75–87] %; <i>p</i> = 0.038), longer time awake after sleep onset (92 [71–120] vs. 58 [47–83] minutes; <i>p</i> = 0.0012) and more marked sleep fragmentation, represented by a higher number of sleep blocks/night (46 [41–49] vs. 34 [26–48]; <i>p</i> = 0.018), higher number of awake blocks/night (45 [40–49] vs. 34 [26–48]; <i>p</i> = 0.018) and shorter duration of sleep blocks/night (9 [8–10] vs. 14 [8–58] minutes; <i>p</i> = 0.043). There was no statistical difference when comparing the PSQI variables between the groups. However, handgrip strength was negatively associated with PSQI components 2 [<i>R</i>= -0.51, <i>p</i> = 0.005] and 5 [<i>R</i>= -0.39, <i>p</i> = 0.037].</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Individuals with COPD and sarcopenia (as measured by handgrip strength) have worse objectively measured sleep outcomes. This was not the case regarding a self-reported perception of worse sleep quality, although there was weak-to-moderate association between handgrip strength and subjective sleep.</p>","PeriodicalId":21862,"journal":{"name":"Sleep and Breathing","volume":"116 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sarcopenia and sleep in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease\",\"authors\":\"Daniele Dala Pola, Thaiuana Maia, Elis Moraes, Leticia Ogochi, Arthur Mesas, Fabio Pitta\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11325-024-03126-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Objective</h3><p>To verify the relationship between sarcopenia and sleep in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>Individuals with COPD were cross-sectionally assessed for lung function (spirometry), sleep (both subjectively [Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, PSQI] and objectively [Actiwatch sleep monitor]) and the presence of sarcopenia (handgrip strength by dynamometry). All tests were carried out in accordance with international standards.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>Twenty-nine individuals with COPD were analyzed (16 women; 69 ± 7 years; BMI 27 ± 5 kg/m<sup>2</sup>; FEV<sub>1</sub> 59 ± 19% predicted). Upon division in groups according to the presence or absence of sarcopenia, individuals with sarcopenia (in comparison to those without sarcopenia) had shorter sleep time (81 [75–85] vs. 86 [81–90] %; <i>p</i> = 0.043), lower sleep efficiency (77 [69–83] vs. 85 [75–87] %; <i>p</i> = 0.038), longer time awake after sleep onset (92 [71–120] vs. 58 [47–83] minutes; <i>p</i> = 0.0012) and more marked sleep fragmentation, represented by a higher number of sleep blocks/night (46 [41–49] vs. 34 [26–48]; <i>p</i> = 0.018), higher number of awake blocks/night (45 [40–49] vs. 34 [26–48]; <i>p</i> = 0.018) and shorter duration of sleep blocks/night (9 [8–10] vs. 14 [8–58] minutes; <i>p</i> = 0.043). There was no statistical difference when comparing the PSQI variables between the groups. However, handgrip strength was negatively associated with PSQI components 2 [<i>R</i>= -0.51, <i>p</i> = 0.005] and 5 [<i>R</i>= -0.39, <i>p</i> = 0.037].</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusion</h3><p>Individuals with COPD and sarcopenia (as measured by handgrip strength) have worse objectively measured sleep outcomes. This was not the case regarding a self-reported perception of worse sleep quality, although there was weak-to-moderate association between handgrip strength and subjective sleep.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sleep and Breathing\",\"volume\":\"116 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sleep and Breathing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-024-03126-w\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sleep and Breathing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11325-024-03126-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Sarcopenia and sleep in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Objective
To verify the relationship between sarcopenia and sleep in individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
Methods
Individuals with COPD were cross-sectionally assessed for lung function (spirometry), sleep (both subjectively [Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, PSQI] and objectively [Actiwatch sleep monitor]) and the presence of sarcopenia (handgrip strength by dynamometry). All tests were carried out in accordance with international standards.
Results
Twenty-nine individuals with COPD were analyzed (16 women; 69 ± 7 years; BMI 27 ± 5 kg/m2; FEV1 59 ± 19% predicted). Upon division in groups according to the presence or absence of sarcopenia, individuals with sarcopenia (in comparison to those without sarcopenia) had shorter sleep time (81 [75–85] vs. 86 [81–90] %; p = 0.043), lower sleep efficiency (77 [69–83] vs. 85 [75–87] %; p = 0.038), longer time awake after sleep onset (92 [71–120] vs. 58 [47–83] minutes; p = 0.0012) and more marked sleep fragmentation, represented by a higher number of sleep blocks/night (46 [41–49] vs. 34 [26–48]; p = 0.018), higher number of awake blocks/night (45 [40–49] vs. 34 [26–48]; p = 0.018) and shorter duration of sleep blocks/night (9 [8–10] vs. 14 [8–58] minutes; p = 0.043). There was no statistical difference when comparing the PSQI variables between the groups. However, handgrip strength was negatively associated with PSQI components 2 [R= -0.51, p = 0.005] and 5 [R= -0.39, p = 0.037].
Conclusion
Individuals with COPD and sarcopenia (as measured by handgrip strength) have worse objectively measured sleep outcomes. This was not the case regarding a self-reported perception of worse sleep quality, although there was weak-to-moderate association between handgrip strength and subjective sleep.
期刊介绍:
The journal Sleep and Breathing aims to reflect the state of the art in the international science and practice of sleep medicine. The journal is based on the recognition that management of sleep disorders requires a multi-disciplinary approach and diverse perspectives. The initial focus of Sleep and Breathing is on timely and original studies that collect, intervene, or otherwise inform all clinicians and scientists in medicine, dentistry and oral surgery, otolaryngology, and epidemiology on the management of the upper airway during sleep.
Furthermore, Sleep and Breathing endeavors to bring readers cutting edge information about all evolving aspects of common sleep disorders or disruptions, such as insomnia and shift work. The journal includes not only patient studies, but also studies that emphasize the principles of physiology and pathophysiology or illustrate potentially novel approaches to diagnosis and treatment. In addition, the journal features articles that describe patient-oriented and cost-benefit health outcomes research. Thus, with peer review by an international Editorial Board and prompt English-language publication, Sleep and Breathing provides rapid dissemination of clinical and clinically related scientific information. But it also does more: it is dedicated to making the most important developments in sleep disordered breathing easily accessible to clinicians who are treating sleep apnea by presenting well-chosen, well-written, and highly organized information that is useful for patient care.