毒死蜱对一些非目标淡水生物的急性毒性:技术级和商业配方哪个毒性更大?

IF 2.4 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY Ecotoxicology Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI:10.1007/s10646-024-02806-3
Rajib Majumder
{"title":"毒死蜱对一些非目标淡水生物的急性毒性:技术级和商业配方哪个毒性更大?","authors":"Rajib Majumder","doi":"10.1007/s10646-024-02806-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Chlorpyrifos is among the most widely sold organophosphates in the agriculture sector worldwide. Static bioassays were performed in the laboratory to compare the acute toxicity between the technical grade (94% a.i.) and commercial formulation (20% EC) of chlorpyrifos to four freshwater organisms: the crustacean zooplankton <i>Cyclops viridis</i>, the oligochaete worm <i>Branchiura sowerbyi</i>, the gastropod <i>Pila globosa</i>, and tadpole larvae of <i>Duttaphrynus melanostictus</i>. The recovery of actual chlorpyrifos concentrations in water after 2 h of exposure to the nominal concentrations ranged from 82.98% to 88.56%. The commercial formulation (F) of chlorpyrifos was found to be 1.94 to 2.76 times more toxic than the technical grade (T). Based on 96 h LC<sub>50</sub> values of T and F chlorpyrifos, <i>C. viridis</i> was found to be most sensitive (0.56 and 0.25 μg/L) and <i>P. globosa</i> as most tolerant (1482 and 536 μg/L) to chlorpyrifos. Changes in LC<sub>50</sub> values of both T and F chlorpyrifos were noted in respect of exposure hours for the three aquatic invertebrates and the tadpole larvae of the toad. In conclusion, the acute toxicity of chlorpyrifos to some non-target freshwater organisms differs between technical grade and commercial formulations.</p>","PeriodicalId":11497,"journal":{"name":"Ecotoxicology","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acute toxicity of chlorpyrifos to some non-target freshwater organisms: which one is more toxic—technical grade or commercial formulation?\",\"authors\":\"Rajib Majumder\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10646-024-02806-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Chlorpyrifos is among the most widely sold organophosphates in the agriculture sector worldwide. Static bioassays were performed in the laboratory to compare the acute toxicity between the technical grade (94% a.i.) and commercial formulation (20% EC) of chlorpyrifos to four freshwater organisms: the crustacean zooplankton <i>Cyclops viridis</i>, the oligochaete worm <i>Branchiura sowerbyi</i>, the gastropod <i>Pila globosa</i>, and tadpole larvae of <i>Duttaphrynus melanostictus</i>. The recovery of actual chlorpyrifos concentrations in water after 2 h of exposure to the nominal concentrations ranged from 82.98% to 88.56%. The commercial formulation (F) of chlorpyrifos was found to be 1.94 to 2.76 times more toxic than the technical grade (T). Based on 96 h LC<sub>50</sub> values of T and F chlorpyrifos, <i>C. viridis</i> was found to be most sensitive (0.56 and 0.25 μg/L) and <i>P. globosa</i> as most tolerant (1482 and 536 μg/L) to chlorpyrifos. Changes in LC<sub>50</sub> values of both T and F chlorpyrifos were noted in respect of exposure hours for the three aquatic invertebrates and the tadpole larvae of the toad. In conclusion, the acute toxicity of chlorpyrifos to some non-target freshwater organisms differs between technical grade and commercial formulations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecotoxicology\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecotoxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-024-02806-3\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecotoxicology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-024-02806-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

毒死蜱是全球农业领域销售最广泛的有机磷之一。在实验室中进行了静态生物测定,以比较毒死蜱工业级(94%有效成分)和商业制剂(20%EC)对四种淡水生物的急性毒性:甲壳类浮游动物 Cyclops viridis、寡毛类蠕虫 Branchiura sowerbyi、腹足类 Pila globosa 和 Duttaphrynus melanostictus 的蝌蚪幼虫。接触标称浓度 2 小时后,水中毒死蜱实际浓度的恢复率为 82.98% 至 88.56%。毒死蜱商业制剂(F)的毒性是工业级(T)的 1.94 至 2.76 倍。根据毒死蜱 T 和毒死蜱 F 的 96 小时半数致死浓度值,毒死蜱最敏感(0.56 和 0.25 μg/L),而球茎藻对毒死蜱最耐受(1482 和 536 μg/L)。对于三种水生无脊椎动物和蟾蜍的蝌蚪幼虫来说,毒死蜱 T 和 F 的半数致死浓度值随着接触时间的延长而变化。总之,毒死蜱对一些非目标淡水生物的急性毒性在工业级制剂和商业制剂之间存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Acute toxicity of chlorpyrifos to some non-target freshwater organisms: which one is more toxic—technical grade or commercial formulation?

Chlorpyrifos is among the most widely sold organophosphates in the agriculture sector worldwide. Static bioassays were performed in the laboratory to compare the acute toxicity between the technical grade (94% a.i.) and commercial formulation (20% EC) of chlorpyrifos to four freshwater organisms: the crustacean zooplankton Cyclops viridis, the oligochaete worm Branchiura sowerbyi, the gastropod Pila globosa, and tadpole larvae of Duttaphrynus melanostictus. The recovery of actual chlorpyrifos concentrations in water after 2 h of exposure to the nominal concentrations ranged from 82.98% to 88.56%. The commercial formulation (F) of chlorpyrifos was found to be 1.94 to 2.76 times more toxic than the technical grade (T). Based on 96 h LC50 values of T and F chlorpyrifos, C. viridis was found to be most sensitive (0.56 and 0.25 μg/L) and P. globosa as most tolerant (1482 and 536 μg/L) to chlorpyrifos. Changes in LC50 values of both T and F chlorpyrifos were noted in respect of exposure hours for the three aquatic invertebrates and the tadpole larvae of the toad. In conclusion, the acute toxicity of chlorpyrifos to some non-target freshwater organisms differs between technical grade and commercial formulations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecotoxicology
Ecotoxicology 环境科学-毒理学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
107
审稿时长
4.7 months
期刊介绍: Ecotoxicology is an international journal devoted to the publication of fundamental research on the effects of toxic chemicals on populations, communities and terrestrial, freshwater and marine ecosystems. It aims to elucidate mechanisms and processes whereby chemicals exert their effects on ecosystems and the impact caused at the population or community level. The journal is not biased with respect to taxon or biome, and papers that indicate possible new approaches to regulation and control of toxic chemicals and those aiding in formulating ways of conserving threatened species are particularly welcome. Studies on individuals should demonstrate linkage to population effects in clear and quantitative ways. Laboratory studies must show a clear linkage to specific field situations. The journal includes not only original research papers but technical notes and review articles, both invited and submitted. A strong, broadly based editorial board ensures as wide an international coverage as possible.
期刊最新文献
Interactions between contaminants and the trophic ecology of two seabirds in a coastal lagoon of the Gulf of California. Mercury exposure in an endangered songbird: influence of marsh hydrology and evidence for early breeding impairment. Active biomonitoring of stream ecosystems: untargeted metabolomic and proteomic responses and free radical scavenging activities in mussels. Cascade reservoirs affect mercury concentrations in fish from Teles Pires river, Brazilian Amazon. Enzymatic activity and gene expression changes in the earthworms induced by co-exposure to beta-cypermethrin and triadimefon.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1